Center for Infection and Immunity, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
mBio. 2024 Oct 16;15(10):e0236024. doi: 10.1128/mbio.02360-24. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
the agent of Lyme disease, is estimated to cause >400,000 annual infections in the United States. Serology is the primary laboratory method to support the diagnosis of Lyme disease, but current methods have intrinsic limitations that require alternative approaches or targets. We used a high-density peptide array that contains >90,000 short overlapping peptides to catalog immunoreactive linear epitopes from >60 primary antigens of . We then pursued a machine learning approach to identify immunoreactive peptide panels that provide optimal Lyme disease serodiagnosis and can differentiate antibody responses at various stages of disease. We examined 226 serum samples from the Lyme Biobank and the National Institutes of Health, which included sera from 110 individuals diagnosed with Lyme disease, 31 probable cases from symptomatic individuals, and 85 healthy controls. Cases were grouped based on disease stage and presentation and included individuals with early localized, early disseminated, and late Lyme disease. We identified a peptide panel originating from 14 different epitopes that differentiated cases versus controls, whereas another peptide panel built from 12 unique epitopes differentiated subjects with various disease manifestations. Our method demonstrated an improvement in antibody detection over the current two-tiered testing approach and confirmed the key diagnostic role of VlsE and FlaB antigens at all stages of Lyme disease. We also uncovered epitopes that triggered a temporal antibody response that was useful for differentiation of early and late disease. Our findings can be used to streamline serologic targets and improve antibody-based diagnosis of Lyme disease.
Serology is the primary method of Lyme disease diagnosis, but this approach has limitations, particularly early in disease. Currently employed antibody detection assays can be improved by the identification of alternative immunodominant epitopes and the selection of optimal diagnostic targets. We employed high-density peptide arrays that enabled precise epitope mapping for a wide range of antigens. In combination with machine learning, this approach facilitated the selection of serologic targets early in disease and the identification of serological indicators associated with different manifestations of Lyme disease. This study provides insights into differential antibody responses during infection and outlines a new approach for improved serologic diagnosis of Lyme disease.
莱姆病的病原体估计在美国每年导致>400,000 例感染。血清学是支持莱姆病诊断的主要实验室方法,但目前的方法存在固有局限性,需要替代方法或目标。我们使用包含>90,000 个短重叠肽的高密度肽阵列来编目 >60 种主要抗原的免疫反应线性表位。然后,我们采用机器学习方法来识别提供最佳莱姆病血清诊断并能区分疾病不同阶段抗体反应的免疫反应性肽组。我们检查了莱姆生物库和美国国立卫生研究院的 226 份血清样本,其中包括 110 例确诊莱姆病患者、31 例有症状的可能病例和 85 例健康对照者的血清。病例根据疾病阶段和表现进行分组,包括早期局限性、早期播散性和晚期莱姆病患者。我们确定了一个源自 14 个不同表位的肽组,可将病例与对照者区分开,而另一个源自 12 个独特表位的肽组可将具有各种表现的患者区分开。我们的方法显示出在检测抗体方面优于现行的两阶段检测方法,并证实了 VlsE 和 FlaB 抗原在莱姆病的所有阶段的关键诊断作用。我们还发现了触发有用的早期和晚期疾病区分的时间依赖性抗体反应的表位。我们的发现可用于简化血清学靶标并改进莱姆病的基于抗体的诊断。
血清学是莱姆病诊断的主要方法,但这种方法存在局限性,特别是在疾病早期。目前使用的抗体检测方法可以通过鉴定替代免疫显性表位和选择最佳诊断靶标来改进。我们使用高密度肽阵列,为广泛的病原体抗原进行了精确的表位作图。结合机器学习,这种方法有助于在疾病早期选择血清学靶标,并确定与莱姆病不同表现相关的血清学指标。这项研究提供了关于感染期间不同抗体反应的见解,并概述了一种改进莱姆病血清学诊断的新方法。