Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Department of Political Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Sci Adv. 2024 Sep 6;10(36):eadm9198. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adm9198. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
The scholarly literature suggests that, as elections approach, political tensions intensify, and, as they pass, tensions return to pre-election levels. Using a massive new dataset of 66,000 interviews (cross-sectional and panel), we find that animosities are durable and consistent over the course of the 2022 US election. Individuals with more exposure to the campaign tend to be more polarized, and this sentiment endures post-election. Contrary to expectations, partisans who voted for the winning candidate are no less polarized post-election than those on the losing side. In closing, we note that the durability of polarization has important implications not only for our understanding of the scope of partisan divides but also for efforts designed to ameliorate polarization.
学术文献表明,随着选举的临近,政治紧张局势加剧,而随着选举的结束,紧张局势又回到选举前的水平。我们利用一个包含 66000 次采访(横断面和面板)的大型新数据集发现,在 2022 年美国选举期间,敌意是持久和一致的。接触竞选活动越多的人往往越两极分化,这种情绪在选举后仍会持续。与预期相反的是,投票给获胜候选人的党派人士在选举后并不比落败一方的人更两极分化。最后,我们注意到,极化的持久性不仅对我们理解党派分歧的范围有重要意义,而且对旨在缓解极化的努力也有重要意义。