• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声检查在膝关节骨关节炎中的诊断价值:一项系统评价。

Diagnostic value of ultrasonography in knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review.

作者信息

Eftekharsadat Bina, Khakbiz Saideh, Badali Ahmadreza, Nasiri Ehsan, Babaei-Ghazani Arash

机构信息

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Student Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

出版信息

J Res Med Sci. 2024 Jul 12;29:39. doi: 10.4103/jrms.jrms_489_23. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.4103/jrms.jrms_489_23
PMID:39239080
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11376718/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is the most expected diagnosis for an arthropathy that causes discomfort and disability in older adults. Radiography is frequently used to assess patients with KOA and there have been few prior research evaluating the diagnostic efficacy of ultrasonography (US). The current study sought to assess the diagnostic efficacy of the US in identifying various characteristics of KOA in the scientific literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses statement. A systematic search in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase databases was completed in March 2023. This study focused on the diagnostic value of US in KOA, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. The quality assessment was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools.

RESULTS

Out of 552 records of database searches, finally, two studies met this systematic review's eligibility criteria and were included in the study. Both of the included studies were cross sectional studies. US demonstrated remarkable sensitivity with adequate specificity for the detection of radiographic knee OA; however, it was found not to be an appropriate method for the detection of early KOA.

CONCLUSION

This study as the first systematic review aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of US in detecting KOA. These findings shed light on the importance of investigating the different US features in the evaluation of KOA to reach appropriate sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis.

摘要

背景

膝关节骨关节炎(KOA)是导致老年人不适和残疾的关节病最常见的诊断。X线摄影常用于评估KOA患者,此前很少有研究评估超声检查(US)的诊断效能。本研究旨在评估科学文献中US在识别KOA各种特征方面的诊断效能。

材料与方法

本研究按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目声明进行。2023年3月在PubMed、科学网、Scopus和Embase数据库中完成了系统检索。本研究关注US在KOA中的诊断价值,包括敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的批判性评价工具进行质量评估。

结果

在数据库检索的552条记录中,最终有两项研究符合本系统评价的纳入标准并被纳入研究。纳入的两项研究均为横断面研究。US在检测膝关节X线骨关节炎方面具有显著的敏感性和足够的特异性;然而,发现它不是检测早期KOA的合适方法。

结论

本研究作为首次系统评价旨在评估US在检测KOA方面的诊断性能。这些发现揭示了在评估KOA时研究不同US特征以在诊断中达到适当敏感性和特异性的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3185/11376718/e91001d69a05/JRMS-29-39-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3185/11376718/e91001d69a05/JRMS-29-39-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3185/11376718/e91001d69a05/JRMS-29-39-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Diagnostic value of ultrasonography in knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review.超声检查在膝关节骨关节炎中的诊断价值:一项系统评价。
J Res Med Sci. 2024 Jul 12;29:39. doi: 10.4103/jrms.jrms_489_23. eCollection 2024.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Prognostic models for knee osteoarthritis: a protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal, and meta-analysis.膝关节骨关节炎的预后模型:一项系统评价、批判性评估和荟萃分析的方案
Syst Rev. 2021 May 19;10(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01683-9.
4
Functional manifestations of early knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.早期膝关节骨关节炎的功能表现:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Sep;41(9):2625-2634. doi: 10.1007/s10067-022-06150-x. Epub 2022 May 12.
5
Effectiveness and safety of manual therapy for knee osteoarthritis: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.手法治疗膝骨关节炎的有效性和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析概述。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 24;11:1081238. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1081238. eCollection 2023.
6
An Overview of Systematic Reviews of Moxibustion for Knee Osteoarthritis.艾灸治疗膝骨关节炎的系统评价综述
Front Physiol. 2022 Feb 3;13:822953. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.822953. eCollection 2022.
7
Trabecular bone texture analysis of conventional radiographs in the assessment of knee osteoarthritis: review and viewpoint.常规 X 线片评估膝关节骨关节炎的小梁骨纹理分析:综述与观点。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2021 Aug 6;23(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s13075-021-02594-9.
8
Efficacy and Safety of Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Treatment for Chronic Pain in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.超声引导下射频治疗膝骨关节炎慢性疼痛的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pain Res Manag. 2020 Sep 19;2020:2537075. doi: 10.1155/2020/2537075. eCollection 2020.
9
A systematic review, umbrella review, and quality assessment on clinical translation of stem cell therapy for knee osteoarthritis: Are we there yet?系统评价、伞式评价和对干细胞治疗膝骨关节炎的临床转化的质量评估:我们做到了吗?
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2023 Apr 15;14(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13287-023-03332-5.
10
Effectiveness of Traditional Chinese Exercise for Symptoms of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.传统中医运动治疗膝骨关节炎症状的疗效:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 27;17(21):7873. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217873.

本文引用的文献

1
Burden of knee osteoarthritis in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA): an epidemiological analysis from 1990 to 2019.中东和北非地区膝关节骨关节炎负担:1990年至2019年的流行病学分析
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Oct;143(10):6323-6333. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04852-8. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
2
The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for randomized controlled trials.JBI 偏倚风险评估工具修订版用于评估随机对照试验的偏倚风险。
JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Mar 1;21(3):494-506. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00430.
3
Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing knee cartilage changes over time in patients with osteoarthritis: A systematic review.
磁共振成像评估骨关节炎患者膝关节软骨随时间变化的准确性:一项系统评价。
North Clin Istanb. 2022 Sep 5;9(4):414-418. doi: 10.14744/nci.2021.34270. eCollection 2022.
4
Ultrasonographic Changes of the Knee Joint Reflect Symptoms of Early Knee Osteoarthritis in General Population; The Nagahama Study.膝关节超声变化反映了普通人群膝关节早期骨关节炎的症状;长滨研究。
Cartilage. 2022 Jan-Mar;13(1):19476035221077403. doi: 10.1177/19476035221077403.
5
Disease burden of osteoarthritis of the knee and hip due to a high body mass index in China and the USA: 1990-2019 findings from the global burden of disease study 2019.中国和美国因高身体质量指数导致的膝和髋关节骨关节炎疾病负担:2019 年全球疾病负担研究的 1990-2019 年调查结果。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jan 17;23(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05027-z.
6
Global, regional prevalence, incidence and risk factors of knee osteoarthritis in population-based studies.基于人群研究的全球、地区膝关节骨关节炎的患病率、发病率及危险因素
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Nov 26;29-30:100587. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100587. eCollection 2020 Dec.
7
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
8
Performance of Ultrasonography Compared to Conventional Radiography for the Diagnosis of Osteoarthritis in Patients With Knee Pain.超声检查与传统X线摄影在诊断膝关节疼痛患者骨关节炎中的性能比较。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Jul 3;7:319. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00319. eCollection 2020.
9
Comparing the Accuracy of Radiography and Sonography in Detection of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Diagnostic Study.比较X线摄影与超声检查在膝关节骨关节炎检测中的准确性:一项诊断性研究。
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 Dec 5;7(23):4015-4018. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.617. eCollection 2019 Dec 15.
10
Osteoarthritis in the Middle-Aged and Elderly in China: Prevalence and Influencing Factors.中国中老年人群骨关节炎:患病率及影响因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 26;16(23):4701. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234701.