Christensen Alexander P
Department of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University.
Psychol Methods. 2024 Sep 9. doi: 10.1037/met0000692.
Unidimensionality is fundamental to psychometrics. Despite the recent focus on dimensionality assessment in network psychometrics, unidimensionality assessment remains a challenge. Community detection algorithms are the most common approach to estimate dimensionality in networks. Many community detection algorithms maximize an objective criterion called modularity. A limitation of modularity is that it penalizes unidimensional structures in networks, favoring two or more communities (dimensions). In this study, this penalization is discussed and a solution is offered. Then, a Monte Carlo simulation using one- and two-factor models is performed. Key to the simulation was the condition of model error or the misfit of the population factor model to the generated data. Based on previous simulation studies, several community detection algorithms that have performed well with unidimensional structures (Leading Eigenvalue, Leiden, Louvain, and Walktrap) were compared. A grid search was performed on the tunable parameters of these algorithms to determine the optimal trade-off between unidimensional and bidimensional recovery. The best-performing parameters for each algorithm were then compared against each other as well as maximum likelihood factor analysis and parallel analysis (PA) with mean and 95th percentile eigenvalues. Overall, the Leiden and Louvain algorithms and PA methods were the most accurate methods to recover unidimensional and bidimensional structures and were the most robust to model error. More nuanced method recommendations for specific unidimensional and bidimensional conditions are provided. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
单维性是心理测量学的基础。尽管最近网络心理测量学关注维度评估,但单维性评估仍然是一项挑战。社区检测算法是估计网络维度最常用的方法。许多社区检测算法最大化一个称为模块度的目标标准。模块度的一个局限性在于它会惩罚网络中的单维结构,而倾向于两个或更多社区(维度)。在本研究中,讨论了这种惩罚并提供了一种解决方案。然后,使用单因素和双因素模型进行了蒙特卡洛模拟。模拟的关键是模型误差条件或总体因素模型与生成数据的拟合不佳情况。基于先前的模拟研究,比较了几种在单维结构上表现良好的社区检测算法(主导特征值、莱顿、鲁汶和随机游走算法)。对这些算法的可调参数进行了网格搜索,以确定单维和二维恢复之间的最佳权衡。然后将每种算法的最佳性能参数相互比较,以及与最大似然因子分析和平行分析(PA)进行比较,PA使用均值和第95百分位数特征值。总体而言,莱顿和鲁汶算法以及PA方法是恢复单维和二维结构最准确的方法,并且对模型误差最稳健。还提供了针对特定单维和二维条件的更细致的方法建议。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2024美国心理学会,保留所有权利)