Institute of Biosciences, Life Sciences Centre, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Br J Surg. 2024 Aug 30;111(9). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae213.
Postoperative complications after colorectal cancer surgery have been linked to the gut microbiome. However, the impact of mechanical bowel preparation using oral preparation agents or rectal enema on postoperative infections remains poorly understood. This study aimed to compare the impact of oral preparation and rectal enema on the gut microbiome and postoperative complications.
This open-label pilot RCT was conducted at the National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania. Patients with left-side colorectal cancer scheduled for elective resection with primary anastomosis were randomized 1 : 1 to preoperative mechanical bowel preparation with either oral preparation or rectal enema. Stool samples were collected before surgery, and on postoperative day 6 and 30 for 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis. The primary outcome was difference in β-diversity between groups on postoperative day 6.
Forty participants were randomized to oral preparation (20) or rectal enema (20). The two groups had similar changes in microbiome composition, and there was no difference in β-diversity on postoperative day 6. Postoperative infections occurred in 12 patients (32%), without differences between the study groups. Patients with infections had an increased abundance of bacteria from the Actinomycetaceae family, Actinomyces genus, Sutterella uncultured species, and Enterococcus faecalis species.
Mechanical bowel preparation with oral preparation or rectal enema resulted in similar dysbiosis. Patients who experienced postoperative infections exhibited distinct gut microbiome compositions on postoperative day 6, characterized by an increased abundance of bacteria from the Actinomycetaceae family, Actinomyces genus, Sutterella uncultured species, and Enterococcus faecalis species.
NCT04013841 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
结直肠癌手术后的并发症与肠道微生物群有关。然而,使用口服制剂或直肠灌肠进行机械肠道准备对术后感染的影响仍知之甚少。本研究旨在比较口服准备和直肠灌肠对肠道微生物群和术后并发症的影响。
这是一项在立陶宛维尔纽斯国家癌症研究所进行的开放性、单臂、随机对照试验。计划接受选择性左半结直肠癌切除术并进行一期吻合术的患者,按 1:1 随机分为口服准备或直肠灌肠机械肠道准备。在术前、术后第 6 天和第 30 天采集粪便样本进行 16S rRNA 基因测序分析。主要结局是术后第 6 天两组间β多样性的差异。
40 名患者被随机分为口服准备组(20 名)或直肠灌肠组(20 名)。两组的微生物群落组成变化相似,术后第 6 天的β多样性无差异。术后感染发生在 12 名患者(32%),两组间无差异。感染患者的放线菌科、放线菌属、Sutterella 未培养种和粪肠球菌属细菌丰度增加。
口服准备或直肠灌肠机械肠道准备导致的肠道菌群失调相似。术后感染患者术后第 6 天的肠道微生物群组成明显不同,特征是放线菌科、放线菌属、Sutterella 未培养种和粪肠球菌属细菌丰度增加。
NCT04013841(http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)。