• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于多因素多基因风险评分的2型糖尿病综合临床风险预测

Integrated clinical risk prediction of type 2 diabetes with a multifactorial polygenic risk score.

作者信息

Ritchie Scott C, Taylor Henry J, Liang Yujian, Manikpurage Hasanga D, Pennells Lisa, Foguet Carles, Abraham Gad, Gibson Joel T, Jiang Xilin, Liu Yang, Xu Yu, Kim Lois G, Mahajan Anubha, McCarthy Mark I, Kaptoge Stephen, Lambert Samuel A, Wood Angela, Sim Xueling, Collins Francis S, Denny Joshua C, Danesh John, Butterworth Adam S, Di Angelantonio Emanuele, Inouye Michael

机构信息

Cambridge Baker Systems Genomics Initiative, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Cambridge Baker Systems Genomics Initiative, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

medRxiv. 2024 Sep 23:2024.08.22.24312440. doi: 10.1101/2024.08.22.24312440.

DOI:
10.1101/2024.08.22.24312440
PMID:39228710
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11370520/
Abstract

Combining information from multiple GWASs for a disease and its risk factors has proven a powerful approach for development of polygenic risk scores (PRSs). This may be particularly useful for type 2 diabetes (T2D), a highly polygenic and heterogeneous disease where the additional predictive value of a PRS is unclear. Here, we use a meta-scoring approach to develop a metaPRS for T2D that incorporated genome-wide associations from both European and non-European genetic ancestries and T2D risk factors. We evaluated the performance of this metaPRS and benchmarked it against existing genome-wide PRS in 620,059 participants and 50,572 T2D cases amongst six diverse genetic ancestries from UK Biobank, INTERVAL, the All of Us Research Program, and the Singapore Multi-Ethnic Cohort. We show that our metaPRS was the most powerful PRS for predicting T2D in European population-based cohorts and had comparable performance to the top ancestry-specific PRS, highlighting its transferability. In UK Biobank, we show the metaPRS had stronger predictive power for 10-year risk than all individual risk factors apart from BMI and biomarkers of dysglycemia. The metaPRS modestly improved T2D risk stratification of QDiabetes risk scores for 10-year risk prediction, particularly when prioritising individuals for blood tests of dysglycemia. Overall, we present a highly predictive and transferrable PRS for T2D and demonstrate that the potential for PRS to incrementally improve T2D risk prediction when incorporated into UK guideline-recommended screening and risk prediction with a clinical risk score.

