Martinez D, Callahan L T
Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Apr;4(2):186-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02013595.
Mice rendered leukopenic with cyclophosphamide and then challenged with viable Pseudomonas aeruginosa were used to determine the protective efficacy of active immunization against exotoxin A and of passive immunization with human antiserum to Escherichia coli J5, a rough mutant of Escherichia coli O111:B4. Neither treatment alone provided a greater degree of protection than its respective control. However, the combination of these treatments produced a moderate, yet consistent, increase in the survival of infected immunosuppressed mice.
用环磷酰胺使小鼠白细胞减少,然后用活的铜绿假单胞菌攻击,以此来确定针对外毒素A的主动免疫以及用人抗大肠杆菌J5(大肠杆菌O111:B4的粗糙突变株)血清进行被动免疫的保护效果。单独的任何一种治疗方法都没有比各自的对照组提供更大程度的保护。然而,这些治疗方法的组合使受感染的免疫抑制小鼠的存活率有适度但持续的提高。