Suppr超能文献

传统医疗保险和医疗保险优势计划受益人群中远程医疗的可及性与使用情况。

Telehealth availability and use among beneficiaries in Traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage.

作者信息

Park Sungchul, Jung Hye-Young, Yu Jiani

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, College of Health Science, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

BK21 FOUR R&E Center for Learning Health Systems, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Feb;73(2):545-551. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19183. Epub 2024 Sep 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medicare Advantage (MA) plans must cover all telehealth services offered by Traditional Medicare (TM), but have flexibility to provide additional telehealth services. It is not known whether these flexibilities are associated with telehealth availability and use. In this study, we examined differences in telehealth availability and use between TM and MA beneficiaries.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study analyzed beneficiaries who participated in the 2021 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey. Our primary outcomes were telehealth availability and use, assessed both overall and by modality (telephone only, video only, and both). Our key independent variable was full-year enrollment in MA versus TM. Differences in outcomes between TM and MA beneficiaries were estimated using logistic regression models that adjusted for beneficiary characteristics. The analysis of telehealth availability included all beneficiaries in the sample, while the analysis of telehealth use was limited to those offered telehealth services. In a secondary analysis, we examined differences between TM and MA beneficiaries in the availability of technology that may enable telehealth use and experience using the internet to seek information.

RESULTS

Among 8130 Medicare beneficiaries, MA beneficiaries were 2.9 (95% CI: 0.6-5.2) percentage points more likely to have a provider who offered telehealth services than TM beneficiaries, including both telephone and video options. However, MA beneficiaries were 3.5 (-6.7, -0.4) percentage points less likely to use telehealth services than TM beneficiaries. Video-only options were used less frequently among MA beneficiaries compared to those in TM (-2.7 [-5.1, -0.3]). Despite lower telehealth use, MA beneficiaries had comparable or higher rates of technology access and internet experience compared to TM beneficiaries.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that greater access to telehealth services among MA beneficiaries did not translate into greater telehealth use. Future research is warranted to explore the underlying mechanisms behind lower use of telehealth services among MA beneficiaries.

摘要

背景

医疗保险优势(MA)计划必须涵盖传统医疗保险(TM)提供的所有远程医疗服务,但在提供额外远程医疗服务方面具有灵活性。尚不清楚这些灵活性是否与远程医疗的可及性和使用相关。在本研究中,我们考察了TM和MA受益人群在远程医疗可及性和使用方面的差异。

方法

这项横断面研究分析了参与2021年医疗保险当前受益人群调查的受益人群。我们的主要结局是远程医疗的可及性和使用情况,整体评估以及按方式(仅电话、仅视频以及两者兼有)评估。我们的关键自变量是全年参加MA与TM的情况。使用调整了受益人群特征的逻辑回归模型估计TM和MA受益人群在结局方面的差异。远程医疗可及性分析纳入样本中的所有受益人群,而远程医疗使用情况分析仅限于那些获得远程医疗服务提供的人群。在一项次要分析中,我们考察了TM和MA受益人群在可能促成远程医疗使用的技术可及性以及使用互联网获取信息的体验方面存在哪些差异。

结果

在8130名医疗保险受益人群中,MA受益人群比TM受益人群拥有提供远程医疗服务(包括电话和视频选项)的医疗服务提供者的可能性高2.9(95%置信区间:0.6 - 5.2)个百分点。然而,MA受益人群使用远程医疗服务的可能性比TM受益人群低3.5(-6.7,-0.4)个百分点。与TM受益人群相比,MA受益人群较少使用仅视频选项(-2.7 [-5.1,-0.3])。尽管远程医疗使用较少,但MA受益人群在技术获取和互联网体验方面的比例与TM受益人群相当或更高。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,MA受益人群获得更多远程医疗服务的机会并未转化为更多的远程医疗使用。有必要开展进一步研究,以探究MA受益人群远程医疗服务使用较少背后的潜在机制。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验