• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一维社区检测:蒙特卡罗模拟、网格搜索及比较

Unidimensional community detection: A monte carlo simulation, grid search, and comparison.

作者信息

Christensen Alexander P

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University.

出版信息

Psychol Methods. 2024 Sep 9. doi: 10.1037/met0000692.

DOI:10.1037/met0000692
PMID:39250289
Abstract

Unidimensionality is fundamental to psychometrics. Despite the recent focus on dimensionality assessment in network psychometrics, unidimensionality assessment remains a challenge. Community detection algorithms are the most common approach to estimate dimensionality in networks. Many community detection algorithms maximize an objective criterion called modularity. A limitation of modularity is that it penalizes unidimensional structures in networks, favoring two or more communities (dimensions). In this study, this penalization is discussed and a solution is offered. Then, a Monte Carlo simulation using one- and two-factor models is performed. Key to the simulation was the condition of model error or the misfit of the population factor model to the generated data. Based on previous simulation studies, several community detection algorithms that have performed well with unidimensional structures (Leading Eigenvalue, Leiden, Louvain, and Walktrap) were compared. A grid search was performed on the tunable parameters of these algorithms to determine the optimal trade-off between unidimensional and bidimensional recovery. The best-performing parameters for each algorithm were then compared against each other as well as maximum likelihood factor analysis and parallel analysis (PA) with mean and 95th percentile eigenvalues. Overall, the Leiden and Louvain algorithms and PA methods were the most accurate methods to recover unidimensional and bidimensional structures and were the most robust to model error. More nuanced method recommendations for specific unidimensional and bidimensional conditions are provided. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

单维性是心理测量学的基础。尽管最近网络心理测量学关注维度评估,但单维性评估仍然是一项挑战。社区检测算法是估计网络维度最常用的方法。许多社区检测算法最大化一个称为模块度的目标标准。模块度的一个局限性在于它会惩罚网络中的单维结构,而倾向于两个或更多社区(维度)。在本研究中,讨论了这种惩罚并提供了一种解决方案。然后,使用单因素和双因素模型进行了蒙特卡洛模拟。模拟的关键是模型误差条件或总体因素模型与生成数据的拟合不佳情况。基于先前的模拟研究,比较了几种在单维结构上表现良好的社区检测算法(主导特征值、莱顿、鲁汶和随机游走算法)。对这些算法的可调参数进行了网格搜索,以确定单维和二维恢复之间的最佳权衡。然后将每种算法的最佳性能参数相互比较,以及与最大似然因子分析和平行分析(PA)进行比较,PA使用均值和第95百分位数特征值。总体而言,莱顿和鲁汶算法以及PA方法是恢复单维和二维结构最准确的方法,并且对模型误差最稳健。还提供了针对特定单维和二维条件的更细致的方法建议。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2024美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
Unidimensional community detection: A monte carlo simulation, grid search, and comparison.一维社区检测:蒙特卡罗模拟、网格搜索及比较
Psychol Methods. 2024 Sep 9. doi: 10.1037/met0000692.
2
Comparing community detection algorithms in psychometric networks: A Monte Carlo simulation.比较心理计量网络中的社区检测算法:一项蒙特卡罗模拟研究。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Mar;56(3):1485-1505. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02106-4. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
3
A comparison of spectral clustering and the walktrap algorithm for community detection in network psychometrics.网络心理测量学中用于社区检测的谱聚类与walktrap算法的比较。
Psychol Methods. 2024 Aug;29(4):704-722. doi: 10.1037/met0000509. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
4
A Monte Carlo Evaluation of Weighted Community Detection Algorithms.加权社区检测算法的蒙特卡罗评估
Front Neuroinform. 2016 Nov 10;10:45. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2016.00045. eCollection 2016.
5
On maximization of the modularity index in network psychometrics.网络心理计量学中模块性指数最大化问题研究
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Oct;55(7):3549-3565. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01975-5. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
6
Exploring Estimation Procedures for Reducing Dimensionality in Psychological Network Modeling.探索心理网络建模中降维的估计程序。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2025 Mar-Apr;60(2):184-210. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2024.2395941. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
7
Comparing the Clique Percolation algorithm to other overlapping community detection algorithms in psychological networks: A Monte Carlo simulation study.比较团渗透算法与心理网络中其他重叠社区检测算法:一项蒙特卡罗模拟研究。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Oct;56(7):7219-7240. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02415-2. Epub 2024 May 1.
8
Determining the number of factors using parallel analysis and its recent variants.利用并行分析及其最近的变体确定因素的数量。
Psychol Methods. 2019 Aug;24(4):452-467. doi: 10.1037/met0000230. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
9
Topological and functional comparison of community detection algorithms in biological networks.生物网络中社团检测算法的拓扑和功能比较。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2019 Apr 27;20(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12859-019-2746-0.
10
Isolate sets partition benefits community detection of parallel Louvain method.孤立集划分有助于并行 Louvain 方法的社区检测。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 17;12(1):8248. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11987-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing Interoperability for a Sustainable, Patient-Centric Health Care Value Chain: Systematic Review for Taxonomy Development.增强可持续、以患者为中心的医疗保健价值链的互操作性:分类法开发的系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 25;27:e69465. doi: 10.2196/69465.