• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性疼痛患者单阶段脊髓刺激的真实世界结果:一项多中心欧洲病例系列研究。

Real-world outcomes of single-stage spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain patients: A multicentre, European case series.

作者信息

De Negri Pasquale, Paz-Solis Jose Francisco, Rigoard Philippe, Raoul Sylvie, Kallewaard Jan-Willem, Gulve Ashish, Thomson Simon, Canós-Verdecho Maria Angeles, Love-Jones Sarah, Williams Adam, Rascón-Ramírez Fernando J, Bayerl Simon, Llopis-Calatayud José Emilio, Peña Vergara Isaac, Matis Georgios K, Vesper Jan, Abejón David, Maino Paolo, Papa Alfonso, Pei Yu, Jain Roshini

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Sant'Anna and San Sebastiano Hospital, Caserta, Italy.

Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Interv Pain Med. 2023 Jun 24;2(3):100263. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2023.100263. eCollection 2023 Sep.

DOI:
10.1016/j.inpm.2023.100263
PMID:39238903
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11372901/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is effective in treating chronic neuropathic pain. A screening trial is typically conducted prior to implantation to evaluate whether a patient is a good candidate for SCS. However, the need for a screening trial has been debated. We evaluated real-world clinical outcomes in patients who underwent a single-stage procedure to receive SCS therapy (i.e., no screening trial period) (SS-SCS).

METHODS

This observational, multicentre, real-world consecutive case series evaluated SS-SCS chronic pain patients. Pain and other functional outcomes were collected as part of standard care by site personnel with no sponsor involvement. Assessments included Numerical rating scale (NRS), Percent Pain Relief (PPR) and EQ-5D-5L (EuroQol 5 Dimensions-5L), recorded prior to SCS and following implantation.

RESULTS

A total of 171 chronic pain patients (mean age: 59.4; 53.2% females) underwent a single-stage procedure (mean last follow-up, 408 days) and were included in the analysis. A 5.0 ​± ​2.1-point improvement in overall pain was reported at 3 months and sustained until the last follow-up post-implantation (p ​< ​0.0001). At last follow-up, 50.3% (86/171) of patients reported an NRS pain score ≤3. Additionally, quality of life also improved (46.1-point change, from 70.2 to 25) at the last follow-up, based on EQ-5D-5L scores.

CONCLUSIONS

In routine clinical practice, SS-SCS can provide significant long-term pain relief and improve quality of life in chronic pain patients. Our results suggest that effective long-term outcomes and success may be achieved without a trial period prior to permanent implantation of an SCS system.

摘要

背景

脊髓刺激(SCS)在治疗慢性神经性疼痛方面有效。通常在植入前进行筛选试验,以评估患者是否是SCS的合适人选。然而,筛选试验的必要性一直存在争议。我们评估了接受单阶段手术接受SCS治疗(即无筛选试验期)(SS-SCS)的患者的真实世界临床结局。

方法

本观察性、多中心、真实世界连续病例系列评估了SS-SCS慢性疼痛患者。疼痛和其他功能结局由现场人员作为标准护理的一部分收集,无申办方参与。评估包括数字评分量表(NRS)、疼痛缓解百分比(PPR)和EQ-5D-5L(欧洲五维健康量表-5L),在SCS之前和植入后进行记录。

结果

共有171例慢性疼痛患者(平均年龄:59.4岁;53.2%为女性)接受了单阶段手术(平均末次随访,408天)并纳入分析。据报告,3个月时总体疼痛改善了5.0±2.1分,并持续至植入后的最后一次随访(p<0.0001)。在最后一次随访时,50.3%(86/171)的患者报告NRS疼痛评分≤3。此外,根据EQ-5D-5L评分,在最后一次随访时生活质量也有所改善(变化46.1分,从70.2降至25)。

