• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)和主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)支持的心脏移植患者的生存趋势:一项为期10年的器官共享联合网络(UNOS)数据库分析。

Survival trends in heart transplant patients supported on ECMO and IABP: A 10-year UNOS database analysis.

作者信息

Echieh Chidiebere Peter, Hamidi Mohammad, Rogers Michael P, Acharya Deepak, Kazui Toshinobu, Hooker Robert L

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria.

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Banner Tucson, Tucson, AZ, United States.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024 Aug 13;54:101486. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101486. eCollection 2024 Oct.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101486
PMID:39224461
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11367637/
Abstract

The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) heart transplant allocation policy was changed in 2018. This study examines the impact of the change in UNOS heart transplant allocation policy on the use of temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices and post-transplant survival. The analysis included a total of 26,481 patients listed and transplanted between January 2013 and June 2022. The results showed a decrease in waiting time for transplant after the policy change, indicating a successful reduction in waitlist time for high-priority status patients. However, the length of hospital stays from transplant to discharge increased following the policy change. The study also found an increase in the frequency of ECMO and IABP use both at the time of listing and at the time of transplant following the policy change. Cumulative patient and graft survival at 1000 days decreased following the policy change (86.1 per cent versus 83.7 per cent at 1000 days, p = 0.002). However, the survival curves showed similar survival trends in the first 2 years, with late divergence in survival occurring after 2 years. In conclusion the latest UNOS heart transplant allocation policy change led to a decrease in waiting times and an increase in the use of temporary MCS devices. There was a decrease in cummulative survival at 1000 days following the policy change.

