Suppr超能文献

微创食管切除术患者吻合口狭窄的相关危险因素:来自高容量中心的经验

Risk Factors Associated With Anastomotic Stricture in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Experience From a High-Volume Center.

作者信息

Abaid Ali, Javed Talha, Yasin Fahad, Maqbool Fatima, Khattak Shahid, Syed Aamir

机构信息

Surgery, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, PAK.

Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, PAK.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Aug 7;16(8):e66362. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66362. eCollection 2024 Aug.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Esophageal cancer is a prevalent cancer, with a high incidence in low socioeconomic category countries. Minimally invasive esophagectomy is increasingly being used to treat this malignant condition. However, anastomotic stricture is a serious complication post esophagectomy. The study aims to enhance diagnostic consistency, improve treatment methods, guide patient management, stratify outcomes, and offer evidence-based preventive interventions.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 550 patients who had minimally invasive esophagus surgery was carried out at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre in Lahore between 2015 and 2020. All patients were treated with radical resection. For tumors of the lower esophagus and gastroesophageal junction, transhiatal esophagectomy was used; for tumors of the middle and upper thoracic esophagus, right video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) was used in a three-stage procedure. Patients were routinely followed up two weeks after discharge, then every three, six, and 12 months.

RESULTS

The mean age and BMI were 46.7 years and 19.4 kg/m, respectively. Anastomotic leaks were rare, with only 13 patients experiencing them. The grade of tumor differentiation was poor, moderate, and well-differentiated. The study found that older age, high Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, and malignancies located in the upper and middle one-third of the esophagus had significant associations with anastomotic stricture. However, some variables, like sex, did not show significant associations in either analysis.

CONCLUSION

The study reveals that factors such as older patient age, high ECOG performance status, single comorbidity, and malignancies located in the upper and middle one-third of the esophagus significantly influence anastomotic stricture. The study suggests that measures against anastomotic stricture such as endoscopic procedures and minimally invasive esophagectomy should be implemented to minimize the complications.

摘要

背景

食管癌是一种常见癌症,在社会经济水平较低的国家发病率较高。微创食管切除术越来越多地用于治疗这种恶性疾病。然而,吻合口狭窄是食管切除术后的一种严重并发症。本研究旨在提高诊断一致性、改进治疗方法、指导患者管理、分层预后,并提供基于证据的预防干预措施。

方法

对2015年至2020年期间在拉合尔的沙卡特·汗姆纪念癌症医院和研究中心接受微创食管手术的550例患者进行回顾性分析。所有患者均接受根治性切除。对于食管下段和胃食管交界处的肿瘤,采用经裂孔食管切除术;对于胸段食管中上部的肿瘤,采用右电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)分三个阶段进行。患者出院后常规随访两周,然后每三个月、六个月和十二个月随访一次。

结果

平均年龄和体重指数分别为46.7岁和19.4kg/m。吻合口漏很少见,只有13例患者出现。肿瘤分化程度为差、中、高分化。研究发现,年龄较大、东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态评分较高以及位于食管上三分之一和中三分之一的恶性肿瘤与吻合口狭窄显著相关。然而,一些变量,如性别,在两项分析中均未显示出显著相关性。

结论

该研究表明,患者年龄较大、ECOG体能状态评分较高、单一合并症以及位于食管上三分之一和中三分之一的恶性肿瘤等因素会显著影响吻合口狭窄。该研究建议应采取如内镜手术和微创食管切除术等预防吻合口狭窄的措施,以尽量减少并发症。

相似文献

4
Robot-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy: a 3-year single-center experience.
Dis Esophagus. 2013 Feb-Mar;26(2):159-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01325.x. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
5
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy the Standard of Care: Experience from a Tertiary Care Cancer Center from India.
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2021 Jun;12(2):335-349. doi: 10.1007/s13193-021-01291-y. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
6
Minimally invasive esophagectomy: lessons learned from 104 operations.
Ann Surg. 2008 Dec;248(6):1081-91. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818b72b5.
7
A long-term follow-up study of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with linear stapled anastomosis.
Surg Endosc. 2022 Mar;36(3):1979-1988. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08482-2. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
8
Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy with Linear Stapled Anastomosis Associated with Low Leak and Stricture Rates.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Aug;24(8):1729-1735. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04320-y. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
10
Risk of chyle leak after robotic versus video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy.
Surg Endosc. 2022 Feb;36(2):1332-1338. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08410-4. Epub 2021 Mar 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk Factors of Anastomosis Stricture After Esophagectomy and the Impact of Anastomosis Technique.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2023 May;115(5):1257-1264. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.01.026. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
2
Consequences of anastomotic leaks after minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center experience.
Surg Open Sci. 2022 Nov 17;11:26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2022.11.002. eCollection 2023 Jan.
4
Endoscopic dilation of benign post-esophagectomy anastomotic strictures: long-term outcomes and risk of recurrence.
Ann Gastroenterol. 2021;34(3):337-343. doi: 10.20524/aog.2021.0590. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
5
Stricture Following Esophageal Reconstruction.
Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Aug 5;53(4):222-225. doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2020.53.4.222.
7
Strategies to prevent anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy and gastric conduit reconstruction.
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 Dec;405(8):1069-1077. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01926-8. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
9
Risk Factors for Postoperative Anastomosis Leak After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.
In Vivo. 2020 Mar-Apr;34(2):857-862. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11849.
10
Population-based study of anastomotic stricture rates after minimally invasive and open oesophagectomy for cancer.
BJS Open. 2019 Jun 10;3(5):634-640. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50176. eCollection 2019 Oct.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验