Steltman J S, Nordmann M, Sanders D, Asjes-Tydeman W L, Dehpoor T, Tissen I, van Ommen R, Wiersma-Hartman C, van Keulen M M, Bakker D, Loudon S E, Simonsz H J
Dept. of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Ee-1667, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Public Health Services Limburg-North, Venlo, Netherlands.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 Feb;263(2):555-563. doi: 10.1007/s00417-024-06621-8. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
The relationship between refractive error at age 1 and the risk of developing amblyopia or accommodative esotropia, and the protection offered by early glasses, is unknown. These are determined in the Early Glasses Study, a prospective, population-based, longitudinal, randomized controlled study. We report baseline findings.
Healthy children aged 12-18 months were recruited at Children's Healthcare Centres (CHCs) and received an entry orthoptic examination followed by cycloplegic retinoscopy. Children with amblyopia, strabismus, ophthalmic disease or very high refractive error were excluded. Those exceeding the AAPOS 2003 Criteria (> + 3.5D spherical equivalent (SE), > 1.5D astigmatism, > 1.5D anisometropia) were randomized into wearing glasses or not, and are followed-up by research orthoptists. Other children are followed-up by regular vision screening at CHCs and visual acuity is measured in all children at age 4.
Parents of 865 children were called, 123 were excluded. Of 742 children enrolled, 601 underwent the entry orthoptic examination at age 14.5 ± 1.7 months. Mean SE was + 1.73 ± 1.18D, astigmatism -0.70 ± 0.44D, anisometropia 0.21D (IQR: 0-0.25). Of 62 (10.3%) children exceeding the Criteria, 52 were randomized into wearing glasses or not. Of 539 other children, 522 are followed up at CHCs. In total, 31 were excluded: 2 had strabismus and amblyopia, 7 strabismus, 2 amblyopia suspect, 1 strabismus suspect, 1 squinting during sinusitis, 4 excessive refractive error, 9 myopia, 2 ptosis, 1 oculomotor apraxia, 1 Duane syndrome, 1 congenital nystagmus.
Prevalence of strabismus (10/601) was as expected, but prevalence of amblyopia (2/601) was low, suggesting that common amblyopia develops later than generally thought.
What is known High refractive errors cause amblyopia, but no study has determined the exact relationship between the kind and size of refractive error at age 1 and the risk to develop amblyopia, and assessed the protective effect of glasses in a controlled, population-based, longitudinal study. What is new At baseline, 601 children received a full orthoptic examination followed by retinoscopy in cycloplegia at the age of 14.5 ± 1.7 months; 10.3% had high refractive error exceeding spherical equivalent > + 3.5D, > 1.5D astigmatism, > 1D oblique astigmatism or > 1.5D anisometropia. The prevalence of amblyopia was lower (0.3%) than expected, suggesting that most amblyopia develops after the first year of life. The prevalence of anisometropia, associated with amblyopia in older children, was low (0.8%).
1岁时的屈光不正与发生弱视或调节性内斜视风险之间的关系,以及早期配镜所提供的保护作用尚不清楚。在“早期配镜研究”中对这些问题进行了研究,这是一项基于人群的前瞻性纵向随机对照研究。我们报告基线研究结果。
在儿童保健中心招募12至18个月大的健康儿童,进行初次眼科检查,随后进行睫状肌麻痹验光。排除患有弱视、斜视、眼科疾病或屈光不正度数极高的儿童。那些超过美国小儿眼科与斜视学会(AAPOS)2003年标准(球镜等效度数(SE)>+3.5D、散光>1.5D、屈光参差>1.5D)的儿童被随机分为配镜组或非配镜组,并由研究眼科医生进行随访。其他儿童在儿童保健中心接受定期视力筛查,并在4岁时测量所有儿童的视力。
致电865名儿童的家长,排除123名。在登记的742名儿童中,601名在14.5±1.7个月时接受了初次眼科检查。平均SE为+1.73±1.18D,散光为-0.70±0.44D,屈光参差为0.21D(四分位间距:0-0.25)。在62名(10.3%)超过标准的儿童中,52名被随机分为配镜组或非配镜组。在539名其他儿童中,522名在儿童保健中心接受随访。总共排除31名:2名患有斜视和弱视,7名患有斜视,2名疑似弱视,1名疑似斜视,1名在鼻窦炎期间斜视,4名屈光不正度数过高,9名近视,2名上睑下垂,1名眼球运动失用,1名杜安综合征,1名先天性眼球震颤。
斜视患病率(10/601)与预期相符,但弱视患病率(2/601)较低,这表明常见弱视的发生时间比一般认为的要晚。
已知内容 高度屈光不正会导致弱视,但尚无研究确定1岁时屈光不正的类型和度数与发生弱视风险之间的确切关系,也未在一项基于人群的对照纵向研究中评估眼镜的保护作用。新发现 在基线时,601名儿童在14.5±1.7个月时接受了全面的眼科检查,随后进行了睫状肌麻痹验光;10.3%的儿童有高度屈光不正,超过球镜等效度数>+3.5D、散光>1.5D、斜轴散光>1D或屈光参差>1.5D。弱视患病率低于预期(0.3%),这表明大多数弱视在1岁以后发生。与大龄儿童弱视相关的屈光参差患病率较低(0.8%)。