• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

摆臂可延长反向跳跃中关节伸展的近-远时滞。

An arm swing enhances the proximal-to-distal delay in joint extension during a countermovement jump.

机构信息

Faculty of Sport, Technology and Health Sciences, St Mary's University, Twickenham, UK.

Ballet Healthcare, The Royal Ballet, Royal Opera House, London, UK.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 2;14(1):20371. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70194-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-70194-z
PMID:39223150
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11368957/
Abstract

An abundance of degrees of freedom (DOF) exist when executing a countermovement jump (CMJ). This research aims to simplify the understanding of this complex system by comparing jump performance and independent functional DOF (fDOF) present in CMJs without (CMJ) and with (CMJ) an arm swing. Principal component analysis was used on 39 muscle forces and 15 3-dimensional joint contact forces obtained from kinematic and kinetic data, analyzed in FreeBody (a segment-based musculoskeletal model). Jump performance was greater in CMJ with the increased ground contact time resulting in higher external (p = 0.012), hip (p < 0.001) and ankle (p = 0.009) vertical impulses, and slower hip extension enhancing the proximal-to-distal joint extension strategy. This allowed the hip muscles to generate higher forces and greater time-normalized hip vertical impulse (p = 0.006). Three fDOF were found for the muscle forces and 3-dimensional joint contact forces during CMJ, while four fDOF were present for CMJ. This suggests that the underlying anatomy provides mechanical constraints during a CMJ, reducing the demand on the control system. The additional fDOF present in CMJ suggests that the arms are not mechanically coupled with the lower extremity, resulting in additional variation within individual motor strategies.

摘要

在进行反跳(CMJ)时,存在大量的自由度(DOF)。本研究旨在通过比较无臂摆动(CMJ)和有臂摆动(CMJ)的跳跃性能和独立功能自由度(fDOF),来简化对这个复杂系统的理解。使用主成分分析(PCA)对从运动学和动力学数据中获得的 39 个肌肉力和 15 个三维关节接触力进行了分析,这些数据是在 FreeBody(基于节段的肌肉骨骼模型)中进行分析的。CMJ 的跳跃性能更高,因为地面接触时间增加,导致外部(p = 0.012)、髋关节(p < 0.001)和踝关节(p = 0.009)的垂直冲量更高,髋关节的伸展速度更慢,增强了近端到远端关节的伸展策略。这使得髋关节肌肉能够产生更高的力和更大的时间归一化髋关节垂直冲量(p = 0.006)。在 CMJ 期间,发现肌肉力和三维关节接触力有三个 fDOF,而在 CMJ 中有四个 fDOF。这表明,潜在的解剖结构在 CMJ 期间提供了机械约束,从而降低了控制系统的需求。CMJ 中存在的额外 fDOF 表明手臂与下肢在机械上没有耦合,导致个体运动策略中的额外变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79d2/11368957/4ad8452efde8/41598_2024_70194_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79d2/11368957/7bada60e3d6a/41598_2024_70194_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79d2/11368957/c02ccddece54/41598_2024_70194_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79d2/11368957/8216e6bbe00c/41598_2024_70194_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79d2/11368957/4ad8452efde8/41598_2024_70194_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79d2/11368957/7bada60e3d6a/41598_2024_70194_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79d2/11368957/c02ccddece54/41598_2024_70194_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79d2/11368957/8216e6bbe00c/41598_2024_70194_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79d2/11368957/4ad8452efde8/41598_2024_70194_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
An arm swing enhances the proximal-to-distal delay in joint extension during a countermovement jump.摆臂可延长反向跳跃中关节伸展的近-远时滞。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 2;14(1):20371. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70194-z.
2
Proximal-to-distal sequencing in vertical jumping with and without arm swing.有臂摆动和无臂摆动垂直跳跃的近-远侧顺序。
J Strength Cond Res. 2014 May;28(5):1195-202. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000388.
3
A comparison of the mechanical effect of arm swing and countermovement on the lower extremities in vertical jumping.垂直跳跃中手臂摆动和反向运动对下肢机械效应的比较。
Hum Mov Sci. 2008 Aug;27(4):636-48. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2008.04.001. Epub 2008 Jul 31.
4
A biomechanical comparison of the vertical jump, power clean, and jump squat.垂直纵跳、高翻和深蹲跳的生物力学比较
J Sports Sci. 2014;32(16):1576-85. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2014.908320. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
5
Differences in End Range of Motion Vertical Jump Kinetic and Kinematic Strategies Between Trained Weightlifters and Elite Short Track Speed Skaters.训练有素的举重运动员与优秀短道速滑运动员在垂直纵跳动作终末范围、动力学和运动学策略上的差异。
J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Sep;29(9):2488-96. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000889.
6
Effect of forward trunk inclination on joint power output in vertical jumping.前躯干倾斜对垂直跳跃中关节功率输出的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2008 May;22(3):708-14. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181636c6c.
7
The energetics and benefit of an arm swing in submaximal and maximal vertical jump performance.次最大强度和最大强度垂直跳跃表现中摆臂的能量学及益处
J Sports Sci. 2006 Jan;24(1):51-7. doi: 10.1080/02640410400023217.
8
Segmental and kinetic contributions in vertical jumps performed with and without an arm swing.在有和没有摆臂情况下进行垂直跳跃时的节段性和动力学贡献。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2004 Sep;75(3):216-30. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2004.10609155.
9
Principal Component Analysis Reveals the Proximal to Distal Pattern in Vertical Jumping Is Governed by Two Functional Degrees of Freedom.主成分分析揭示了垂直跳跃中从近端到远端的模式受两个功能自由度的支配。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019 Aug 8;7:193. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00193. eCollection 2019.
10
The maximal and submaximal vertical jump: implications for strength and conditioning.最大和次最大垂直纵跳:对力量和体能训练的启示
J Strength Cond Res. 2004 Nov;18(4):787-91. doi: 10.1519/14093.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Physical and Biomechanical Relationships with Countermovement Jump Performance in Team Sports: Implications for Athletic Development and Injury Risk.团队运动中与反向移动跳跃表现的身体及生物力学关系:对运动发展和受伤风险的启示
Sports (Basel). 2025 Aug 20;13(8):277. doi: 10.3390/sports13080277.
2
The Effects of Familiarisation on Countermovement Jumps with Handheld Dumbbell Accentuated Eccentric Loading in Youth Athletes.熟悉化对青少年运动员手持哑铃加重离心负荷的反向跳跃的影响。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2025 Sep;25(9):e70033. doi: 10.1002/ejsc.70033.

