• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SMILE 量表:一种用于癌症患者的健康行为工具。

The SMILE scale: a wellness behavioral tool for patients with cancer.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, 535 Barnhill Drive, Suite 473, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.

Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2024 Dec;33(12):3401-3408. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03781-2. Epub 2024 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-024-03781-2
PMID:39230840
Abstract

PURPOSE

As cancer survivorship increases, there is a need for simple tools to measure and promote healthy behaviors. We created a wellness behavioral tool (the SMILE Scale) to encourage self-monitoring of wellness behaviors. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of collecting daily self-reported SMILE Scale data and weekly quality of life data among patients with cancer. We also aimed to measure the association between SMILE Scale responses and validated health-related quality of life (HRQOL) tools (PROMIS-29 + 2 and SymTrak-8) as a pilot test of the hypothesis that increased wellness behaviors may impact quality of life.

METHODS

We surveyed 100 patients with cancer at the Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center. Participants were asked to complete daily SMILE Scale assessments over a two-week period, as well as weekly PROMIS-29 + 2 and SymTrak-8 surveys. The primary endpoint was the SMILE Scale completion rate. Secondary endpoints in this single-arm pilot study included correlations between the SMILE Scale and other HRQOL tools.

RESULTS

Daily completion rate of the SMILE Scale ranged from 57% to 65% of participants over a 14-day period. Among the 61% of participants who completed SMILE on day 1, 87% completed SMILE on 10 of 14 days. By end of study, participants who self-reported more wellness behaviors (i.e., higher daily SMILE scores) demonstrated significantly higher PROMIS physical health (p = 0.003), higher PROMIS mental health (p = 0.008), and lower (better) SymTrak total symptom burden (p = 0.006). Further, among those who completed at least 1 of 14 daily SMILE assessments, quality of life significantly improved over the two-week period for PROMIS mental health (p = 0.018) and SymTrak total symptom burden (p = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

The SMILE Scale completion rate did not satisfy our pre-planned ≥70% threshold for feasibility; however, the rate for completing SMILE at least once during the 14 days (77%) met this threshold. Participants with higher average daily SMILE scores had significantly better scores across other validated HRQOL tools. While these results may be correlative and not causative, this suggests a potential physical and mental health benefit for delivering the SMILE Scale in clinical practice to help encourage healthy behaviors and warrants testing the SMILE Scale's impact in future studies.

摘要

目的

随着癌症生存人数的增加,需要简单的工具来衡量和促进健康行为。我们创建了一个健康行为工具(SMILE 量表),以鼓励对健康行为进行自我监测。本研究旨在确定在癌症患者中每天收集自我报告的 SMILE 量表数据和每周生活质量数据的可行性。我们还旨在衡量 SMILE 量表反应与经过验证的健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)工具(PROMIS-29 + 2 和 SymTrak-8)之间的相关性,作为增加健康行为可能影响生活质量的假设的初步测试。

方法

我们在印第安纳大学西蒙综合癌症中心调查了 100 名癌症患者。参与者被要求在两周内完成每日 SMILE 量表评估,以及每周 PROMIS-29 + 2 和 SymTrak-8 调查。主要终点是 SMILE 量表的完成率。本单臂试验研究的次要终点包括 SMILE 量表与其他 HRQOL 工具之间的相关性。

结果

在 14 天的时间内,SMILE 量表的每日完成率在参与者中从 57%到 65%不等。在第一天完成 SMILE 的 61%的参与者中,有 87%在 14 天中的 10 天完成了 SMILE。到研究结束时,自我报告更多健康行为(即更高的每日 SMILE 得分)的参与者表现出更高的 PROMIS 身体健康(p = 0.003)、更高的 PROMIS 心理健康(p = 0.008)和更低的(更好)SymTrak 总症状负担(p = 0.006)。此外,在至少完成 14 天每日 SMILE 评估中的 1 次的参与者中,PROMIS 心理健康(p = 0.018)和 SymTrak 总症状负担(p = 0.014)在两周内的生活质量显著改善。

结论

SMILE 量表的完成率没有满足我们预先计划的≥70%的可行性阈值;然而,在 14 天内至少完成一次 SMILE 的比例(77%)达到了这一阈值。平均每日 SMILE 得分较高的参与者在其他经过验证的 HRQOL 工具中得分明显更好。虽然这些结果可能是相关的而不是因果关系的,但这表明在临床实践中提供 SMILE 量表可能对促进健康行为有潜在的身心健康益处,并值得在未来的研究中测试 SMILE 量表的影响。