摘要

将多种全基因组关联研究(GWAS)中关于一种疾病及其风险因素的信息结合起来,已被证明是开发多基因风险评分(PRS)的有效方法。这对于2型糖尿病(T2D)可能特别有用,因为T2D是一种高度多基因且异质性的疾病,PRS的额外预测价值尚不清楚。在这里,我们使用一种元评分方法来开发一种针对T2D的元PRS,该元PRS纳入了来自欧洲和非欧洲遗传血统以及T2D风险因素的全基因组关联。我们在来自英国生物银行、INTERVAL、我们所有人研究计划和新加坡多民族队列的六个不同遗传血统的620,059名参与者和50,572例T2D病例中评估了这种元PRS的性能,并将其与现有的全基因组PRS进行了基准测试。我们表明,我们的元PRS是欧洲人群队列中预测T2D最有效的PRS,并且与顶级血统特异性PRS具有相当的性能,突出了其可转移性。在英国生物银行中,我们表明,除了BMI和血糖异常生物标志物外,元PRS对10年风险的预测能力比所有个体风险因素都更强。元PRS适度改善了QDiabetes风险评分对10年风险预测的T2D风险分层,特别是在对血糖异常血液检测的个体进行优先排序时。总体而言,我们提出了一种针对T2D的高度预测性和可转移的PRS,并证明了将PRS纳入英国指南推荐的筛查和临床风险评分进行风险预测时,其逐步改善T2D风险预测的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71b4/11421107/c208056186b1/nihpp-2024.08.22.24312440v3-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71b4/11421107/df5aea0c9518/nihpp-2024.08.22.24312440v3-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71b4/11421107/717ecefc18c2/nihpp-2024.08.22.24312440v3-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71b4/11421107/6950a56bf1ee/nihpp-2024.08.22.24312440v3-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71b4/11421107/6cc69e99a0ab/nihpp-2024.08.22.24312440v3-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71b4/11421107/c208056186b1/nihpp-2024.08.22.24312440v3-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71b4/11421107/df5aea0c9518/nihpp-2024.08.22.24312440v3-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71b4/11421107/717ecefc18c2/nihpp-2024.08.22.24312440v3-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71b4/11421107/6950a56bf1ee/nihpp-2024.08.22.24312440v3-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71b4/11421107/6cc69e99a0ab/nihpp-2024.08.22.24312440v3-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71b4/11421107/c208056186b1/nihpp-2024.08.22.24312440v3-f0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Integrated clinical risk prediction of type 2 diabetes with a multifactorial polygenic risk score.基于多因素多基因风险评分的2型糖尿病综合临床风险预测
medRxiv. 2024 Sep 23:2024.08.22.24312440. doi: 10.1101/2024.08.22.24312440.
2
Precision Medicine in Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: Clinical Validation of Multi-Ancestry Polygenic Risk Scores in a U.S. Cohort.心血管疾病预防中的精准医学:美国队列中多血统多基因风险评分的临床验证
Nutrients. 2025 Mar 6;17(5):926. doi: 10.3390/nu17050926.
3
Development and validation of a trans-ancestry polygenic risk score for type 2 diabetes in diverse populations.在不同人群中开发和验证 2 型糖尿病的跨种族多基因风险评分。
Genome Med. 2022 Jun 29;14(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13073-022-01074-2.
4
Development and validation of a lung cancer polygenic risk score incorporating susceptibility variants for risk factors.纳入危险因素易感性变异的肺癌多基因风险评分的开发与验证
Int J Cancer. 2025 Mar 1;156(5):953-963. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35210. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
5
Integrating polygenic risk scores in the prediction of type 2 diabetes risk and subtypes in British Pakistanis and Bangladeshis: A population-based cohort study.将多基因风险评分整合到英国巴基斯坦裔和孟加拉裔 2 型糖尿病风险和亚型的预测中:一项基于人群的队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2022 May 19;19(5):e1003981. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003981. eCollection 2022 May.
6
Polygenic risk scores for the prediction of common cancers in East Asians: A population-based prospective cohort study.基于人群的前瞻性队列研究:东亚常见癌症的多基因风险评分预测。
Elife. 2023 Mar 27;12:e82608. doi: 10.7554/eLife.82608.
7
Ancestry effects on type 2 diabetes genetic risk inference in Hispanic/Latino populations.祖源对西班牙裔/拉丁裔人群 2 型糖尿病遗传风险推断的影响。
BMC Med Genet. 2020 Jun 25;21(Suppl 2):132. doi: 10.1186/s12881-020-01068-0.
8
An Improved Genome-Wide Polygenic Score Model for Predicting the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes.一种用于预测2型糖尿病风险的改进的全基因组多基因评分模型
Front Genet. 2021 Feb 11;12:632385. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.632385. eCollection 2021.
9
Impact of the trans-ancestry polygenic risk score on type 2 diabetes risk, onset age and progression among population in Taiwan.跨种族多基因风险评分对台湾人群 2 型糖尿病风险、发病年龄和进展的影响。
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2024 May 1;326(5):E547-E554. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00252.2023. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
10
Evaluation of optimal methods and ancestries for calculating polygenic risk scores in East Asian population.评估东亚人群计算多基因风险评分的最佳方法和祖源。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 6;13(1):19195. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45859-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Usefulness of the Córdoba Equation for Estimating Body Fat When Determining the Level of Risk of Developing Diabetes Type 2 or Prediabetes.在确定2型糖尿病或糖尿病前期发病风险水平时,科尔多瓦方程在估算体脂方面的实用性。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Mar 27;61(4):613. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040613.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of polygenic scoring methods in five biobanks shows larger variation between biobanks than methods and finds benefits of ensemble learning.五项生物库中多基因评分方法的评估显示,生物库之间的差异大于方法之间的差异,并发现了集成学习的益处。
Am J Hum Genet. 2024 Jul 11;111(7):1431-1447. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.06.003. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
2
shaPRS: Leveraging shared genetic effects across traits or ancestries improves accuracy of polygenic scores.shaPRS:利用跨性状或祖源的共享遗传效应可提高多基因评分的准确性。
Am J Hum Genet. 2024 Jun 6;111(6):1006-1017. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.04.009. Epub 2024 May 3.
3
Integrative polygenic risk score improves the prediction accuracy of complex traits and diseases.
整合多基因风险评分可提高复杂性状和疾病的预测准确性。
Cell Genom. 2024 Apr 10;4(4):100523. doi: 10.1016/j.xgen.2024.100523. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
4
Selection, optimization and validation of ten chronic disease polygenic risk scores for clinical implementation in diverse US populations.选择、优化和验证十种用于美国不同人群临床应用的慢性病多基因风险评分。
Nat Med. 2024 Feb;30(2):480-487. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-02796-z. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
5
Genetic drivers of heterogeneity in type 2 diabetes pathophysiology.2 型糖尿病病理生理学异质性的遗传驱动因素。
Nature. 2024 Mar;627(8003):347-357. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07019-6. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
6
Genomic data in the All of Us Research Program.全美国研究计划中的基因组数据。
Nature. 2024 Mar;627(8003):340-346. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06957-x. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
7
Clinical utility of polygenic scores for cardiometabolic disease in Arabs.多基因风险评分在阿拉伯人心血管代谢疾病中的临床效用。
Nat Commun. 2023 Oct 18;14(1):6535. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41985-1.
8
Principles and methods for transferring polygenic risk scores across global populations.多基因风险评分在全球人群中的转移原理和方法。
Nat Rev Genet. 2024 Jan;25(1):8-25. doi: 10.1038/s41576-023-00637-2. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
9
Global, regional, and national burden of diabetes from 1990 to 2021, with projections of prevalence to 2050: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.全球、地区和国家 1990 年至 2021 年糖尿病负担,以及对 2050 年患病率的预测:2021 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2023 Jul 15;402(10397):203-234. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01301-6. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
10
Polygenic scoring accuracy varies across the genetic ancestry continuum.多基因评分准确性在遗传祖先连续体上有所差异。
Nature. 2023 Jun;618(7966):774-781. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06079-4. Epub 2023 May 17.