Suppr超能文献

糖尿病血液透析患者连续血糖监测的准确性。

Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Hemodialysis Patients With Diabetes.

机构信息

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.

Tibor Rubin Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Long Beach, CA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2024 Nov 1;47(11):1922-1929. doi: 10.2337/dc24-0635.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In the general population, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) provides convenient and less-invasive glucose measurements than conventional self-monitored blood glucose and results in reduced hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia and increased time in target glucose range. However, accuracy of CGM versus blood glucose is not well established in hemodialysis patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Among 31 maintenance hemodialysis patients with diabetes hospitalized from October 2020 to May 2021, we conducted protocolized glucose measurements using Dexcom G6 CGM versus blood glucose, with the latter measured before each meal and at night, plus every 30-min during hemodialysis. We examined CGM-blood glucose correlations and agreement between CGM versus blood glucose using Bland-Altman plots, percentage of agreement, mean and median absolute relative differences (ARDs), and consensus error grids.

RESULTS

Pearson and Spearman correlations for averaged CGM versus blood glucose levels were 0.84 and 0.79, respectively; Bland-Altman showed the mean difference between CGM and blood glucose was ∼+15 mg/dL. Agreement rates using %20/20 criteria were 48.7%, 47.2%, and 50.2% during the overall, hemodialysis, and nonhemodialysis periods, respectively. Mean ARD (MARD) was ∼20% across all time periods; median ARD was 19.4% during the overall period and was slightly lower during nonhemodialysis (18.2%) versus hemodialysis periods (22.0%). Consensus error grids showed nearly all CGM values were in clinically acceptable zones A (no harm) and B (unlikely to cause significant harm).

CONCLUSIONS

In hemodialysis patients with diabetes, although MARD values were higher than traditional optimal analytic performance thresholds, error grids showed nearly all CGM values were in clinically acceptable zones. Further studies are needed to determine whether CGM improves outcomes in hemodialysis patients.

摘要

目的

在普通人群中,连续血糖监测(CGM)提供了比常规自我监测血糖更方便、侵入性更小的血糖测量方法,从而减少了低血糖和高血糖的发生,并增加了目标血糖范围内的时间。然而,CGM 与血糖的准确性在血液透析患者中尚未得到很好的证实。

研究设计和方法

在 2020 年 10 月至 2021 年 5 月住院的 31 名患有糖尿病的维持性血液透析患者中,我们使用 Dexcom G6 CGM 与血糖进行了方案化的血糖测量,后者在每餐和夜间以及血液透析期间每 30 分钟测量一次。我们通过 Bland-Altman 图、一致性百分比、平均和中位数绝对相对差异(ARD)以及共识误差网格,检查了 CGM 与血糖的相关性和一致性。

结果

平均 CGM 与血糖水平的 Pearson 和 Spearman 相关性分别为 0.84 和 0.79;Bland-Altman 显示 CGM 与血糖之间的平均差值约为+15mg/dL。使用 %20/20 标准,在整个、血液透析和非血液透析期间的一致性率分别为 48.7%、47.2%和 50.2%。所有时间段的平均 ARD(MARD)均约为 20%;整个时期的中位数 ARD 为 19.4%,略低于非血液透析(18.2%)与血液透析期间(22.0%)。共识误差网格显示,几乎所有 CGM 值都在临床可接受的 A 区(无伤害)和 B 区(不太可能造成重大伤害)内。

结论

在患有糖尿病的血液透析患者中,尽管 MARD 值高于传统的最佳分析性能阈值,但误差网格显示,几乎所有的 CGM 值都在临床可接受的范围内。需要进一步的研究来确定 CGM 是否能改善血液透析患者的结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验