Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241277408. doi: 10.1177/21501319241277408.
Financial strain has important consequences for patients, providers, and health care systems. However, there is currently no gold standard measure to screen for financial strain. This study compared the performance of 3 single-item screeners using a composite measure of financial strain as a "gold standard."
We conducted a secondary analysis of unweighted data from a 2021 survey of Kaiser Permanente Northern California health plan members comparing the percentages of adults who experienced financial strain based on 3 general single-item screeners, a screener specific to medical and dental health care use, and a composite financial strain measure. The study sample was comprised of 2734 non-Medicaid insured adults who answered all financial strain questions. Kappa statistics evaluating agreement of the 3 general screeners with the composite measure were calculated for the sample overall, by age group, and within age group, by 4 levels of income and 4 racial/ethnic subgroups.
Among 947 adults aged 35 to 65, 30.7% had just enough money or not enough money to make ends meet, 23.3% had a somewhat hard or hard time paying for basics, 18.8% had trouble paying for ≥1 type of expense, 20.5% had delayed/used less medical/dental care, and 41.5% had experienced financial strain based on the composite measure. Among 1787 adults aged 66 to 85, the percentages who screened positive on these measures were 22.7%, 19.4%, 12.9%, 19.8%, and 34.4%, respectively. Across the sample, by income categories and racial/ethnic groups, the making ends meet screener identified higher percentages of adults experiencing financial strain and performed better when compared with the composite measure than the hard to pay for the very basics and trouble paying for expenses screeners. Overall, substantial decreases in the percentages of adults who screened positive on the financial strain measures were seen as level of income increased. Within income categories, middle-aged adults were more likely than older adults to have experienced financial strain based on the composite and general single-item screeners.
As social risk screening becomes part of the standard of care, it will be important to assess how well different brief screeners for financial strain perform with diverse patient populations.
经济负担会对患者、医护人员和医疗保健系统造成重要影响。然而,目前并没有筛查经济负担的黄金标准方法。本研究使用综合经济负担指标对 3 种单项筛查工具进行了比较,以评估其作为“黄金标准”的表现。
我们对 2021 年 Kaiser Permanente 北加州健康计划成员的一项调查未加权数据进行了二次分析,比较了基于 3 种一般单项筛查工具、一种针对医疗和牙科保健使用的筛查工具以及综合经济负担指标的成年人经历经济负担的比例。研究样本由 2734 名未参加医疗补助计划的成年受访者组成,他们回答了所有经济负担问题。针对总体样本、年龄组以及按收入 4 个等级和种族/族裔 4 个亚组进行了评估,计算了 3 种一般筛查工具与综合指标的kappa 统计一致性。
在 947 名 35 至 65 岁的成年人中,30.7%的人表示收入刚好够或不够维持生计,23.3%的人表示支付基本生活费用有些困难或困难,18.8%的人表示难以支付≥1 种费用,20.5%的人延迟/减少了医疗/牙科保健的使用,41.5%的人根据综合指标经历了经济负担。在 1787 名 66 至 85 岁的成年人中,这些指标的阳性筛查率分别为 22.7%、19.4%、12.9%、19.8%和 34.4%。在整个样本中,按收入类别和种族/族裔群体划分,收支平衡筛查器识别出经历经济负担的成年人比例更高,与综合指标相比,其在支付基本生活费用有困难和支付费用有困难的筛查器表现更好。总体而言,随着收入水平的提高,筛查呈阳性的成年人比例显著下降。在收入类别内,中年成年人比老年成年人更有可能根据综合和单项筛查工具经历经济负担。
随着社会风险筛查成为护理标准的一部分,评估不同的经济负担简要筛查工具在不同患者群体中的表现将非常重要。