Suppr超能文献

使用VITEK、多粘菌素肉汤纸片洗脱法和多粘菌素肉汤微量稀释法对耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌进行多粘菌素敏感性试验的比较评估

Comparative Evaluation of Colistin-Susceptibility Testing in Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Using VITEK, Colistin Broth Disc Elution, and Colistin Broth Microdilution.

作者信息

Antony Tessa, Senthilnathan Yugadharshini, Madhavakumar Rukmani, Amudhan Premika, Venkataraman Shruthi, Rally Sanjana, Pitani Ravi S, Arumugam Ilakkiya

机构信息

Microbiology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, IND.

Community Medicine, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Jul 30;16(7):e65796. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65796. eCollection 2024 Jul.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The study aimed to compare the results of colistin-susceptibility testing performed using the automated VITEK system, colistin broth microdilution (BMD), and colistin broth disk elution (CBDE) methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This exploratory study was conducted in a tertiary care center in South India. Carbapenem-resistant (n = 49) isolates collected from a clinical microbiology laboratory over six months (March-September 2023) were used for the study.

RESULTS

Among the 49 carbapenem-resistant isolates, 42 were found to be susceptible to carbapenem by all three methods. Seven isolates were found to be resistant to colistin using BMD and CBDE methods. Two isolates were incorrectly detected as colistin-susceptible, and one isolate was wrongly categorized as colistin-resistant using the automated VITEK system.

CONCLUSION

CBDE is a reliable and cost-effective method that can be adopted in the routine microbiology laboratory for colistin-susceptibility testing, as it does not require any specialized equipment or techniques and is 100% consistent with the gold standard BMD method. Although the automated VITEK system is used in most routine microbiological laboratories for antibiotic-susceptibility testing, it cannot be reliably used for colistin-susceptibility testing due to its high error rates (very major error rate of 28.5%; major error rate of 2.4%).

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较使用自动化VITEK系统、黏菌素肉汤微量稀释法(BMD)和黏菌素肉汤纸片洗脱法(CBDE)进行黏菌素敏感性测试的结果。

材料与方法

本探索性研究在印度南部的一家三级医疗中心进行。从临床微生物实验室在六个月(2023年3月至9月)内收集的49株耐碳青霉烯类菌株用于该研究。

结果

在49株耐碳青霉烯类菌株中,所有三种方法均检测出42株对碳青霉烯类敏感。使用BMD和CBDE方法发现7株对黏菌素耐药。使用自动化VITEK系统时,有2株被错误地检测为对黏菌素敏感,1株被错误地归类为对黏菌素耐药。

结论

CBDE是一种可靠且具有成本效益的方法,可在常规微生物实验室中用于黏菌素敏感性测试,因为它不需要任何专门的设备或技术,并且与金标准BMD方法100%一致。尽管大多数常规微生物实验室使用自动化VITEK系统进行抗生素敏感性测试,但由于其高错误率(非常重大错误率为28.5%;重大错误率为2.4%),它不能可靠地用于黏菌素敏感性测试。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ab3/11362344/28416948211d/cureus-0016-00000065796-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验