Suppr超能文献

情感两极分化在美国各州均匀分布。

Affective polarization is uniformly distributed across American States.

作者信息

Holliday Derek E, Lelkes Yphtach, Westwood Sean J

机构信息

Department of Political Science, Stanford University, 616 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

Annenberg School of Communication, University of Pennsylvania, 3620 Walnut St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

PNAS Nexus. 2024 Oct 15;3(10):pgae310. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae310. eCollection 2024 Oct.

Abstract

US partisans view each other with increasing negativity. While many attribute the growth of such affective polarization to nationally cross-cutting forces, such as ideological partisan sorting or access to partisan media, others emphasize the effects of contextual and institutional forces. For the first time, we introduce and explore data sufficiently granular to fully map the extent of partisan animosity across the US states. With a massive, nationally representative survey we find that, counter to expectations, variation in affective polarization across states is relatively small, and is instead largely a function of individual-level attitudinal (but not demographic) characteristics. While elections pit regions of the country against others, our results suggest affective polarization is a national, not regional, problem, requiring national interventions.

摘要

美国的党派人士对彼此的看法越来越负面。虽然许多人将这种情感两极分化的加剧归因于全国性的交叉力量,如意识形态的党派分类或接触党派媒体,但也有人强调背景和制度力量的影响。我们首次引入并探讨了足够细致的数据,以全面描绘美国各州党派敌意的程度。通过一项大规模的、具有全国代表性的调查,我们发现,与预期相反,各州情感两极分化的差异相对较小,相反,这在很大程度上是个人层面态度(而非人口统计学)特征的函数。虽然选举使美国不同地区相互对立,但我们的结果表明,情感两极分化是一个全国性而非地区性的问题,需要全国性的干预措施。

相似文献

1
Affective polarization is uniformly distributed across American States.情感两极分化在美国各州均匀分布。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Oct 15;3(10):pgae310. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae310. eCollection 2024 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Uncommon and nonpartisan: Antidemocratic attitudes in the American public.不常见且无党派偏见的:美国公众的反民主态度。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Mar 26;121(13):e2313013121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2313013121. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
3
Affective Polarization and Misinformation Belief.情感极化与错误信息信念
Polit Behav. 2023 Jan 18:1-60. doi: 10.1007/s11109-022-09851-w.
4
How digital media drive affective polarization through partisan sorting.数字媒体如何通过党派分类推动情感极化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Oct 18;119(42):e2207159119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2207159119. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
5
Interventions to reduce partisan animosity.减少党派敌意的干预措施。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Sep;6(9):1194-1205. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01442-3. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
9
Current research overstates American support for political violence.当前的研究高估了美国民众对政治暴力的支持。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Mar 22;119(12):e2116870119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2116870119. Epub 2022 Mar 18.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验