Physical Education and Health Education, Udon Thani Rajabhat University, Muang, Thailand.
J Sports Sci Med. 2024 Sep 1;23(1):638-646. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2024.638. eCollection 2024 Sep.
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of 8 weeks of small-sided basketball games (SSG) training using baskets (SSGbk) and ball possession games without baskets (SSGbpg) on various neuromuscular parameters in young male basketball players. Specifically, the study examined unilateral isometric knee flexor strength (KFS), unilateral isometric knee extensor strength (KES), bilateral countermovement jump peak power and peak landing force (CMJ), and leg land and hold test (LHT) peak landing force. This randomized controlled study included two experimental groups (SSGbk and SSGbpg) and one control group. Fifty regional competitive-level male youth basketball players (16.7 ± 0.5 years) were assigned to the groups. The experimental groups participated in two additional SSG weekly training sessions over 8 weeks. Both experimental groups were exposed to the same 2v2 to 4v4 formats of play and training volume, with the only difference being that one group performed ball possession games while the other participated in games targeting to score in the basket. Players were evaluated twice: once at baseline in the week prior to the intervention period, and again in the week post-intervention. The neuromuscular tests were conducted using force platforms. Significant interactions between time and groups were observed in KES ( < 0.001; η = 0.902), KFS ( < 0.001; η = 0.880), and CMJ peak power ( < 0.001; η = 0.630). Significant differences between groups were found post-intervention for the variables of KES ( = 0.017; η = 0.159), KFS ( = 0.011; η = 0.174), CMJ peak power ( = 0.017; η = 0.160), CMJ peak landing force ( = 0.020; η = 0.154), and LHT peak power ( = 0.012; η = 0.171). In conclusion, our study highlights that the SSGbk significantly increases neuromuscular adaptations in young male basketball players. Conversely, our findings do not support the efficacy of SSGbpg in targeting these specific physical fitness variables. Therefore, the use of SSGs must be carefully considered, particularly in selecting task conditions, to ensure efficacy in interventions.
本研究旨在比较 8 周小场地篮球比赛（SSG）训练使用篮筐（SSGbk）和无篮筐的控球比赛（SSGbpg）对年轻男性篮球运动员各项神经肌肉参数的影响。具体而言，该研究检测了单侧等长膝屈肌力量（KFS）、单侧等长膝伸肌力量（KES）、双侧反向跳峰功率和峰着地力（CMJ）以及腿部着地和保持测试（LHT）峰着地力。这项随机对照研究包括两个实验组（SSGbk 和 SSGbpg）和一个对照组。50 名地区竞技水平的男性青年篮球运动员（16.7 ± 0.5 岁）被分配到各个组。实验组在 8 周内每周额外参加 2 次 SSG 训练。两组均采用 2v2 至 4v4 的相同比赛和训练量格式，唯一的区别是一组进行控球比赛，另一组则参加投篮得分的比赛。球员在两次评估中接受评估：一次是在干预期前一周的基线，另一次是在干预后一周。神经肌肉测试使用测力台进行。KES（<0.001；η=0.902）、KFS（<0.001；η=0.880）和 CMJ 峰功率（<0.001；η=0.630）方面观察到时间和组之间的显著交互作用。干预后，KES（=0.017；η=0.159）、KFS（=0.011；η=0.174）、CMJ 峰功率（=0.017；η=0.160）、CMJ 峰着地力（=0.020；η=0.154）和 LHT 峰功率（=0.012；η=0.171）的变量在组间存在显著差异。综上所述，我们的研究表明，SSGbk 可显著增强年轻男性篮球运动员的神经肌肉适应能力。相反，我们的研究结果并不支持 SSGbpg 针对这些特定体能变量的有效性。因此，在选择任务条件时，必须谨慎考虑 SSG 的使用，以确保干预的有效性。