摘要

器官共享联合网络(UNOS)的心脏移植分配政策于2018年发生了变化。本研究考察了UNOS心脏移植分配政策的变化对临时机械循环支持(MCS)设备使用情况及移植后生存率的影响。该分析纳入了2013年1月至2022年6月期间登记并接受移植的共计26481例患者。结果显示,政策变化后移植等待时间缩短,这表明高优先级状态患者的等待名单时间成功缩短。然而,政策变化后,从移植到出院的住院时间延长。该研究还发现,政策变化后,在登记时和移植时使用体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)和主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)的频率均有所增加。政策变化后,1000天时的累积患者和移植物生存率下降(1000天时为86.1%对83.7%,p = 0.002)。然而,生存曲线在前2年显示出相似的生存趋势,2年后生存出现后期差异。总之,最新的UNOS心脏移植分配政策变化导致等待时间缩短以及临时MCS设备使用增加。政策变化后,1000天时的累积生存率下降。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3918/11367637/4a4fd3425d0d/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3918/11367637/16f04d53f24f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3918/11367637/22136eea2c34/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3918/11367637/17a1055fa7ce/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3918/11367637/2998ee3478a6/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3918/11367637/4a4fd3425d0d/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3918/11367637/16f04d53f24f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3918/11367637/22136eea2c34/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3918/11367637/17a1055fa7ce/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3918/11367637/2998ee3478a6/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3918/11367637/4a4fd3425d0d/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
Survival trends in heart transplant patients supported on ECMO and IABP: A 10-year UNOS database analysis.接受体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)和主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)支持的心脏移植患者的生存趋势:一项为期10年的器官共享联合网络(UNOS)数据库分析。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024 Aug 13;54:101486. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101486. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Characterizing Adaptive Changes and Patient Survival After 2018 Donor Allocation Restructuring: A UNOS Database Analysis.2018 年供者分配结构调整后适应性变化及患者生存情况分析:UNOS 数据库分析
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2024 Jun 1;23(2):81-88. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000359. Epub 2024 May 22.
3
Impact of UNOS allocation policy changes on utilization and outcomes of patients bridged to heart transplant with intra-aortic balloon pump.器官共享联合网络(UNOS)分配政策变化对使用主动脉内球囊反搏过渡到心脏移植的患者的利用情况和结局的影响
Clin Transplant. 2022 Feb;36(2):e14533. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14533. Epub 2021 Nov 28.
4
Acceptable Post-Heart Transplant Outcomes Support Temporary MCS Prioritization in the New OPTN|UNOS Heart Allocation Policy.可接受的心脏移植术后结果支持在新的 OPTN|UNOS 心脏分配政策中优先考虑临时 MCS。
Transplant Proc. 2021 Jan-Feb;53(1):353-357. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.04.1819. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
5
The impact of the United Network of Organ Sharing allocation change on waitlist trajectories of inpatients listed with inotropic support: A single-center analysis.器官共享联合网络分配变化对接受强心支持的住院患者等待名单轨迹的影响:一项单中心分析。
Clin Transplant. 2023 Jan;37(1):e14834. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14834. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
6
Regional differences in recipient waitlist time and pre- and post-transplant mortality after the 2006 United Network for Organ Sharing policy changes in the donor heart allocation algorithm.2006年器官共享联合网络(United Network for Organ Sharing)对供体心脏分配算法进行政策调整后,受者等待名单时间以及移植前后死亡率的地区差异。
JACC Heart Fail. 2014 Apr;2(2):166-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2013.11.005.
7
UNOS listing status-related changes in mechanical circulatory support utilization and outcomes in adult congenital heart disease patients.UNOS 对成人先天性心脏病患者机械循环支持利用和结局的与名单相关的变化进行了登记。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2022 Jul;41(7):889-895. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.03.001. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
8
Effect of UNOS policy change and exception status request on outcomes in patients bridged to heart transplant with an intra-aortic balloon pump.UNOS 政策变化和例外状态请求对使用主动脉内球囊泵桥接心脏移植患者结局的影响。
Artif Organs. 2022 May;46(5):838-849. doi: 10.1111/aor.14109. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
9
Three-year outcomes after bridge to transplantation ECMO-pre- and post-2018 UNOS revised heart allocation system.桥接移植 ECMO 后三年的结果:2018 年 UNOS 修订心脏分配系统前后。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Nov;43(11):1838-1845. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.07.025. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
10
Three-Year Left Ventricular Assist Device Outcomes and Strategy After Heart Transplant Allocation Score Change.心脏移植分配评分改变后三年左心室辅助装置的结果和策略。
Am J Cardiol. 2024 Sep 1;226:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.07.001. Epub 2024 Jul 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of New UNOS Allocation Criteria on Heart Transplant Practices and Outcomes.新的器官共享联合网络分配标准对心脏移植实践及结果的影响。
Transplant Direct. 2020 Dec 15;7(1):e642. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001088. eCollection 2021 Jan.
2
Evolving Trends in Adult Heart Transplant With the 2018 Heart Allocation Policy Change.2018 年心脏分配政策变化后成人心脏移植的发展趋势。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Feb 1;6(2):159-167. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.4909.
3
Changes in the United States Adult Heart Allocation Policy: Challenges and Opportunities.
美国成人心脏分配政策的变化:挑战与机遇
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Oct;13(10):e005795. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005795. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
4
Outcomes in the 2018 UNOS donor heart allocation system: A perspective on disparate analyses.2018 年 UNOS 供体心脏分配系统的结果:对不同分析方法的看法。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020 Nov;39(11):1191-1194. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2020.08.012. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
5
Outcomes of the First 1300 Adult Heart Transplants in the United States After the Allocation Policy Change.美国分配政策改变后首批1300例成人心脏移植的结果。
Circulation. 2020 May 19;141(20):1662-1664. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.045354. Epub 2020 May 18.
6
Reassessing Recipient Mortality Under the New Heart Allocation System: An Updated UNOS Registry Analysis.重新评估新心脏分配系统下的受者死亡率:UNOS 登记分析的更新。
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Jul;8(7):548-556. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.03.010. Epub 2020 May 14.
7
A change of heart: Preliminary results of the US 2018 adult heart allocation revision.心动之变:美国 2018 年成人心脏分配修订的初步结果。
Am J Transplant. 2020 Oct;20(10):2781-2790. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16010. Epub 2020 Jun 14.
8
Axillary Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Migration Into the Left Ventricle During Peripheral Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support.外周静脉动脉体外膜肺氧合支持期间腋动脉主动脉内球囊泵移入左心室
Circ Heart Fail. 2020 May;13(5):e007017. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.007017. Epub 2020 May 1.
9
Organ allocation in the age of the algorithm: avoiding futile transplantation - utility in allocation.算法时代的器官分配:避免无效移植 - 分配中的效用。
Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2020 Jun;25(3):305-309. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000752.
10
Use of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Management of Cardiogenic Shock Before and After the United Network for Organ Sharing Donor Heart Allocation System Changes.使用临时机械循环支持在器官共享联合网络供心分配系统改变前后管理心原性休克。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Jun 1;5(6):703-708. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0692.