Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455.
J Neurosci. 2024 Oct 30;44(44):e1194232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1194-23.2024.
Dopamine (DA) and norepinephrine (NE) have been repeatedly implicated in neuropsychiatric vulnerability, in part via their roles in mediating the decision-making processes. Although two neuromodulators share a synthesis pathway and are coactivated under states of arousal, they engage in distinct circuits and modulatory roles. However, the specific role of each neuromodulator in decision-making, in particular the exploration-exploitation tradeoff, remains unclear. Revealing how each neuromodulator contributes to exploration-exploitation tradeoff is important in guiding mechanistic hypotheses emerging from computational psychiatric approaches. To understand the differences and overlaps of the roles of these two catecholamine systems in regulating exploration, a direct comparison using the same dynamic decision-making task is needed. Here, we ran male and female mice in a restless two-armed bandit task, which encourages both exploration and exploitation. We systemically administered a nonselective DA antagonist (flupenthixol), a nonselective DA agonist (apomorphine), a NE beta-receptor antagonist (propranolol), and a NE beta-receptor agonist (isoproterenol) and examined changes in exploration within subjects across sessions. We found a bidirectional modulatory effect of dopamine on exploration. Increasing dopamine activity decreased exploration and decreasing dopamine activity increased exploration. The modulatory effect of beta-noradrenergic receptor activity on exploration was mediated by sex. Reinforcement learning model parameters suggested that dopamine modulation affected exploration via decision noise and norepinephrine modulation affected exploration via sensitivity to outcome. Together, these findings suggested that the mechanisms that govern the exploration-exploitation transition are sensitive to changes in both catecholamine functions and revealed differential roles for NE and DA in mediating exploration.
多巴胺(DA)和去甲肾上腺素(NE)在神经精神易感性中反复被牵连,部分原因是它们在调节决策过程中的作用。尽管两种神经调质具有相同的合成途径,并在觉醒状态下共同激活,但它们参与了不同的回路和调节作用。然而,每种神经调质在决策中的特定作用,特别是探索-开发权衡,仍然不清楚。揭示每种神经调质如何有助于探索-开发权衡,对于从计算精神病学方法中得出的机制假设具有重要意义。为了了解这两种儿茶酚胺系统在调节探索方面的差异和重叠,需要使用相同的动态决策任务进行直接比较。在这里,我们让雄性和雌性小鼠在不安定的双臂赌博任务中奔跑,该任务鼓励探索和开发。我们系统地给小鼠施用了非选择性多巴胺拮抗剂(氟奋乃静)、非选择性多巴胺激动剂(阿扑吗啡)、去甲肾上腺素β受体拮抗剂(普萘洛尔)和去甲肾上腺素β受体激动剂(异丙肾上腺素),并在整个实验过程中观察了个体内部的探索变化。我们发现多巴胺对探索有双向调节作用。增加多巴胺活性会降低探索,而减少多巴胺活性会增加探索。β-去甲肾上腺素能受体活性对探索的调节作用受性别影响。强化学习模型参数表明,多巴胺调节通过决策噪声影响探索,而去甲肾上腺素调节通过对结果的敏感性影响探索。总之,这些发现表明,控制探索-开发过渡的机制对两种儿茶酚胺功能的变化敏感,并揭示了 NE 和 DA 在介导探索方面的不同作用。