Department of Physical Activity Sciences, Universidad de Los Lagos, Osorno 5290000, Chile; Centro de Investigación en Fisiología del Ejercicio, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Mayor, Santiago 7500000, Chile.
Navarrabiomed, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra (CHN), Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), IdiSNA, Pamplona 31008, Spain; Laboratorio de Ciencias de la Actividad Física, el Deporte y la Salud, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, USACH, Santiago 9170020, Chile.
J Sport Health Sci. 2022 Nov;11(6):656-670. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.12.005. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
There is a growing body of experimental evidence examining the effects of plyometric jump training (PJT) on physical fitness attributes in basketball players; however, this evidence has not yet been comprehensively and systematically aggregated. Therefore, our objective was to meta-analyze the effects of PJT on physical fitness attributes in basketball players, in comparison to a control condition.
A systematic literature search was conducted in the databases PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, up to July 2020. Peer-reviewed controlled trials with baseline and follow-up measurements investigating the effects of PJT on physical fitness attributes (muscle power, i.e., jumping performance, linear sprint speed, change-of-direction speed, balance, and muscle strength) in basketball players, with no restrictions on their playing level, sex, or age. Hedge's g effect sizes (ES) were calculated for physical fitness variables. Using a random-effects model, potential sources of heterogeneity were selected, including subgroup analyses (age, sex, body mass, and height) and single training factor analysis (program duration, training frequency, and total number of training sessions). Computation of meta-regression was also performed.
Thirty-two studies were included, involving 818 total basketball players. Significant (p < 0.05) small-to-large effects of PJT were evident on vertical jump power (ES = 0.45), countermovement jump height with (ES = 1.24) and without arm swing (ES = 0.88), squat jump height (ES = 0.80), drop jump height (ES = 0.53), horizontal jump distance (ES = 0.65), linear sprint time across distances ≤10 m (ES = 1.67) and >10 m (ES = 0.92), change-of-direction performance time across distances ≤40 m (ES = 1.15) and >40 m (ES = 1.02), dynamic (ES = 1.16) and static balance (ES = 1.48), and maximal strength (ES = 0.57). The meta-regression revealed that training duration, training frequency, and total number of sessions completed did not predict the effects of PJT on physical fitness attributes. Subgroup analysis indicated greater improvements in older compared to younger players in horizontal jump distance (>17.15 years, ES = 2.11; ≤17.15 years, ES = 0.10; p < 0.001), linear sprint time >10 m (>16.3 years, ES = 1.83; ≤16.3 years, ES = 0.36; p = 0.010), and change-of-direction performance time ≤40 m (>16.3 years, ES = 1.65; ≤16.3 years, ES = 0.75; p = 0.005). Greater increases in horizontal jump distance were apparent with >2 compared with ≤2 weekly PJT sessions (ES = 2.12 and ES = 0.39, respectively; p < 0.001).
Data from 32 studies (28 of which demonstrate moderate-to-high methodological quality) indicate PJT improves muscle power, linear sprint speed, change-of-direction speed, balance, and muscle strength in basketball players independent of sex, age, or PJT program variables. However, the beneficial effects of PJT as measured by horizontal jump distance, linear sprint time >10 m, and change-of-direction performance time ≤40 m, appear to be more evident among older basketball players.
越来越多的实验证据研究了增强式跳跃训练(PJT)对篮球运动员身体素质属性的影响;然而,这些证据尚未得到全面和系统的综合。因此,我们的目的是对 PJT 对篮球运动员身体素质属性的影响进行荟萃分析,与对照组进行比较。
我们在 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Scopus 数据库中进行了系统的文献检索,检索时间截至 2020 年 7 月。纳入了基线和随访测量的同行评审对照试验,研究了 PJT 对篮球运动员身体素质属性(肌肉力量,即跳跃表现、线性冲刺速度、变向速度、平衡和肌肉力量)的影响,对其运动水平、性别或年龄没有限制。计算了身体素质变量的 Hedge's g 效应大小(ES)。使用随机效应模型,选择了潜在的异质性来源,包括亚组分析(年龄、性别、体重和身高)和单一训练因素分析(方案持续时间、训练频率和总训练次数)。还进行了元回归计算。
共纳入 32 项研究,涉及 818 名篮球运动员。PJT 对垂直跳跃力量(ES=0.45)、带臂摆动(ES=1.24)和不带臂摆动(ES=0.88)的深蹲跳高度、深蹲跳高度(ES=0.80)、跳深高度(ES=0.53)、水平跳跃距离(ES=0.65)、10 m 以内(ES=1.67)和 10 m 以上(ES=0.92)的线性冲刺时间、≤40 m (ES=1.15)和>40 m(ES=1.02)的变向表现时间、动态(ES=1.16)和静态平衡(ES=1.48)、最大力量(ES=0.57)均有显著(p<0.05)的小到中等效应。元回归显示,训练持续时间、训练频率和完成的总训练次数并不能预测 PJT 对身体素质属性的影响。亚组分析表明,与年轻球员相比,年龄较大的球员在水平跳跃距离(>17.15 岁,ES=2.11;≤17.15 岁,ES=0.10;p<0.001)、10 m 以上线性冲刺时间(>16.3 岁,ES=1.83;≤16.3 岁,ES=0.36;p=0.010)和≤40 m 变向表现时间(>16.3 岁,ES=1.65;≤16.3 岁,ES=0.75;p=0.005)方面的改善更大。每周进行>2 次与≤2 次 PJT 训练相比,水平跳跃距离的增加更为明显(ES=2.12 和 ES=0.39,分别;p<0.001)。
来自 32 项研究的数据(其中 28 项研究显示出中等至高度的方法学质量)表明,PJT 可改善篮球运动员的肌肉力量、线性冲刺速度、变向速度、平衡和肌肉力量,无论其性别、年龄或 PJT 方案变量如何。然而,水平跳跃距离、10 m 以上线性冲刺时间和≤40 m 变向表现时间的有益效果似乎在年龄较大的篮球运动员中更为明显。