Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Institute for Population and Precision Health, The University of Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 31;14(1):20256. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64851-6.
Environmental health research has suggested that fine particulate matter (PM) exposure can lead to high blood pressures, but it is unclear whether the impacts remain the same for systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP and DBP). This study aimed to examine whether the effects of PM exposure on SBP and DBP differ using data from a predominantly non-Hispanic Black cohort collected between 2013 and 2019 in the US. PM exposure was assessed based on a satellite-derived model across exposure durations from 1 to 36 months. The average PM exposure level was between 9.5 and 9.8 μg/m from 1 through 36 months. Mixed effects models were used to estimate the association of PM with SBP, DBP, and related hypertension types, adjusted for potential confounders. A total of 6381 participants were included. PM exposure was positively associated with both SBP and DBP. The association magnitudes depended on exposure durations. The association with SBP was null at the 1-month duration (β = 0.05, 95% CI: - 0.23, 0.33), strengthened as duration increased, and plateaued at the 24-month duration (β = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.54, 1.73). The association with DBP started with β = 0.29 (95% CI: 0.11, 0.47) at the 1-month duration, and plateaued at the 12-month duration (β = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.23, 1.99). PM was associated with isolated diastolic hypertension (12-month duration: odds ratio = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.34) and systolic-diastolic hypertension (12-month duration: odds ratio = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.10, 1.26), but not with isolated systolic hypertension. The findings suggest DBP is more sensitive to PM exposure and support differing effects of PM exposure on SBP and DBP. As elevation of SBP and DBP differentially predict CVD outcomes, this finding is relevant for prevention and treatment.
环境健康研究表明,细颗粒物(PM)暴露可导致高血压,但尚不清楚 PM 暴露对收缩压和舒张压(SBP 和 DBP)的影响是否相同。本研究旨在使用 2013 年至 2019 年期间在美国收集的以主要非西班牙裔黑人队列的数据,检验 PM 暴露对 SBP 和 DBP 的影响是否不同。PM 暴露是根据暴露持续时间为 1 至 36 个月的卫星衍生模型进行评估的。1 至 36 个月的平均 PM 暴露水平在 9.5 至 9.8μg/m 之间。采用混合效应模型估计 PM 与 SBP、DBP 及相关高血压类型的关联,调整了潜在混杂因素。共纳入 6381 名参与者。PM 暴露与 SBP 和 DBP 均呈正相关。关联程度取决于暴露持续时间。1 个月时的暴露与 SBP 无关联(β=0.05,95%CI:-0.23,0.33),随着时间的延长而增强,并在 24 个月时达到平台期(β=1.14,95%CI:0.54,1.73)。DBP 的关联从 1 个月时的β=0.29(95%CI:0.11,0.47)开始,在 12 个月时达到平台期(β=1.61,95%CI:1.23,1.99)。PM 与单纯舒张期高血压(12 个月时:比值比=1.20,95%CI:1.07,1.34)和收缩期-舒张期高血压(12 个月时:比值比=1.18,95%CI:1.10,1.26)相关,但与单纯收缩期高血压无关。这些发现表明 DBP 对 PM 暴露更敏感,并支持 PM 暴露对 SBP 和 DBP 的不同影响。由于 SBP 和 DBP 的升高会对 CVD 结局产生不同的预测作用,因此这一发现与预防和治疗有关。