• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用VITEK、多粘菌素肉汤纸片洗脱法和多粘菌素肉汤微量稀释法对耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌进行多粘菌素敏感性试验的比较评估

Comparative Evaluation of Colistin-Susceptibility Testing in Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Using VITEK, Colistin Broth Disc Elution, and Colistin Broth Microdilution.

作者信息

Antony Tessa, Senthilnathan Yugadharshini, Madhavakumar Rukmani, Amudhan Premika, Venkataraman Shruthi, Rally Sanjana, Pitani Ravi S, Arumugam Ilakkiya

机构信息

Microbiology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, IND.

Community Medicine, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Jul 30;16(7):e65796. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65796. eCollection 2024 Jul.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.65796
PMID:39219944
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11362344/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The study aimed to compare the results of colistin-susceptibility testing performed using the automated VITEK system, colistin broth microdilution (BMD), and colistin broth disk elution (CBDE) methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This exploratory study was conducted in a tertiary care center in South India. Carbapenem-resistant (n = 49) isolates collected from a clinical microbiology laboratory over six months (March-September 2023) were used for the study.

RESULTS

Among the 49 carbapenem-resistant isolates, 42 were found to be susceptible to carbapenem by all three methods. Seven isolates were found to be resistant to colistin using BMD and CBDE methods. Two isolates were incorrectly detected as colistin-susceptible, and one isolate was wrongly categorized as colistin-resistant using the automated VITEK system.

CONCLUSION

CBDE is a reliable and cost-effective method that can be adopted in the routine microbiology laboratory for colistin-susceptibility testing, as it does not require any specialized equipment or techniques and is 100% consistent with the gold standard BMD method. Although the automated VITEK system is used in most routine microbiological laboratories for antibiotic-susceptibility testing, it cannot be reliably used for colistin-susceptibility testing due to its high error rates (very major error rate of 28.5%; major error rate of 2.4%).

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较使用自动化VITEK系统、黏菌素肉汤微量稀释法(BMD)和黏菌素肉汤纸片洗脱法(CBDE)进行黏菌素敏感性测试的结果。

材料与方法

本探索性研究在印度南部的一家三级医疗中心进行。从临床微生物实验室在六个月(2023年3月至9月)内收集的49株耐碳青霉烯类菌株用于该研究。

结果

在49株耐碳青霉烯类菌株中,所有三种方法均检测出42株对碳青霉烯类敏感。使用BMD和CBDE方法发现7株对黏菌素耐药。使用自动化VITEK系统时,有2株被错误地检测为对黏菌素敏感,1株被错误地归类为对黏菌素耐药。

