Suppr超能文献

患者安全实情调查员:腰椎射频神经切断术及后路内固定患者的射频神经切断术中的运动刺激测试

FactFinders for patient safety: Motor stimulation testing in lumbar radiofrequency neurotomy and radiofrequency neurotomy in patients with posterior hardware.

作者信息

Saffarian Mathew, Christolias George, Babaria Vivek, Patel Jaymin, Nguyen Minh C, Smith Clark C, Miller David C, McCormick Zachary L

机构信息

Michigan State University, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, East Lansing, MI, USA.

Columbia University Medical Center, Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Interv Pain Med. 2023 Mar 28;2(1):100170. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100170. eCollection 2023 Mar.

Abstract

This series of FactFinders presents a brief summary of the evidence and outlines recommendations regarding the use of motor stimulation testing in lumbar radiofrequency neurotomy and performance of radiofrequency neurotomy in patients with posterior spinal hardware. The evidence in support of the following facts is presented: (1) Motor stimulation does not inherently protect against unwanted damage to the spinal nerve, exiting spinal nerve root or its ventral ramus due to a lack of sensitivity of this test for identification of electrode contact or close proximity to sensorimotor nerves. Even when motor stimulation is performed, verification of correct electrode placement with multiplanar imaging including a minimum of true anterior-posterior and lateral fluoroscopic views is a recommended safeguard. (2) The existence of posterior spinal hardware is not an absolute contraindication to radiofrequency neurotomy, but direct contact with hardware should be avoided.

摘要

本系列《事实发现者》简要总结了相关证据,并概述了关于在腰椎射频神经切断术中使用运动刺激测试以及在有脊柱后路内固定装置的患者中进行射频神经切断术的建议。支持以下事实的证据如下:(1)由于该测试对识别电极与感觉运动神经的接触或紧邻缺乏敏感性,运动刺激本身并不能防止对脊神经、出椎间孔的脊神经根或其腹侧支造成意外损伤。即使进行了运动刺激,建议通过包括至少真正的前后位和侧位透视视图的多平面成像来验证电极放置是否正确,作为一种保障措施。(2)脊柱后路内固定装置的存在并非射频神经切断术的绝对禁忌证,但应避免与内固定装置直接接触。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验