结论

在常规临床实践中,SS-SCS可以为慢性疼痛患者提供显著的长期疼痛缓解并改善生活质量。我们的结果表明,在永久植入SCS系统之前无需试验期即可实现有效的长期结局和成功。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c849/11372901/d58e1f54b27b/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c849/11372901/5fc8c9861cda/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c849/11372901/94f465892799/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c849/11372901/6996e850ec7b/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c849/11372901/5b7815c504cc/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c849/11372901/d58e1f54b27b/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c849/11372901/5fc8c9861cda/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c849/11372901/94f465892799/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c849/11372901/6996e850ec7b/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c849/11372901/5b7815c504cc/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c849/11372901/d58e1f54b27b/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
Real-world outcomes of single-stage spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain patients: A multicentre, European case series.慢性疼痛患者单阶段脊髓刺激的真实世界结果:一项多中心欧洲病例系列研究。
Interv Pain Med. 2023 Jun 24;2(3):100263. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2023.100263. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Options: A Prospective, Open-Label Study of High-Dose Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Chronic Back and Leg Pain.一项前瞻性、开放性标签研究,观察高剂量脊髓刺激治疗慢性腰背及下肢疼痛患者的效果。
Pain Physician. 2020 Jan;23(1):87-98.
3
Clinical utilization of fast-acting sub-perception therapy (FAST) in SCS-implanted patients for treatment of mixed pain.速效阈下感知疗法(FAST)在接受脊髓刺激器(SCS)植入的患者中用于治疗混合性疼痛的临床应用。
Interv Pain Med. 2022 Dec 1;1(4):100165. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100165. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome leads to improvement of quality of life, reduction of pain and psychological distress: a retrospective case series with 24 months follow up.脊髓刺激治疗复杂性区域疼痛综合征可改善生活质量,减轻疼痛和心理困扰:一项 24 个月随访的回顾性病例系列研究。
Scand J Pain. 2020 Apr 28;20(2):253-259. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2019-0081.
5
Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation as a Salvage Therapy Following Failed Spinal Cord Stimulation.脊髓刺激失败后,背根神经节刺激作为一种挽救疗法。
Neuromodulation. 2022 Oct;25(7):1024-1032. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.04.050. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
6
Real-World Outcomes Using a Spinal Cord Stimulation Device Capable of Combination Therapy for Chronic Pain: A European, Multicenter Experience.使用能够进行联合治疗的脊髓刺激装置治疗慢性疼痛的真实世界疗效:一项欧洲多中心经验。
J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 10;10(18):4085. doi: 10.3390/jcm10184085.
7
Does a Screening Trial for Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Chronic Pain of Neuropathic Origin have Clinical Utility and Cost-Effectiveness? (TRIAL-STIM Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.神经病理性起源慢性疼痛患者脊髓刺激筛查试验是否具有临床实用性和成本效益?(TRIAL-STIM研究):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Nov 16;19(1):633. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2993-9.
8
Implanted spinal neuromodulation interventions for chronic pain in adults.成人慢性疼痛的脊髓植入式神经调节干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 2;12(12):CD013756. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013756.pub2.
9
Improvement in Health-Related Quality of Life With Spinal Cord Stimulation in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study.脊髓刺激治疗复杂性区域疼痛综合征的健康相关生活质量改善:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Neuromodulation. 2024 Aug;27(6):1035-1044. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2024.04.008. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
10
Benefit of spinal cord stimulation for patients with central poststroke pain: a retrospective multicenter study.脊髓刺激治疗脑卒中后中枢性疼痛患者的获益:一项回顾性多中心研究。
J Neurosurg. 2021 Jul 2;136(2):601-612. doi: 10.3171/2020.11.JNS202999. Print 2022 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Spinal Cord Stimulation for Spinal Cord Injury-Related Pain: A Pilot Study.脊髓刺激治疗脊髓损伤相关疼痛:一项初步研究。
Brain Sci. 2024 Nov 22;14(12):1173. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14121173.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for chronic primary neuropathic pain in the contemporary era: a systematic review and meta-analysis.脊髓刺激治疗慢性原发性神经病理性疼痛的长期疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neurosurg Sci. 2024 Feb;68(1):128-139. doi: 10.23736/S0390-5616.23.05930-1. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
2
Combination therapy with simultaneous delivery of spinal cord stimulation modalities: COMBO randomized controlled trial.同时递送脊髓刺激方式的联合治疗:COMBO随机对照试验。
Pain Manag. 2023 Mar;13(3):171-184. doi: 10.2217/pmt-2022-0101. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
3
Does a Screening Trial for Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Chronic Pain of Neuropathic Origin Have Clinical Utility (TRIAL-STIM)? 36-Month Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial.
脊髓刺激筛查试验在神经病理性慢性疼痛患者中的临床应用价值如何(TRIAL-STIM)?一项随机对照试验的 36 个月结果。
Neurosurgery. 2023 Jan 1;92(1):75-82. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002165. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
4
Surround Inhibition Mediates Pain Relief by Low Amplitude Spinal Cord Stimulation: Modeling and Measurement.周围抑制介导低频脊髓刺激的镇痛作用:建模与测量。
eNeuro. 2022 Oct 5;9(5). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0058-22.2022. Print 2022 Sep-Oct.
5
Screening trials of spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain in England-A budget impact analysis.英格兰脊髓刺激治疗神经性疼痛的筛查试验——预算影响分析
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 6;3:974904. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2022.974904. eCollection 2022.
6
Patient selection for spinal cord stimulation: The importance of an integrated assessment of clinical and psychosocial factors.脊髓刺激的患者选择:临床和社会心理因素综合评估的重要性。
Eur J Pain. 2022 Oct;26(9):1873-1881. doi: 10.1002/ejp.2009. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
7
Patient Selection for Spinal Cord Stimulation in Treatment of Pain: Sequential Decision-Making Model - A Narrative Review.脊髓刺激治疗疼痛的患者选择:序贯决策模型——一篇叙述性综述
J Pain Res. 2022 Apr 20;15:1163-1171. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S250455. eCollection 2022.
8
Applicability and Validity of an e-Health Tool for the Appropriate Referral and Selection of Patients With Chronic Pain for Spinal Cord Stimulation: Results From a European Retrospective Study.一种用于慢性疼痛患者脊髓刺激适当转诊和选择的电子健康工具的适用性和有效性:一项欧洲回顾性研究的结果
Neuromodulation. 2023 Jan;26(1):164-171. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2021.12.006. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
9
Exploration of High- and Low-Frequency Options for Subperception Spinal Cord Stimulation Using Neural Dosing Parameter Relationships: The HALO Study.利用神经剂量参数关系探索亚感知脊髓刺激的高低频选项:HALO 研究。
Neuromodulation. 2022 Jan;25(1):94-102. doi: 10.1111/ner.13390.
10
Machine Learning Algorithms Provide Greater Prediction of Response to SCS Than Lead Screening Trial: A Predictive AI-Based Multicenter Study.机器学习算法在预测脊髓刺激反应方面比导联筛选试验更具优势:一项基于预测性人工智能的多中心研究。
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 18;10(20):4764. doi: 10.3390/jcm10204764.