Park Chang Kyu, Kim Sung Bum, Kim Min Ki, Park Bong Jin, Choi Seok Geun, Lim Young Jin, Kim Tae Sung
Department of Neurosurgery, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Korean J Spine. 2014 Sep;11(3):97-102. doi: 10.14245/kjs.2014.11.3.97. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
The incidence of spinal treatment, including nerve block, radiofrequency neurotomy, instrumented fusions, is increasing, and progressively involves patients of age 65 and older. Treatment of the geriatric patients is often a difficult challenge for the spine surgeon. General health, sociofamilial and mental condition of the patients as well as the treatment techniques and postoperative management are to be accurately evaluated and planned. We tried to compare three treatment methods of spinal stenosis for geriatric patient in single institution.
The cases of treatment methods in spinal stenosis over than 65 years old were analyzed. The numbers of patients were 371 underwent nerve block, radiofrequency neurotomy, instrumented fusions from January 2009 to December 2012 (nerve block: 253, radiofrequency neurotomy: 56, instrumented fusions: 62). The authors reviewed medical records, operative findings and postoperative clinical results, retrospectively. Simple X-ray were evaluated and clinical outcome was measured by Odom's criteria at 1 month after procedures.
We were observed excellent and good results in 162 (64%) patients with nerve block, 40 (71%) patient with radIofrequency neurotomy, 46 (74%) patient with spinal surgery. Poor results were 20 (8%) patients in nerve block, 2 (3%) patients in radiofrequency neurotomy, 3 (5%) patient in spinal surgery.
We reviewed literatures and analyzed three treatment methods of spinal stenosis for geriatric patients. Although the long term outcome of surgical treatment was most favorable, radiofrequency neurotomy and nerve block can be considered for the secondary management of elderly lumbar spinals stenosis patients.
包括神经阻滞、射频神经切断术、器械融合术在内的脊柱治疗发病率正在上升,且逐渐涉及65岁及以上的患者。老年患者的治疗对脊柱外科医生来说往往是一项艰巨的挑战。需要准确评估和规划患者的一般健康状况、社会家庭和精神状况以及治疗技术和术后管理。我们试图在单一机构中比较老年患者脊柱狭窄的三种治疗方法。
分析65岁以上脊柱狭窄治疗方法的病例。2009年1月至2012年12月期间,有371例患者接受了神经阻滞、射频神经切断术、器械融合术(神经阻滞:253例,射频神经切断术:56例,器械融合术:62例)。作者回顾性地查阅了病历、手术结果和术后临床结果。评估了简单X线片,并在术后1个月根据奥多姆标准测量临床结果。
我们观察到神经阻滞患者中有162例(64%)效果极佳和良好,射频神经切断术患者中有40例(71%),脊柱手术患者中有46例(74%)。神经阻滞患者中有20例(8%)效果不佳,射频神经切断术患者中有2例(3%),脊柱手术患者中有3例(5%)。
我们查阅了文献并分析了老年患者脊柱狭窄的三种治疗方法。尽管手术治疗的长期效果最理想,但对于老年腰椎管狭窄症患者的二次治疗,可以考虑射频神经切断术和神经阻滞。