The University of Melbourne, Australia.
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2024 Oct;107:73-81. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2024.07.001. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
Although Mary Hesse remains an influential figure within the history of the philosophy of science her reflections on the role of the human imagination in science have, to date, been mostly neglected. In her first, and often overlooked monograph-Science and the Human Imagination-Hesse described the imagination as composed of four dimensions. Defined as the historical, the critical, the fertile and the creative imagination, these dimensions played, for Hesse, various roles in both the philosophy and practice of science. Suffice to say, Hesse's discussion of the role of the imagination in science challenges the idea that philosophy and science are logically determined forms of practice through an appeal, as will be argued, to Immanuel Kant's seminal reflections on the 'indispensable function' of the imagination. Accordingly, a detailed elucidation of Science and the Human Imagination not only situates Hesse's reflections within the long history of the philosophy of the imagination; it revitalises anew contemporary debates on the role of the imagination in the philosophy and practice of science.
尽管玛丽·赫西 (Mary Hesse) 在科学哲学的历史中仍然是一位有影响力的人物,但迄今为止,她对人类想象力在科学中的作用的反思大多被忽视了。在她的第一部著作——《科学与人类想象力》(Science and the Human Imagination) 中,赫西将想象力描述为由四个维度组成。这四个维度被定义为历史的、批判的、富有成效的和创造性的想象力,在哲学和科学实践中,这些维度都发挥了不同的作用。可以说,赫西对想象力在科学中的作用的讨论,通过诉诸伊曼努尔·康德 (Immanuel Kant) 关于想象力“不可或缺的作用”的开创性思考,挑战了哲学和科学是逻辑上确定的实践形式的观点。因此,对《科学与人类想象力》的详细阐述不仅将赫西的反思置于想象力哲学的悠久历史中;它还为当代关于想象力在哲学和科学实践中的作用的辩论注入了新的活力。