Research Division, Cardresearch-Cardiologia Assistencial e de Pesquisa, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil; Department of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Research Division, Cardresearch-Cardiologia Assistencial e de Pesquisa, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil; Department of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2024 Sep;120(3):602-609. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.06.016. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
Algae-derived nutraceuticals, such as spirulina, have been reported to have biological activities that may minimize clinical consequences to COVID-19 infections.
This study aimed to determine whether spirulina is an effective treatment for high-risk patients with early COVID-19 in an outpatient setting.
The TOGETHER trial is a placebo-controlled, randomized, platform trial conducted in Brazil. Eligible participants were symptomatic adults with a positive rapid test for SARS-CoV-2 older than 50 y or with a known risk factor for disease severity. Patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo or spirulina (1 g twice daily for 14 d). The primary end point was hospitalization defined as either retention in a COVID-19 emergency setting for >6 h or transfer to tertiary hospital owing to COVID-19 at 28 d. Secondary outcomes included time-to-hospitalization, mortality, and adverse drug reactions. We used a Bayesian framework to compare spirulina with placebo.
We recruited 1126 participants, 569 randomly assigned to spirulina and 557 to placebo. The median age was 49.0 y, and 65.3% were female. The primary outcome occurred in 11.2% in the spirulina group and 8.1% in the placebo group (odds ratio [OR]: 1.24; 95% credible interval: 0.84, 1.86). There were no differences in emergency department visit (OR: 1.21; 95% credible interval: 0.81, 1.83), nor time to symptom relief (hazard ratio: 0.90; 95% credible interval: 0.79, 1.03). Spirulina also not demonstrate important treatment effects in the prespecified subgroups defined by age, sex, BMI, days since symptom onset, or vaccination status.
Spirulina has no any clinical benefits as an outpatient therapy for COVID-19 compared with placebo with respect to reducing the retention in an emergency setting or COVID-19-related hospitalization. There are no differences between spirulina and placebo for other secondary outcomes. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04727424.
藻类衍生的营养保健品,如螺旋藻,据报道具有减轻 COVID-19 感染临床后果的生物活性。
本研究旨在确定在门诊环境中,螺旋藻是否对 COVID-19 高危患者早期治疗有效。
TOGETHER 试验是在巴西进行的一项安慰剂对照、随机、平台试验。合格的参与者是出现症状的成年人,他们的 SARS-CoV-2 快速检测呈阳性,年龄大于 50 岁,或有疾病严重程度的已知危险因素。患者被随机分配接受安慰剂或螺旋藻(每天 2 次,每次 1 克,持续 14 天)。主要终点是 28 天内因 COVID-19 住院定义为在 COVID-19 急救环境中停留超过 6 小时或因 COVID-19 转至三级医院。次要结局包括住院时间、死亡率和药物不良反应。我们使用贝叶斯框架比较螺旋藻和安慰剂。
我们招募了 1126 名参与者,其中 569 名随机分配到螺旋藻组,557 名分到安慰剂组。中位年龄为 49.0 岁,65.3%为女性。螺旋藻组的主要结局发生率为 11.2%,安慰剂组为 8.1%(比值比[OR]:1.24;95%可信区间:0.84,1.86)。两组在急诊就诊(OR:1.21;95%可信区间:0.81,1.83)和症状缓解时间(小时比[HR]:0.90;95%可信区间:0.79,1.03)上无差异。螺旋藻在按年龄、性别、BMI、症状出现后天数或疫苗接种状态定义的预先指定亚组中也未显示出重要的治疗效果。
与安慰剂相比,螺旋藻作为 COVID-19 的门诊治疗,在减少在急诊就诊或 COVID-19 相关住院方面没有任何临床益处。螺旋藻和安慰剂在其他次要结局方面没有差异。该试验在 clinicaltrials.gov 上注册为 NCT04727424。