相似文献

1
The SMILE scale: a wellness behavioral tool for patients with cancer.SMILE 量表:一种用于癌症患者的健康行为工具。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Dec;33(12):3401-3408. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03781-2. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
2
Utilizing Digital Health to Collect Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes in Prostate Cancer: Single-Arm Pilot Trial.利用数字健康收集前列腺癌患者自我报告的电子结局:单臂试点试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Mar 25;22(3):e12689. doi: 10.2196/12689.
3
Evaluating Feasibility and Acceptability of the "My HeartHELP" Mobile App for Promoting Heart-Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors: Mixed Methods Study.评估“My HeartHELP”移动应用程序促进心脏健康生活方式行为的可行性和可接受性:混合方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 May 2;9:e66108. doi: 10.2196/66108.
4
Influence of wellness education on first-line icotinib hydrochloride patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer and their family caregivers.健康宣教对一线盐酸埃克替尼治疗的IV期非小细胞肺癌患者及其家庭照顾者的影响
Curr Probl Cancer. 2018 May-Jun;42(3):358-366. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2018.03.006. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
5
Wellness Coaching: An Intervention to Increase Healthy Behavior in Breast Cancer Survivors.健康促进教练:提高乳腺癌幸存者健康行为的干预措施。
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2020 Jun 1;24(3):305-315. doi: 10.1188/20.CJON.305-315.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Development and Feasibility of SymTrak, aMulti-domain Tool for Monitoring Symptoms of Older Adults in Primary Care.SymTrak 的开发与可行性:一种用于监测初级保健中老年患者症状的多领域工具
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jun;34(6):915-922. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4772-4. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
8
The EORTC QLU-C10D distinguished better between cancer patients and the general population than PROPr and EQ-5D-5L in a cross-sectional study.在一项横断面研究中,与PROPr和EQ-5D-5L相比,欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷核心10项(EORTC QLU-C10D)能更好地区分癌症患者和普通人群。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Jan;177:111592. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111592. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
9
Physical exercise, vegetable and fruit intake and health-related quality of life in Chinese breast cancer survivors: a cross-sectional study.中国乳腺癌幸存者的体育锻炼、蔬菜水果摄入量与健康相关生活质量:一项横断面研究。
Qual Life Res. 2017 Jun;26(6):1541-1550. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1496-6. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
10
The impact of an employee wellness programme in clothing/textile manufacturing companies: a randomised controlled trial.服装/纺织制造企业员工健康计划的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jan 11;13:25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-25.

本文引用的文献

1
The Role of Diet in Prognosis among Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Dietary Patterns and Diet Interventions.饮食在癌症幸存者预后中的作用:饮食模式和饮食干预的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nutrients. 2022 Jan 14;14(2):348. doi: 10.3390/nu14020348.
2
PAVING the Path to Wellness for Breast Cancer Survivors: Lifestyle Medicine Education and Group Interventions.为乳腺癌幸存者铺就健康之路:生活方式医学教育与团体干预
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2021 Jan 29;15(3):242-248. doi: 10.1177/1559827620986066. eCollection 2021 May-Jun.
3
Impact of Lifestyle Behaviors on Cancer Risk and Prevention.
生活方式行为对癌症风险及预防的影响。
J Lifestyle Med. 2021 Jan 31;11(1):1-7. doi: 10.15280/jlm.2021.11.1.1.
4
SymTrak-8 as a Brief Measure for Assessing Symptoms in Older Adults.SymTrak-8 作为一种评估老年人症状的简短测量工具。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 May;36(5):1197-1205. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06329-5. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
5
The psychosocial cost burden of cancer: A systematic literature review.癌症的心理社会成本负担:系统文献回顾。
Psychooncology. 2020 Nov;29(11):1746-1760. doi: 10.1002/pon.5516. Epub 2020 Sep 6.
6
Diet, nutrition, and cancer risk: what do we know and what is the way forward?饮食、营养与癌症风险:我们了解多少,未来的方向是什么?
BMJ. 2020 Mar 5;368:m511. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m511.
7
Physical Activity in Cancer Prevention and Survival: A Systematic Review.体力活动在癌症预防和生存中的作用:系统评价。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 Jun;51(6):1252-1261. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001937.
8
Sleeping hours: what is the ideal number and how does age impact this?睡眠时间:理想的睡眠时间是多少,年龄对此有何影响?
Nat Sci Sleep. 2018 Nov 27;10:421-430. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S163071. eCollection 2018.
9
Are spiritual interventions beneficial to patients with cancer?: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials following PRISMA.精神干预对癌症患者有益吗?:一项遵循PRISMA的随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Aug;97(35):e11948. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011948.
10
PROMIS-29 v2.0 profile physical and mental health summary scores.PROMIS-29 v2.0 概况身心健康综合评分。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Jul;27(7):1885-1891. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1842-3. Epub 2018 Mar 22.