Koenderink Jan, van Doorn Andrea, Wagemans Johan
KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Iperception. 2024 Sep 2;15(5):20416695241267371. doi: 10.1177/20416695241267371. eCollection 2024 Sep-Oct.
Pictorial awareness is addressed through experimental phenomenology involving over 90 naïve participants. Since one can't look at the "same" picture twice the study uses one-shot trials. The participant's fascination for the duration of a session is held through the artistic principle of theme and variation. Six variations focus on the theme of pictorial geometry, both two-dimensional and three-dimensional. Major findings are: Idiosyncratic deviations from veridical are huge as compared to common textbook "effects." Observers wield arbitrary heuristics for tasks that are "formally related." The assumption of a common formal framework is apparently unsound. The notion of "inverse optics" is misleading. A fair fraction of the population appears to lack monocular stereopsis as intuitive awareness. It suggests an as-yet unrecognized, but perhaps common variety of aphantasia.
通过涉及90多名未受过专业训练的参与者的实验现象学来研究图像感知。由于一个人无法两次观看“同一”幅图像,因此该研究采用一次性试验。通过主题与变奏的艺术原则,在整个实验过程中保持参与者的注意力。六个变奏聚焦于二维和三维图像几何主题。主要发现如下:与常见教科书“效应”相比,与真实情况的特殊偏差非常大。观察者对“形式相关”的任务运用任意启发式方法。共同形式框架的假设显然不合理。“逆光学”的概念具有误导性。相当一部分人似乎缺乏作为直观感知的单眼立体视觉。这表明存在一种尚未被认识到但可能很常见的phantasia变体。