Radlow R, Hurst P M
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1985;85(3):260-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00428184.
Each of 40 fasting human subjects (20 men and 20 women) consumed 1 g ethanol (absolute) per kilogram body weight as a 20% solution by volume in orange juice. The time to peak BAC was found to be 24.0 min later than the time to peak alcohol effect as measured by magnitude estimation. This difference is both large and statistically reliable. These data are compared with those in the literature which usually show these events to be synchronous. Discussion includes reasons for this empirical discrepancy, implications of the theory of acute tolerance, and plans for future research. Examination of group data shows the same general trends obtained in the analysis of individual data: alcohol-effect scores reach peak earlier than BAC for the group as a whole (n = 40), or for men alone, or for women alone. Moreover, alcohol-effect scores decline more rapidly in later trials than BAC scores, as has been reported earlier.
40名空腹的人类受试者(20名男性和20名女性)每人按每公斤体重摄入1克乙醇(纯酒精),以20%(体积比)的橙汁溶液形式饮用。通过量值估计法测得,血液酒精浓度(BAC)达到峰值的时间比酒精效应达到峰值的时间晚24.0分钟。这种差异既大且具有统计学可靠性。这些数据与文献中的数据进行了比较,文献中的数据通常表明这两个事件是同步的。讨论内容包括这种经验差异的原因、急性耐受性理论的影响以及未来研究计划。对组数据的检验表明,在个体数据分析中得到的总体趋势相同:对于整个组(n = 40)、单独的男性组或单独的女性组而言,酒精效应评分比BAC更早达到峰值。此外,正如之前所报道的,在后续试验中,酒精效应评分的下降速度比BAC评分更快。