结论

CBDE是一种可靠且具有成本效益的方法,可在常规微生物实验室中用于黏菌素敏感性测试,因为它不需要任何专门的设备或技术,并且与金标准BMD方法100%一致。尽管大多数常规微生物实验室使用自动化VITEK系统进行抗生素敏感性测试,但由于其高错误率(非常重大错误率为28.5%;重大错误率为2.4%),它不能可靠地用于黏菌素敏感性测试。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ab3/11362344/89cc15535120/cureus-0016-00000065796-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ab3/11362344/28416948211d/cureus-0016-00000065796-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ab3/11362344/89cc15535120/cureus-0016-00000065796-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ab3/11362344/28416948211d/cureus-0016-00000065796-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ab3/11362344/89cc15535120/cureus-0016-00000065796-i02.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Colistin-Susceptibility Testing in Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Using VITEK, Colistin Broth Disc Elution, and Colistin Broth Microdilution.使用VITEK、多粘菌素肉汤纸片洗脱法和多粘菌素肉汤微量稀释法对耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌进行多粘菌素敏感性试验的比较评估
Cureus. 2024 Jul 30;16(7):e65796. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65796. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Evaluation of different methods for susceptibility testing of colistin in carbapenem resistant Gram-negative bacilli.碳青霉烯类耐药革兰阴性杆菌中多黏菌素药敏试验不同方法的评估
Access Microbiol. 2023 Oct 16;5(10). doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000595.v3. eCollection 2023.
3
Comparative Evaluation of Colistin Broth Disk Elution Method With Two Commercially Available Systems for Colistin Susceptibility Testing Against Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A Single-Center Exploratory Study.多黏菌素肉汤纸片洗脱法与两种市售系统对耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌进行多黏菌素敏感性检测的比较评估:一项单中心探索性研究
Cureus. 2022 May 31;14(5):e25549. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25549. eCollection 2022 May.
4
Evaluation of Broth Disk Elution Method to Determine Colistin Resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli Strains.评估肉汤纸片洗脱法检测肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠杆菌中产碳青霉烯酶菌株的敏感性
Clin Lab. 2023 Feb 1;69(2). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2022.221008.
5
Comparative evaluation of colistin broth disc elution (CBDE) and broth microdilution (BMD) in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa with special reference to heteroresistance.比较黏菌素肉汤纸片洗脱法(CBDE)和肉汤微量稀释法(BMD)在铜绿假单胞菌临床分离株中的应用,特别关注异质性耐药。
Indian J Med Microbiol. 2024 Jan-Feb;47:100494. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmmb.2023.100494. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
6
Surveillance of In Vitro Activity of Cefiderocol Against Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Clinical Isolates in a Tertiary Care Hospital.三级医院中头孢地尔对耐碳青霉烯类革兰氏阴性临床分离株体外活性的监测
Cureus. 2024 Aug 19;16(8):e67164. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67164. eCollection 2024 Aug.
7
Colistin Susceptibility Testing by Colistin Broth Disk Elution MIC Method among Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Blood Culture Clinical Isolates in a Tertiary Care Setting, East Delhi, India.在印度德里东部的一家三级护理医院中,通过含多黏菌素 B 药敏纸片洗脱法(colistin broth disk elution MIC method)对耐碳青霉烯类革兰氏阴性菌血培养临床分离株进行多黏菌素药敏试验。
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2023 Sep;33(5):743-750. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v33i5.4.
8
[Evaluation of the BD Phoenix100 System and Colistin Broth Disk Elution Method for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Colistin Against Gram-negative Bacteria].[BD Phoenix100系统与多黏菌素肉汤纸片洗脱法对革兰阴性菌进行多黏菌素药敏试验的评估]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2019 Jul;53(3):254-261. doi: 10.5578/mb.68066.
9
[The comparison of methods for determination of colistin susceptibility in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae.].[耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌中多黏菌素敏感性测定方法的比较。]
Klin Lab Diagn. 2018;63(10):646-650. doi: 10.18821/0869-2084-2018-63-10-646-650.
10
Evaluation Report of the Colistin Broth Disk Elution Method with Isolates from a Low-Resource Setting.低资源环境下分离菌株的多粘菌素肉汤纸片洗脱法评估报告。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Oct 26;10(5):e0087122. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00871-22. Epub 2022 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Colistin Susceptibility in Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Isolates Using Broth Microdilution, MICRONAUT-MIC-Strip, and VITEK MS.使用肉汤微量稀释法、MICRONAUT-MIC试纸条法和VITEK MS对耐碳青霉烯鲍曼不动杆菌分离株进行黏菌素敏感性评估。
Microbiologyopen. 2025 Aug;14(4):e70046. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.70046.
2
Evaluation of Six Commercial and Noncommercial Colistin Resistance Diagnostics.六种商业和非商业性黏菌素耐药性诊断方法的评估。
Microbiologyopen. 2025 Aug;14(4):e70029. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.70029.
3
Prevalence, trends, and molecular insights into colistin resistance among gram-negative bacteria in Egypt: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Mobile colistin resistance (mcr) genes and recent developments in colistin resistance detection.移动多粘菌素耐药性(mcr)基因和多粘菌素耐药性检测的最新进展。
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2023 Sep 1;76(9). doi: 10.1093/lambio/ovad102.
2
Comparative Evaluation of Two Automated ID/AST Systems and Mikrolatest Kit in Assessing the Colistin Susceptibility of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Isolates: A Single-Center Exploratory Study from North India.两种自动化鉴定/药敏试验系统与Mikrolatest试剂盒在评估耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科分离株对黏菌素敏感性方面的比较评价:一项来自印度北部的单中心探索性研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2022 Jan-Mar;14(1):52-55. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_651_21. Epub 2022 May 19.
3
埃及革兰氏阴性菌中黏菌素耐药性的流行情况、趋势及分子见解:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2025 May 10;24(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12941-025-00799-3.
Evaluation of Vitek®2 performance for colistin susceptibility testing for Gram-negative isolates.
Vitek®2系统对革兰氏阴性菌分离株进行黏菌素药敏试验的性能评估。
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2020 Dec 4;2(4):dlaa101. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlaa101. eCollection 2020 Dec.
4
Colistin Resistance Among Multiple Sequence Types of Is Associated With Diverse Resistance Mechanisms: A Report From India.多种序列类型中多粘菌素耐药性与多种耐药机制相关:来自印度的报告。
Front Microbiol. 2021 Feb 22;12:609840. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.609840. eCollection 2021.
5
Evolution of Colistin Resistance in the Klebsiella pneumoniae Complex Follows Multiple Evolutionary Trajectories with Variable Effects on Fitness and Virulence Characteristics.肺炎克雷伯菌复合体中多粘菌素耐药的进化遵循多种进化轨迹,对其适应性和毒力特征的影响各不相同。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Dec 16;65(1). doi: 10.1128/AAC.01958-20.
6
Simple Phenotypic Tests To Improve Accuracy in Screening Chromosomal and Plasmid-Mediated Colistin Resistance in Gram-Negative Bacilli.简单表型试验提高革兰氏阴性杆菌中介导黏菌素耐药的染色体和质粒的筛选准确性。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Dec 17;59(1). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01701-20.
7
Elution methods to evaluate colistin susceptibility of Gram-negative rods.评估革兰氏阴性杆菌对黏菌素敏感性的洗脱方法。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Jan;96(1):114910. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.114910. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
8
Multicenter Evaluation of Colistin Broth Disk Elution and Colistin Agar Test: a Report from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.多中心评估黏菌素肉汤洗脱纸片法和黏菌素琼脂试验:来自临床和实验室标准协会的报告。
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Oct 23;57(11). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01269-19. Print 2019 Nov.
9
Molecular mechanisms related to colistin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae.肠杆菌科细菌中与黏菌素耐药性相关的分子机制。
Infect Drug Resist. 2019 Apr 24;12:965-975. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S199844. eCollection 2019.
10
Emerging Strategies to Combat ESKAPE Pathogens in the Era of Antimicrobial Resistance: A Review.抗菌药物耐药时代对抗ESKAPE病原体的新兴策略:综述
Front Microbiol. 2019 Apr 1;10:539. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00539. eCollection 2019.