School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 1200 Pressler, Houston, Texas, 77030, United States.
SSRS, 1 Braxton Way, Suite 125, Glen Mills, PA, 19342, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 2;24(1):2375. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19765-3.
Structural racism plays a major role in reproductive health inequities. Colorism, discrimination based on skin color, may profoundly impact reproductive health access and service delivery. However, quantitative research in this area is limited.
We administered an online survey of women (n = 1,299) aged 18-44 from Harris County, Texas to assess the relationship between skin color discrimination and reproductive health service avoidance. The survey included questions on demographics, self-reported skin tone, and dichotomous measures of previous discrimination experiences and avoidance of care because of perceived discrimination. Binary logistic regression was used to examine whether race/ethnicity, skin tone, and previous discrimination experiences were related to avoidance of contraceptive care because of perceived discrimination.
Approximately one-third (31.5%) of the sample classified themselves as non-Hispanic Whites (31.5%), 22.4% as Black, 27.4% as Hispanic and born within the US, and 7.6% as Hispanic born outside of the US. Approximately one-third of women classified themselves in the lightest skin tones, whereas almost one in five women classified themselves in the darkest skin tone palates. Darker skin tones had increasingly greater odds of reporting that they avoided seeking birth control out of a concern for discrimination compared to the lightest skin tone. After adjusting for race/ethnicity and sociodemographic variables (model 3), darker skin tones remained significantly associated with avoiding birth control.
This study demonstrates the role that skin color discrimination plays in negative reproductive health experiences. While this is not surprising given that those with racist ideologies developed the concept of these racial and ethnic categories, the apparent association with darker skin colors and avoidance of seeking birth control provides evidence that structural and individual racism continues to have far-reaching and insidious consequences.
Contraception is recognized for reducing maternal mortality, improving child health, increasing female empowerment, and decreasing poverty. However, not all women equally enjoy the benefits of access to contraception. Addressing colorism within reproductive healthcare has become critically important as the nation becomes increasingly diverse. Focusing on skin tone-based discrimination and its roots in anti-blackness expands our understanding beyond a Black-White binary traditionally applied when addressing racism in healthcare delivery.
结构性种族主义在生殖健康不平等中起着重要作用。肤色歧视是指基于肤色的歧视,可能会深刻影响生殖健康的获取和服务提供。然而,这方面的定量研究有限。
我们对德克萨斯州哈里斯县的 18-44 岁女性(n=1299)进行了在线调查,以评估皮肤颜色歧视与生殖健康服务回避之间的关系。该调查包括人口统计学、自我报告的肤色以及以前歧视经历和因感知到的歧视而回避护理的二分法措施。使用二元逻辑回归检查种族/民族、肤色和以前的歧视经历是否与因感知到的歧视而回避避孕护理有关。
样本中约有三分之一(31.5%)自我归类为非西班牙裔白人(31.5%),22.4%为黑人,27.4%为西班牙裔且出生于美国,7.6%为出生于美国境外的西班牙裔。大约三分之一的女性将自己归类为肤色最浅的肤色,而近五分之一的女性将自己归类为肤色最深的肤色。与肤色最浅的女性相比,肤色较深的女性报告因担心歧视而回避寻求避孕的可能性要大得多。在调整种族/民族和社会人口统计学变量后(模型 3),肤色较深的女性与避免避孕之间仍然存在显著关联。
这项研究表明,皮肤颜色歧视在负面生殖健康体验中起着作用。虽然鉴于那些持有种族主义意识形态的人开发了这些种族和族裔类别的概念,这并不奇怪,但与较深肤色和避免寻求避孕之间的明显关联提供了证据,表明结构性和个人种族主义仍然具有深远而阴险的后果。
避孕药具的使用已被公认为可以降低孕产妇死亡率、改善儿童健康、增强女性权能和减少贫困。然而,并非所有女性都能平等地享受获得避孕的好处。在生殖保健中解决肤色歧视问题变得至关重要,因为国家的多样性日益增加。关注基于肤色的歧视及其在反黑人主义中的根源,超越了传统上在医疗保健中解决种族主义时应用的黑人和白人二元对立,扩展了我们的理解。