• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于预测吉兰-巴雷综合征患者预后的可解释机器学习模型

Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Predicting the Prognosis of Guillain-Barré Syndrome Patients.

作者信息

Guo Junshuang, Zhang Ruike, Dong Ruirui, Yang Fan, Wang Yating, Miao Wang

机构信息

Neuro-Intensive Care Unit of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, People's Republic of China.

Department of Immunology, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha City, Hunan Province, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Inflamm Res. 2024 Sep 2;17:5901-5913. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S471626. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.2147/JIR.S471626
PMID:39247840
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11378785/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Machine learning (ML) is increasingly used in medical predictive modeling, but there are no studies applying ML to predict prognosis in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical records of 223 patients with GBS were analyzed to construct predictive models that affect patient prognosis. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) was used to filter the variables. Decision Trees (DT), Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), k-nearest Neighbour (KNN), Naive Bayes (NB), Neural Network (NN). Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM) and Logistic Regression (LR) were used to construct predictive models. Clinical data from 55 GBS patients were used to validate the model. SHapley additive explanation (SHAP) analysis was used to explain the model. Single sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) was used for immune cell infiltration analysis.

RESULTS

The AUCs (area under the curves) of the 8 ML algorithms including DT, RF, XGBoost, KNN, NB, NN, LGBM and LR were as follows: 0.75, 0.896 0.874, 0.666, 0.742, 0.765, 0.869 and 0.744. The accuracy of XGBoost (0.852) was the highest, followed by LGBM (0.803) and RF (0.758), with F1 index of 0.832, 0.794, and 0.667, respectively. The results of the validation set data analysis showed AUCs of 0.839, 0.919, and 0.733 for RF, XGBoost, and LGBM, respectively. SHAP analysis showed that the SHAP values of blood neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), age, mechanical ventilation, hyporeflexia and abnormal glossopharyngeal vagus nerve were 0.821, 0.645, 0.517, 0.401 and 0.109, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The combination of NLR, age, mechanical ventilation, hyporeflexia and abnormal glossopharyngeal vagus used to predict short-term prognosis in patients with GBS has a good predictive value.

摘要

背景

机器学习(ML)在医学预测建模中的应用日益广泛,但尚无将ML应用于预测吉兰-巴雷综合征(GBS)预后的研究。

材料与方法

分析223例GBS患者的病历,构建影响患者预后的预测模型。采用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)进行变量筛选。使用决策树(DT)、随机森林(RF)、极端梯度提升(XGBoost)、k近邻(KNN)、朴素贝叶斯(NB)、神经网络(NN)、轻梯度提升机(LGBM)和逻辑回归(LR)构建预测模型。使用55例GBS患者的临床数据对模型进行验证。采用SHapley加法解释(SHAP)分析对模型进行解释。采用单样本基因集富集分析(ssGSEA)进行免疫细胞浸润分析。

结果

DT、RF、XGBoost、KNN、NB、NN、LGBM和LR这8种ML算法的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为:0.75、0.896、0.874、0.666、0.742、0.765、0.869和0.744。XGBoost的准确率最高(0.852),其次是LGBM(0.803)和RF(0.758),F1指数分别为0.832、0.794和0.667。验证集数据分析结果显示,RF、XGBoost和LGBM的AUC分别为0.839、0.919和0.733。SHAP分析显示,血液中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、年龄、机械通气、反射减退和舌咽迷走神经异常的SHAP值分别为0.821、0.645、0.517、0.4

结论

联合NLR、年龄、机械通气、反射减退和舌咽迷走神经异常用于预测GBS患者的短期预后具有良好的预测价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/178a/11378785/b8055b9bb7ca/JIR-17-5901-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/178a/11378785/2c12ace733b2/JIR-17-5901-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/178a/11378785/1e18f822d07c/JIR-17-5901-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/178a/11378785/9768ced925a6/JIR-17-5901-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/178a/11378785/13b76eee7a17/JIR-17-5901-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/178a/11378785/9453ae2c9f99/JIR-17-5901-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/178a/11378785/b8055b9bb7ca/JIR-17-5901-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/178a/11378785/2c12ace733b2/JIR-17-5901-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/178a/11378785/1e18f822d07c/JIR-17-5901-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/178a/11378785/9768ced925a6/JIR-17-5901-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/178a/11378785/13b76eee7a17/JIR-17-5901-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/178a/11378785/9453ae2c9f99/JIR-17-5901-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/178a/11378785/b8055b9bb7ca/JIR-17-5901-g0006.jpg

