• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经典的电子德尔菲调查,旨在就促进威尔士医疗服务中非医疗处方的实施和持续发展的因素达成全国共识并确定优先事项。

Classic e-Delphi survey to provide national consensus and establish priorities with regards to the factors that promote the implementation and continued development of non-medical prescribing within health services in Wales.

作者信息

Courtenay Molly, Deslandes Rhian, Harries-Huntley Gail, Hodson Karen, Morris Gary

机构信息

School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

Cardiff School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 19;8(9):e024161. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024161.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024161
PMID:30232116
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6150146/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To provide national consensus and establish priorities with regards to the factors that promote the implementation and continued development of non-medical prescribing within health services.

DESIGN

Classic e-Delphi survey.

SETTING

National study in Wales.

PARTICIPANTS

Pharmacists, nurses and allied health professionals with the independent/supplementary prescribing qualification.

RESULTS

A total of 55 non-medical prescribers agreed to become members of the expert panel of whom 42 (76%) completed the round 1 questionnaire, 40/42 (95%) completed round 2 and 34/40 (85%) responded to round 3. Twenty-one statements were developed, and consensus was achieved on nine factors representing those necessary for the successful implementation of non-medical prescribing and five representing actions required for its continued development. Strategic fit between non-medical prescribing and existing service provision, organisation preparedness, visible benefits, good managerial and team support, and a clear differentiation of roles were each important influences.

CONCLUSION

Given the high degree of consensus, this list of factors and actions should provide guidance to managers and commissioners of services wishing to initiate or extend non-medical prescribing. This information should be considered internationally by other countries outside of the UK wishing to implement prescribing by non-medical healthcare professionals.

摘要

目的

就促进卫生服务中非医疗处方实施及持续发展的因素达成全国共识并确定优先事项。

设计

经典电子德尔菲法调查。

地点

威尔士的全国性研究。

参与者

具有独立/补充处方资格的药剂师、护士和专职医疗人员。

结果

共有55名非医疗处方者同意成为专家小组的成员,其中42人(76%)完成了第一轮问卷,40/42人(95%)完成了第二轮,34/40人(85%)回复了第三轮。制定了21条陈述,就代表非医疗处方成功实施所需的9个因素和代表其持续发展所需行动的5个因素达成了共识。非医疗处方与现有服务提供之间的战略契合度、组织准备情况、明显的益处、良好的管理和团队支持以及角色的明确区分都是重要影响因素。

