School of Global Development, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Department of Methodology, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Glob Public Health. 2024 Jan;19(1):2399674. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2024.2399674. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
This paper contributes to the literature on the professionalisation of NGOs in the context of the rise of 'business-minded' approaches whereby donors establish a market environment in which NGOs compete for funding by demonstrating their achievement of targets and implementing globally recognised management models. Theoretically, we use the distinction between 'economies of performance' and 'ecologies of practice' to explore how NGOs simultaneously 'perform' themselves publicly as meeting expected professional standards while simultaneously producing themselves practically through 'unprofessional' means. Limited global health and development literature addresses professionalisation as an empirical practice and experience. We report on an ethnography of a Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation-funded, HIV-targeted intervention NGO in western India, drawing on six months of participant observation and 17 interviews with NGO workers. The organisation meets 'business-minded' success criteria but does so through informal, personal, hierarchical arrangements at odds with the professionalisation model. Frontline workers are demotivated by their professionalisation experience, are suspicious of the performance of success, and find ways of achieving their vocation despite a system which they feel does not recognise the value of human relationships. Showing that 'business-minded' approaches do not necessarily rule out informal, potentially 'corrupt' ways of working, we argue against the 'professional-unprofessional' binary.
本文为 NGO 专业化研究领域做出了贡献,其背景是“注重商业思维”的方法兴起,捐赠者通过建立一个市场环境,让 NGO 竞争资金,展示他们实现目标和实施全球认可的管理模式的能力。从理论上讲,我们使用“绩效经济”和“实践生态”之间的区别,来探讨 NGO 如何在公开表现自己符合预期专业标准的同时,通过“不专业”的手段实际生产自己。有限的全球健康和发展文献将专业化作为一种经验实践和经验来讨论。我们报告了对印度西部一家比尔及梅林达·盖茨基金会资助的艾滋病毒目标干预 NGO 的民族志研究,该研究基于六个月的参与观察和对 17 名 NGO 工作人员的访谈。该组织符合“注重商业思维”的成功标准,但却是通过非正式的、个人的、与专业化模式不一致的等级制度来实现的。一线工作人员对他们的专业化经历感到不满,对成功的表现持怀疑态度,并找到了在他们认为不承认人际关系价值的系统中实现职业目标的方法。我们表明,“注重商业思维”的方法不一定排除非正式的、可能“腐败”的工作方式,反对“专业-不专业”的二分法。