相似文献

1
Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Predicting the Prognosis of Guillain-Barré Syndrome Patients.用于预测吉兰-巴雷综合征患者预后的可解释机器学习模型
J Inflamm Res. 2024 Sep 2;17:5901-5913. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S471626. eCollection 2024.
2
Interpretable machine learning model for predicting the prognosis of antibody positive autoimmune encephalitis patients.用于预测抗体阳性自身免疫性脑炎患者预后的可解释机器学习模型。
J Affect Disord. 2025 Jan 15;369:352-363. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.10.010. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
3
Clinical decision support systems for 3-month mortality in elderly patients admitted to ICU with ischemic stroke using interpretable machine learning.使用可解释机器学习的针对入住重症监护病房的老年缺血性中风患者3个月死亡率的临床决策支持系统
Digit Health. 2024 Sep 17;10:20552076241280126. doi: 10.1177/20552076241280126. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
4
A risk prediction model based on machine learning algorithm for parastomal hernia after permanent colostomy.基于机器学习算法的永久性结肠造口术后粪袋周围疝风险预测模型。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Aug 8;24(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02627-8.
5
Interpretable machine learning model based on the systemic inflammation response index and ultrasound features can predict central lymph node metastasis in cN0T1-T2 papillary thyroid carcinoma.基于全身炎症反应指数和超声特征的可解释机器学习模型能够预测cN0T1-T2期甲状腺乳头状癌的中央淋巴结转移。
Gland Surg. 2023 Nov 24;12(11):1485-1499. doi: 10.21037/gs-23-349. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
6
[Construction of a predictive model for in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients in intensive care unit based on machine learning].基于机器学习构建重症监护病房脓毒症患者院内死亡率预测模型
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2023 Jul;35(7):696-701. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20221219-01104.
7
[Constructing a predictive model for the death risk of patients with septic shock based on supervised machine learning algorithms].基于监督机器学习算法构建脓毒症休克患者死亡风险预测模型
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Apr;36(4):345-352. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20230930-00832.
8
Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury after Extracorporeal Cardiac Surgery (CSA-AKI) by Machine Learning Algorithms.机器学习算法预测体外循环心脏手术后急性肾损伤(CSA-AKI)。
Heart Surg Forum. 2023 Oct 25;26(5):E537-E551. doi: 10.59958/hsf.5673.
9
Interpretable machine learning model to predict surgical difficulty in laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer.用于预测直肠癌腹腔镜切除手术难度的可解释机器学习模型。
Front Oncol. 2024 Feb 6;14:1337219. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1337219. eCollection 2024.
10
Interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of delirium in elderly patients following intensive care unit admission: a derivation and validation study.用于重症监护病房收治的老年患者谵妄早期预测的可解释机器学习模型:一项推导与验证研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 May 17;11:1399848. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1399848. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Serial Serum Immunoglobulin G Levels and Correlation with Outcomes in Children with Guillain Barré Syndrome: Correspondence-2.吉兰-巴雷综合征患儿血清免疫球蛋白G水平系列及其与预后的相关性:通信-2
Indian J Pediatr. 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1007/s12098-025-05708-2.
2
Clinical and electrophysiological features of pure sensory Guillain-Barré syndrome: retrospective analysis of 22 patients across 14 provinces in Southern China.纯感觉性吉兰-巴雷综合征的临床及电生理特征:中国南方14省22例患者的回顾性分析
BMC Neurol. 2025 Mar 6;25(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12883-025-04103-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting of Mechanical Ventilation and Outcomes by Using Models and Biomarker in Guillain-Barré Syndrome.利用模型和生物标志物预测吉兰-巴雷综合征的机械通气及预后
Neurol Ther. 2023 Dec;12(6):2121-2132. doi: 10.1007/s40120-023-00546-w. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
2
An ensemble machine learning approach to predict postoperative mortality in older patients undergoing emergency surgery.一种集成机器学习方法,用于预测接受急诊手术的老年患者术后死亡率。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 May 2;23(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03969-0.
3
Application of machine learning algorithm in prediction of lymph node metastasis in patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer.
机器学习算法在预测中高危前列腺癌患者淋巴结转移中的应用。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Sep;149(11):8759-8768. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-04816-w. Epub 2023 May 2.
4
Development and External Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Prostate Cancer.开发和外部验证用于预测前列腺癌患者淋巴结转移的机器学习模型。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2023 Oct;6(5):501-507. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.02.006. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
5
Characteristics of Guillain-Barré syndrome in super-elderly individuals.超高龄个体吉兰-巴雷综合征的特征
J Neurol. 2023 Apr;270(4):2191-2196. doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-11567-8. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
6
Risk factors for the severity of Guillain-Barré syndrome and predictors of short-term prognosis of severe Guillain-Barré syndrome.格林-巴利综合征严重程度的危险因素和重症格林-巴利综合征短期预后的预测因素。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 2;11(1):11578. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91132-3.
7
Second intravenous immunoglobulin dose in patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome with poor prognosis (SID-GBS): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.吉兰-巴雷综合征预后不良患者的第二次静脉注射免疫球蛋白剂量(SID-GBS):一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2021 Apr;20(4):275-283. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30494-4. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
8
Clinical Characteristics and Predictors of Short-Term Outcome in Mexican Adult Patients with Guillain-Barré Syndrome.墨西哥成年吉兰-巴雷综合征患者的临床特征及短期预后的预测因素
Neurol India. 2021 Jan-Feb;69(1):107-114. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.310063.
9
Prognostic factors of Guillain-Barré syndrome: a 111-case retrospective review.吉兰-巴雷综合征的预后因素:111例回顾性研究。
Chin Neurosurg J. 2018 Jun 18;4:14. doi: 10.1186/s41016-018-0122-y. eCollection 2018.
10
Risk Factors for Mortality Due to Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in a Chinese Hospital: A Retrospective Study.中国某医院呼吸机相关性肺炎死亡的危险因素:一项回顾性研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Oct 12;25:7660-7665. doi: 10.12659/MSM.916356.