Suppr超能文献

比较不同光谱范围的 UV-LED 照明在泰国森林地区户外诱捕蚊子的效果。

Comparison of different spectral ranges of UV-LED lighting for outdoor mosquito trapping in forested area in Thailand.

机构信息

Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.

Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 4002, Thailand.

出版信息

J Med Entomol. 2024 Nov 14;61(6):1510-1518. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjae112.

Abstract

Mosquito surveillance is critical for actively tracking the location and monitoring population levels and the threat of mosquito-borne disease. Although light-emitting diodes (LEDs) light traps have grown in popularity, there is still a limited understanding of the application of light wavelengths for trapping nocturnally active wild mosquitoes in forest ecotypes. This study evaluated the performance of different UV wavelengths in trapping mosquito populations in a forested mountainous area in Nakhon Ratchasima province, Thailand. Traps with different UV wavelengths were deployed in 6 locations, following a 6 × 6 Latin square replicated 6 times over a total of 36 nights. Light traps were operated between 18:00 and 06:00 h from October 2022 to August 2023. Mosquitoes were separately collected from individual traps every 4 h at 22.00, 2.00, and 6.00 h. Mosquitoes were killed by placing in a freezer (- 20 °C) for at least 30 min and then were morphologically identified using illustrated keys for adult females. Traps fitted with the LED 365 wavelength light source were the most effective in capturing 790 (23.66%) of the total mosquitoes collected, followed by the UV fluorescent 632 (18.93%), with the other 4 LED wavelengths collecting between 16.89% (LED 385) and 12.64% (LED 375) of the mosquitoes. Culex was the most common genus, representing 56.00% of total mosquito abundance. LED 365 and LED 385 were comparable to the UV fluorescent traps (the standard reference). Optimal trapping times were during 18:00-22:00 h. Compared to the other wavelengths, LED 365 was significantly more effective at capturing Coquillettidia and Culex mosquitoes than the UV-based traps.

摘要

蚊虫监测对于主动追踪蚊虫的位置、监测其种群水平和蚊媒疾病的威胁至关重要。尽管发光二极管(LED)诱蚊灯的应用越来越广泛,但对于在森林生态型中利用不同波长的光来诱捕夜间活动的野生蚊虫,人们的了解仍然有限。本研究评估了不同紫外线(UV)波长在泰国那空叻差是玛府森林山区捕获蚊虫种群中的表现。在 6 个地点部署了具有不同 UV 波长的诱蚊器,采用 6×6 拉丁方设计,总共重复 6 次,持续 36 晚。诱蚊器在 2022 年 10 月至 2023 年 8 月期间,从 18:00 至 06:00 运行。每 4 小时从每个诱蚊器中单独收集蚊虫,时间为 22:00、2:00 和 6:00。将捕获的蚊虫放入冷冻箱(-20℃)中至少 30 分钟以杀死蚊虫,然后使用成年雌性的形态学鉴定图谱进行鉴定。结果表明,配备 LED 365 波长光源的诱蚊器捕获的蚊虫数量最多,为 790 只(23.66%),其次是 UV 荧光 632 波长诱蚊器(18.93%),其他 4 种 LED 波长诱蚊器捕获的蚊虫数量在 16.89%(LED 385)至 12.64%(LED 375)之间。库蚊属是最常见的属,占总蚊虫数量的 56.00%。LED 365 和 LED 385 与 UV 荧光诱蚊器(标准参考)相当。最佳诱捕时间是 18:00-22:00 时。与其他波长相比,LED 365 比基于 UV 的诱蚊器更有效地捕获库蚊属和按蚊属蚊虫。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验