• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

上下文和语义对象属性相互作用以支持识别记忆。

Context and semantic object properties interact to support recognition memory.

作者信息

Pandya Shirley, Nicholls Victoria I, Krugliak Alexandra, Davis Simon W, Clarke Alex

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Sep 28:17470218241283028. doi: 10.1177/17470218241283028.

DOI:10.1177/17470218241283028
PMID:39238183
Abstract

We have a great capacity to remember a large number of items, yet memory is selective. While multiple factors dictate why we remember some things and not others, it is increasingly acknowledged that some objects are more memorable than others. Recent studies show semantically distinctive objects are better remembered, as are objects located in expected scene contexts. However, we know little about how object semantics and context interact to facilitate memory. Here we test the intriguing hypothesis that these factors have complementary benefits for memory. Participants rated the congruency of object-scene pairs, followed by a surprise memory test. We show that object memory is best predicted by semantic familiarity when an object-scene pairing was congruent, but when object-scene pairings were incongruent, semantic statistics have an especially prominent impact. This demonstrates both the item and its schematic relationship to the environment interact to shape what we will and will not remember.

摘要

我们有强大的能力记住大量的事物,但记忆是有选择性的。虽然有多种因素决定我们为什么记住某些事物而不是其他事物,但人们越来越认识到有些物体比其他物体更令人难忘。最近的研究表明,语义独特的物体更容易被记住,处于预期场景中的物体也是如此。然而,我们对物体语义和上下文如何相互作用以促进记忆知之甚少。在这里,我们测试了一个有趣的假设,即这些因素对记忆有互补的益处。参与者对物体 - 场景对的一致性进行评分,随后进行突击记忆测试。我们发现,当物体 - 场景配对一致时,语义熟悉度最能预测物体记忆,但当物体 - 场景配对不一致时,语义统计有特别显著的影响。这表明物体及其与环境的示意性关系相互作用,塑造了我们会记住什么和不会记住什么。

相似文献

1
Context and semantic object properties interact to support recognition memory.上下文和语义对象属性相互作用以支持识别记忆。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Sep 28:17470218241283028. doi: 10.1177/17470218241283028.
2
The quantity, quality and findings of network meta-analyses evaluating the effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs for weight loss: a scoping review.评估胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)减肥效果的网状Meta分析的数量、质量及结果:一项范围综述
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jun 25:1-73. doi: 10.3310/SKHT8119.
3
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.自闭症社交媒体用户的污名管理策略
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
6
"Just Ask What Support We Need": Autistic Adults' Feedback on Social Skills Training.“只需询问我们需要什么支持”:成年自闭症患者对社交技能培训的反馈
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):283-292. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0136. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
8
Diagnostic test accuracy and cost-effectiveness of tests for codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q in people with glioma.染色体臂 1p 和 19q 缺失的检测在胶质瘤患者中的诊断准确性和成本效益。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 2;3(3):CD013387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013387.pub2.
9
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.择期引产的母婴结局
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009 Mar(176):1-257.
10
Scene complexity and the detail trace of human long-term visual memory.场景复杂性与人类长期视觉记忆的细节痕迹
Vision Res. 2025 Feb;227:108525. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2024.108525. Epub 2024 Dec 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Semantic Dimensions Support the Cortical Representation of Object Memorability.语义维度支持物体记忆性的皮层表征。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2025 Jun 12:1-27. doi: 10.1162/jocn.a.60.

本文引用的文献

1
Semantic object processing is modulated by prior scene context.语义对象处理受先前场景上下文的调节。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Sep 13;39(8):962-971. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2023.2279083. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
2
Representational formats of human memory traces.人类记忆痕迹的表象形式。
Brain Struct Funct. 2024 Apr;229(3):513-529. doi: 10.1007/s00429-023-02636-9. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
3
Typicality in the brain during semantic and episodic memory decisions.大脑在语义和情景记忆决策中的典型性。
Neuropsychologia. 2023 Jun 6;184:108529. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108529. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
4
Shape of U: The Nonmonotonic Relationship Between Object-Location Memory and Expectedness.U形:物体位置记忆与预期性之间的非单调关系。
Psychol Sci. 2022 Dec;33(12):2084-2097. doi: 10.1177/09567976221109134. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
5
Object memory is multisensory: Task-irrelevant sounds improve recollection.客体记忆具有多感觉通道特性:非任务相关的声音可提高回忆成绩。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Apr;30(2):652-665. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02182-1. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
6
Multiple dimensions of semantic and perceptual similarity contribute to mnemonic discrimination for pictures.语义和感知相似性的多个维度有助于对图片进行记忆辨别。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Dec;47(12):1903-1923. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001032. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
7
Conceptual knowledge modulates memory recognition of common items: The selective role of item-typicality.概念知识调节常见物品记忆识别:项目典型性的选择性作用。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Jan;50(1):77-94. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01213-x. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
8
The visual and semantic features that predict object memory: Concept property norms for 1,000 object images.预测物体记忆的视觉和语义特征:1000张物体图像的概念属性规范。
Mem Cognit. 2021 May;49(4):712-731. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01130-5. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
9
The meaning and structure of scenes.场景的意义和结构。
Vision Res. 2021 Apr;181:10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2020.11.003. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
10
Visual and Semantic Representations Predict Subsequent Memory in Perceptual and Conceptual Memory Tests.视觉和语义表示可预测知觉和概念记忆测试中的后续记忆。
Cereb Cortex. 2021 Jan 5;31(2):974-992. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa269.