Wang Yuan-Yuan, Tian Fang, Qian Xiao-Lu, Ying Hui-Min, Zhou Zhen-Feng
Department of Endocrinology, Xixi Hospital of Hangzhou, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Department of Anesthesiology, Hangzhou Women's Hospital (Hangzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Hangzhou First People's Hospital Qianjiang New City Campus, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University), Hangzhou, China.
Front Nutr. 2024 Aug 20;11:1439473. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1439473. eCollection 2024.
Both 5:2 IF diet (intermittent fasting) and daily caloric restriction eating had been suggested for management of MAFLD (Metabolic-Associated Fatty Liver Disease), this study aimed to evaluate the effects of 5:2 IF diet on body weight and metabolic parameters in adults with MAFLD, in comparison to daily caloric restriction eating.
This single-center, double-blind, prospective, randomized controlled trial included 60 patients with MAFLD, who were administered either a 5:2 IF diet limited calories consumed for 2 days each week with no restrictions on the remaining 5 (Group 5:2 IF diet) or a daily calorie restriction eating (Group daily calorie restriction). Fibrotouch-B instrument assessment, ultrasound assessment of hepatic steatosis, anthropometric indices and body composition analysis, blood sample measurements were conducted during two distinct visits: initially on the day of study commencement (T1), and subsequently at the conclusion of the 12-week intervention period (T2).
In comparison to daily calorie restriction eating, the 5:2 IF diet significantly decreased the proportion of hepatic steatosis ≥moderate (29.6% vs. 59.3%, = 0.028) and the degree of hepatic fibrosis ≥ 2 (3.7% vs. 25.9%, = 0.05), and fewer percentage of patients were diagnosed with fatty liver via upper abdominal ultrasound in the 5:2 intermittent fasting diet group (33.3% vs. 63.0%, = 0.029). Additionally, the CAP (controlled attenuation parameter) and LSM (liver stiffness measurements) value were significantly lower in the 5:2 IF diet group ( < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of weight, BMI (body mass index), WC (waist circumference), HC (hip circumference), and WHR (waist to hip ratio). Similarly, there were no significant differences in lipid profile, glycemic indices and adverse events ( > 0.05).
In summary, although both 5:2 IF diet and daily caloric restriction eating achieved similar effect on body weight, liver enzymes, lipid profile and glycemic indices after 12 weeks treatment, 5:2 IF diet demonstrates better improvement in fibrosis and steatosis scores independently from weight regulation. Consequently, it is anticipated to emerge as a viable dietary modality for lifestyle intervention among patients diagnosed with MAFLD.
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier ChiCTR2400080292.
5:2间歇性禁食饮食(IF饮食)和每日热量限制饮食均被建议用于管理代谢相关脂肪性肝病(MAFLD),本研究旨在评估5:2 IF饮食与每日热量限制饮食相比,对MAFLD成年患者体重和代谢参数的影响。
这项单中心、双盲、前瞻性、随机对照试验纳入了60例MAFLD患者,他们被给予以下两种饮食方案之一:一种是5:2 IF饮食,即每周2天限制热量摄入,其余5天不限制(5:2 IF饮食组);另一种是每日热量限制饮食(每日热量限制组)。在两个不同的访视期间进行Fibrotouch-B仪器评估、肝脏脂肪变性的超声评估、人体测量指标和身体成分分析、血液样本检测:最初在研究开始当天(T1),随后在12周干预期结束时(T2)。
与每日热量限制饮食相比,5:2 IF饮食显著降低了中度及以上肝脏脂肪变性的比例(29.6%对59.3%,P = 0.028)和肝纤维化程度≥2级的比例(3.7%对25.9%,P = 0.05),并且在5:2间歇性禁食饮食组中,通过上腹部超声诊断为脂肪肝的患者比例更低(33.3%对63.0%,P = 0.029)。此外,5:2 IF饮食组的受控衰减参数(CAP)和肝脏硬度测量值(LSM)显著更低(P < 0.05)。两组在体重、体重指数(BMI)、腰围(WC)、臀围(HC)和腰臀比(WHR)方面未观察到统计学显著差异。同样,在血脂谱、血糖指标和不良事件方面也没有显著差异(P > 0.05)。
总之,尽管5:2 IF饮食和每日热量限制饮食在12周治疗后对体重、肝酶、血脂谱和血糖指标产生了相似的影响,但5:2 IF饮食在不依赖体重调节的情况下,对纤维化和脂肪变性评分有更好的改善。因此,预计它将成为诊断为MAFLD患者生活方式干预的一种可行饮食方式。