结论

鉴于高度的共识,这份因素和行动清单应为希望启动或扩大非医疗处方的服务管理者和委托方提供指导。希望实施非医疗保健专业人员处方的英国以外其他国家应在国际范围内考虑这些信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06f3/6150146/92d8ec93b76f/bmjopen-2018-024161f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06f3/6150146/92d8ec93b76f/bmjopen-2018-024161f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06f3/6150146/92d8ec93b76f/bmjopen-2018-024161f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Classic e-Delphi survey to provide national consensus and establish priorities with regards to the factors that promote the implementation and continued development of non-medical prescribing within health services in Wales.经典的电子德尔菲调查,旨在就促进威尔士医疗服务中非医疗处方的实施和持续发展的因素达成全国共识并确定优先事项。
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 19;8(9):e024161. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024161.
2
Overview of the uptake and implementation of non-medical prescribing in Wales: a national survey.威尔士非医疗处方实施情况概述:全国性调查。
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 24;7(9):e015313. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015313.
3
A Delphi study to explore and gain consensus regarding the most important barriers and facilitators affecting physiotherapist and pharmacist non-medical prescribing.一项德尔菲研究,旨在探索并达成共识,了解影响物理治疗师和药剂师非医疗处方的最重要障碍和促进因素。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 2;16(2):e0246273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246273. eCollection 2021.
4
An overiew of non medical prescribing across one strategic health authority: a questionnaire survey.一个战略卫生局内非医疗处方的概述:问卷调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jun 1;12:138. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-138.
5
Independent extended and supplementary nurse prescribing practice in the UK: a national questionnaire survey.英国独立的扩展和补充护士处方实践:一项全国性问卷调查
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Sep;44(7):1093-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.04.005. Epub 2006 Jun 5.
6
Development of consensus guidance to facilitate service redesign around pharmacist prescribing in UK hospital practice.制定共识指南,以促进英国医院实践中围绕药剂师处方进行服务重新设计。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2014 Oct;36(5):1069-76. doi: 10.1007/s11096-014-9996-8. Epub 2014 Aug 10.
7
Supplementary nurse prescribing for patients with skin conditions: a national questionnaire survey.为皮肤病患者提供补充护理处方:一项全国性问卷调查
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jul;16(7):1230-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01641.x.
8
A modified-Delphi study of a framework to support the potential implementation of pharmacist prescribing.支持药剂师处方潜在实施的框架的改良德尔菲研究。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Jun;16(6):812-818. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
9
The redistribution of medicines: could it become a reality?药品的重新分配:它会成为现实吗?
Int J Pharm Pract. 2016 Dec;24(6):411-418. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12275. Epub 2016 May 30.
10
Non-medical prescribing versus medical prescribing for acute and chronic disease management in primary and secondary care.基层医疗和二级医疗中急性和慢性疾病管理的非医学处方与医学处方对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 22;11(11):CD011227. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011227.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Reaching experts for enhanced referral (REFER) to pain psychology: a modified Delphi approach with multidisciplinary paediatric pain providers at a specialised center in the USA.联系专家以加强向疼痛心理学的转诊(REFER):美国一家专业中心采用改良德尔菲法与多学科儿科疼痛治疗人员合作。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2024 Dec 24;8(1):e003020. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003020.
2
Comparing independent prescribing to patient group direction use in a general practitioner out-of-hours service: a retrospective cross-sectional service evaluation.在全科医生非工作时间服务中比较独立处方与患者群体指导用药:一项回顾性横断面服务评估。
Br Paramed J. 2024 Sep 1;9(2):21-28. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2024.9.9.2.21.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Beginners in prescribing practice: Experiences and perceptions of nurses and doctors.初级处方实践:护士和医生的经验与看法。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Mar;27(5-6):1103-1112. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14136. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
2
Overview of the uptake and implementation of non-medical prescribing in Wales: a national survey.威尔士非医疗处方实施情况概述:全国性调查。
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 24;7(9):e015313. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015313.
3
Non-medical prescribing versus medical prescribing for acute and chronic disease management in primary and secondary care.
Consensus building on definitions and types of child maltreatment to improve recording and surveillance in Europe: protocol for a multi-sectoral, European, electronic Delphi study.
关于儿童虐待的定义和类型的共识建立,以改善欧洲的记录和监测:一项多部门、欧洲、电子德尔菲研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 12;13(12):e076517. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076517.
4
Validating a framework to guide the implementation of high-quality virtual primary care: an international eDelphi study protocol.验证指导高质量虚拟初级保健实施的框架:一项国际电子德尔菲研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 1;13(12):e080565. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080565.
5
Eliciting and prioritising determinants of improved care in multimorbidity: A modified online Delphi study.确定多重疾病中改善护理的决定因素并确定其优先级:一项改进的在线德尔菲研究。
J Multimorb Comorb. 2023 Sep 5;13:26335565231194552. doi: 10.1177/26335565231194552. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
6
WAO consensus on DEfinition of Food Allergy SEverity (DEFASE).世界变态反应组织食物过敏严重程度定义(DEFASE)共识
World Allergy Organ J. 2023 Mar 2;16(3):100753. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100753. eCollection 2023 Mar.
7
Developing tailored intervention strategies for implementation of stratified care to low back pain with physiotherapists in Nigeria: a Delphi study.为尼日利亚的物理治疗师制定分层护理实施的定制干预策略:一项德尔菲研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 9;23(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09123-1.
8
Artificial intelligence in medical education curriculum: An e-Delphi study for competencies.人工智能在医学教育课程中的应用:一项关于能力的电子德尔菲研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 21;17(7):e0271872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271872. eCollection 2022.
9
Delphi study to identify consensus on patient selection for hydrogel rectal spacer use during radiation therapy for prostate cancer in the UK.在英国,针对前列腺癌放射治疗中使用水凝胶直肠间隔器的患者选择,开展了德尔菲研究以确定共识。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 20;12(7):e060506. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060506.
10
Experiences and opinions of multi-professional non-medical oncology prescribers on post-qualification training: a qualitative study.多专业非肿瘤医学处方者对资格后培训的经验和意见:一项定性研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2022 Jun;44(3):698-708. doi: 10.1007/s11096-022-01396-6. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
基层医疗和二级医疗中急性和慢性疾病管理的非医学处方与医学处方对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 22;11(11):CD011227. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011227.pub2.
4
National survey of nurse prescribing in mental health services; a follow-up 6 years on.心理健康服务中护士处方的全国性调查;6年后的随访
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2016 Aug;23(6-7):378-86. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12329. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
5
Pharmacist independent prescribing in secondary care: opportunities and challenges.二级医疗保健中药剂师的独立处方权:机遇与挑战。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Feb;38(1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0226-9.
6
The impact of nurse prescribing on the clinical setting.护士处方权对临床环境的影响。
Br J Nurs. 2015;24(17):878-85. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2015.24.17.878.
7
The effects of nurse prescribing: a systematic review.护士处方的效果:一项系统综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Jul;51(7):1048-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.003. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
8
Factors influencing pharmacists' adoption of prescribing: qualitative application of the diffusion of innovations theory.影响药师处方行为的因素:创新扩散理论的定性应用。
Implement Sci. 2013 Sep 14;8:109. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-109.
9
How do nurse prescribers integrate prescribing in practice: case studies in primary and secondary care.护士从业者如何将处方融入实践:初级和二级保健中的案例研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2013 Jul;22(13-14):2077-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04338.x. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
10
Exploring nurses' experiences of prescribing in secondary care: informing future education and practice.探索护士在二级医疗保健中开处方的经历:为未来的教育和实践提供信息。
J Clin Nurs. 2012 Jul;21(13-14):2044-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.04050.x.