本文引用的文献

1
Task Demand Changes Motor Control Strategies in Vertical Jumping.任务需求变化会改变垂直跳跃中的运动控制策略。
J Mot Behav. 2021;53(4):471-482. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2020.1797621. Epub 2020 Aug 2.
2
Changes in Movement Coordination Associated With Skill Acquisition in Baseball Batting: Freezing/Freeing Degrees of Freedom and Functional Variability.与棒球击球技能习得相关的运动协调变化:自由度的冻结/释放与功能变异性
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 25;11:1295. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01295. eCollection 2020.
3
Freezing Degrees of Freedom During Motor Learning: A Systematic Review.
运动学习过程中的自由度冻结:系统评价。
Motor Control. 2020 Mar 28;24(3):457-471. doi: 10.1123/mc.2019-0060.
4
Principal Component Analysis Reveals the Proximal to Distal Pattern in Vertical Jumping Is Governed by Two Functional Degrees of Freedom.主成分分析揭示了垂直跳跃中从近端到远端的模式受两个功能自由度的支配。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019 Aug 8;7:193. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00193. eCollection 2019.
5
The patella: A mechanical determinant of coordination during vertical jumping.髌骨:垂直跳跃过程中协调性的一个力学决定因素。
J Theor Biol. 2018 Jun 7;446:205-211. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.03.013. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
6
Kinetic Contributions of The Upper Limbs During Counter-Movement Verical Jumps With and Without Arm Swing.在有和没有手臂摆动的反向垂直跳跃中,上肢的动力学贡献。
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Aug;33(8):2066-2073. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002275.
7
Conscious Control Is Associated With Freezing of Mechanical Degrees of Freedom During Motor Learning.意识控制与运动学习过程中机械自由度的冻结有关。
J Mot Behav. 2018 Jul-Aug;50(4):436-456. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2017.1365045. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
8
What Is a Joint Torque for Joints Spanned by Multiarticular Muscles?由多关节肌肉跨越的关节的关节扭矩是什么?
J Appl Biomech. 1993 Nov;9(4):333-336. doi: 10.1123/jab.9.4.333.
9
Effect of an Arm Swing on Countermovement Vertical Jump Performance in Elite Volleyball Players: FINAL.手臂摆动对精英排球运动员反向移动垂直跳跃表现的影响:最终结果
J Hum Kinet. 2016 Oct 14;53:41-50. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2016-0009. eCollection 2016 Dec 1.
10
Neuromechanical synergies in single-leg landing reveal changes in movement control.单腿落地时的神经力学协同作用揭示了运动控制的变化。
Hum Mov Sci. 2016 Oct;49:66-78. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jun 21.