Cameron J M
N Engl J Med. 1985 May 9;312(19):1233-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198505093121906.
This analysis, aimed at measuring the indirect costs associated with hospital teaching programs, found that university teaching hospitals were 33 per cent more costly than nonteaching hospitals with respect to direct hospital costs (excluding overhead) after adjustment for differences in case mix using diagnosis-related groups (DRGs). This study found major teaching hospitals (not administered by a university) to be 18 per cent and minor teaching hospitals 9 per cent more costly than nonteaching hospitals. These cost differentials were due primarily to the greater intensity of services provided in teaching settings rather than to the cost per unit of service. Inclusion of the full costs of physician services reduced the cost differences among teaching categories. Although teaching hospitals, especially university teaching hospitals, are demonstrably more expensive than nonteaching hospitals for the same types of cases, researchers and policy makers must consider the physician-substitution effect. This is particularly important in the light of the current controversy over the integration of physician costs for inpatient services into Medicare's DRG-based prospective-payment system.
这项旨在衡量与医院教学项目相关的间接成本的分析发现,在使用诊断相关分组(DRGs)对病例组合差异进行调整后,就直接医院成本(不包括管理费用)而言,大学教学医院比非教学医院贵33%。该研究发现,大型教学医院(不由大学管理)比非教学医院贵18%,小型教学医院比非教学医院贵9%。这些成本差异主要是由于教学环境中提供的服务强度更大,而非单位服务成本。将医生服务的全部成本计算在内,缩小了不同教学类别的成本差异。尽管对于相同类型的病例,教学医院,尤其是大学教学医院,显然比非教学医院更昂贵,但研究人员和政策制定者必须考虑医生替代效应。鉴于目前关于将住院服务的医生成本纳入医疗保险基于DRG的前瞻性支付系统存在争议,这一点尤为重要。