Suppr超能文献

氯胺酮单独与氯胺酮联合咪达唑仑在小儿骨折复位中镇静的安全性和深度:回顾性图表分析。

Safety and Depth of Sedation With Ketamine Alone Versus Ketamine With Midazolam in Pediatric Fracture Reduction: A Retrospective Chart Review.

机构信息

From the Department of Emergency Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY.

出版信息

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2024 Oct 1;40(10):717-721. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jun 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Pediatric patients with extremity fractures often require sedation for fracture reduction in the pediatric emergency department (PED). Although orthopedic literature suggests combination sedation regimens may be more effective for fracture reduction, some pediatric literature suggests adverse events are more frequent. The primary objective of this study is to determine the comparable depth of sedation and incidence of adverse events when intravenous ketamine is used alone versus with midazolam for pediatric procedural sedation and orthopedic fracture reduction.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients 2-18 years old who underwent sedation for fracture reduction in the PED at a single level 1 trauma center over a 2-year period. Medical records were reviewed, and occurrence of adverse events, depth of sedation (Ramsey score), midazolam dose, total ketamine administration, opiate administration, total sedation time, and time to PED discharge were compared in patients who received ketamine alone versus those who received ketamine with midazolam. Logistic regression models were adjusted to evaluate for potential confounders.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant increase in the occurrence of hypoxia with coadministration of midazolam (5% vs 0%). When hypoxia occurred, it was mild and resolved with repositioning or administration of supplemental oxygen. Length of sedation was increased in sedations with coadministration of benzodiazepines by approximately 3.5 minutes. Time to PED discharge was not significantly different. There was no significant difference in depth of sedation, ketamine dose administered, end-tidal CO 2 measurements, administration of positive pressure ventilation, vomiting, agitation, or overall occurrence of adverse events. No patients developed apnea or laryngospasm.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed a low rate of adverse events in pediatric sedation for orthopedic reduction with ketamine alone or ketamine with midazolam. There was an increased occurrence of hypoxia with coadministration of midazolam and an increase in the length of sedation. This study showed no difference in depth of sedation based on Ramsay scores when midazolam was coadministered. Information on the orthopedic reduction and provider satisfaction was not collected.

摘要

目的

儿科四肢骨折患者在儿科急诊室(PED)进行骨折复位时常需要镇静。尽管骨科文献表明联合镇静方案可能更有效地进行骨折复位,但一些儿科文献表明不良事件更为频繁。本研究的主要目的是确定单独使用静脉注射氯胺酮与氯胺酮联合咪达唑仑用于儿科程序镇静和骨科骨折复位时镇静深度和不良事件发生率的可比性。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了在一家单级 1 级创伤中心 PED 接受镇静以进行骨折复位的 2-18 岁儿科患者,研究时间为 2 年。回顾病历,比较单独使用氯胺酮与联合使用氯胺酮的患者不良事件的发生、镇静深度(Ramsey 评分)、咪达唑仑剂量、总氯胺酮用量、阿片类药物用量、总镇静时间和 PED 出院时间。使用逻辑回归模型进行调整,以评估潜在的混杂因素。

结果

联合使用咪达唑仑时,缺氧的发生率有统计学显著增加(5%比 0%)。当发生缺氧时,程度较轻,通过重新定位或给予补充氧气即可缓解。联合使用苯二氮䓬类药物时,镇静时间延长约 3.5 分钟。PED 出院时间无显著差异。镇静深度、给予的氯胺酮剂量、呼气末 CO 2 测量值、给予正压通气、呕吐、激越或不良事件总发生率均无显著差异。无患者发生呼吸暂停或喉痉挛。

结论

本研究表明,单独使用氯胺酮或氯胺酮联合咪达唑仑用于儿科骨科复位的镇静中,不良事件发生率较低。联合使用咪达唑仑时,缺氧的发生率增加,镇静时间延长。本研究表明,联合使用咪达唑仑时,Ramsay 评分的镇静深度无差异。未收集骨科复位和提供者满意度的信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验