• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

限制具有成本效益疗法的成本影响。

Cost effects of restricting cost-effective therapy.

作者信息

Bloom B S, Jacobs J

出版信息

Med Care. 1985 Jul;23(7):872-80. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198507000-00004.

DOI:10.1097/00005650-198507000-00004
PMID:3925258
Abstract

This article examines the cost effects of a closed pharmaceutical formulary on Medicaid expenditures for peptic ulcer disease. Studies were performed before and after the imposition of a closed pharmaceutical formulary and indicated that total Medicaid costs for peptic ulcer treatment were 15.0% lower during the closed formulary than open formulary periods. The overall savings were due mainly to a sharp decline in the number of peptic ulcer patients served by Medicaid. The cost per patient-month of therapy increased by 9.4% between study periods. Pharmaceutical costs per patient-month declined by 78.9%, monthly physician payments increased by 3.1%, and monthly inpatient hospital costs increased by 23.6%. The small, short-term savings may be negated by increased expenditures in the near future when sicker patients, previously denied peptic ulcer drug treatment, may reenter the Medicaid system in need of expensive inhospital treatment.

摘要

本文探讨了封闭式药品处方集对医疗补助计划中消化性溃疡疾病支出的成本影响。在实施封闭式药品处方集之前和之后均进行了研究,结果表明,与开放式处方集时期相比,封闭式处方集期间医疗补助计划用于消化性溃疡治疗的总成本降低了15.0%。总体节省主要归因于医疗补助计划所服务的消化性溃疡患者数量急剧下降。两个研究时期之间,每位患者每月的治疗成本增加了9.4%。每位患者每月的药品成本下降了78.9%,每月医生诊疗费用增加了3.1%,每月住院医院成本增加了23.6%。以前被拒绝给予消化性溃疡药物治疗的病情较重患者,可能在不久的将来重新进入医疗补助系统,需要昂贵的住院治疗,这可能会抵消短期内的少量节省。

相似文献

1
Cost effects of restricting cost-effective therapy.限制具有成本效益疗法的成本影响。
Med Care. 1985 Jul;23(7):872-80. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198507000-00004.
2
Medicaid formularies: a critical review of the literature.
J Pharm Mark Manage. 1988 Spring;2(3):39-61. doi: 10.3109/j058v02n03_05.
3
Patterns of care and expenditures by California Medicaid for peptic ulcer and other acid-related diseases.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 1989 Dec;11(6):615-20. doi: 10.1097/00004836-198912000-00003.
4
Can restrictions on reimbursement for anti-ulcer drugs decrease Medicaid pharmacy costs without increasing hospitalizations?对抗溃疡药物报销的限制能否在不增加住院率的情况下降低医疗补助计划的药房成本?
Health Serv Res. 1999 Feb;33(6):1593-610.
5
Cimetidine and the cost of peptic ulcer in the Netherlands.西咪替丁与荷兰消化性溃疡的治疗费用
Eff Health Care. 1984 Apr;1(6):297-311.
6
The Medicaid drug program in Louisiana: critique of the Hefner-Pracon Study.路易斯安那州的医疗补助药品计划:对赫夫纳 - 普拉康研究的批评
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1980 Oct;37(10):1350-3.
7
Formulary management of antiulcer drugs: economic considerations.抗溃疡药物的处方集管理:经济考量
Pharmacoeconomics. 1994 Apr;5(4):313-34. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199405040-00006.
8
The effects of cimetidine on the cost of ulcer disease in Sweden.西咪替丁对瑞典溃疡病治疗费用的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 1991;33(3):275-82. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90361-f.
9
The effects of an internal analgesic formulary restriction on Medicaid drug expenditures in Wisconsin.内部镇痛药物处方集限制对威斯康星州医疗补助药物支出的影响。
Med Care. 1989 Jan;27(1):34-44. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198901000-00004.
10
Impact of a transition to more restrictive drug formulary on therapy discontinuation and medication adherence.向更具限制性的药品处方集转变对治疗中断和药物依从性的影响。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2016 Feb;41(1):64-9. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12349. Epub 2016 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of restrictions on reimbursement.药品政策:报销限制的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Aug 4;2010(8):CD008654. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008654.
2
Making a case for employing a societal perspective in the evaluation of Medicaid prescription drug interventions.主张在评估医疗补助处方药干预措施时采用社会视角。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(4):281-96. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200826040-00002.
3
Impact of pharmaceutical prior authorisation policies : a systematic review of the literature.
药品预先授权政策的影响:文献系统评价
Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(8):637-48. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200725080-00002.
4
Prescription drug cost sharing: associations with medication and medical utilization and spending and health.处方药费用分担:与药物使用、医疗利用、支出及健康的关联
JAMA. 2007 Jul 4;298(1):61-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.1.61.
5
Impact of Medicaid preferred drug lists on therapeutic adherence.医疗补助计划优选药物清单对治疗依从性的影响。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24 Suppl 3:65-78. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200624003-00006.
6
Pharmaceutical cost management and access to psychotropic drugs: the U.S. context.药品成本管理与精神药物的可及性:美国的情况
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2005 Sep-Oct;28(5):484-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2005.08.004.
7
Economic analysis as an aid to subsidisation decisions: the development of Australian guidelines for pharmaceuticals.作为补贴决策辅助手段的经济分析:澳大利亚药品指南的制定
Pharmacoeconomics. 1992 Jan;1(1):54-67. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199201010-00010.
8
Economic impact of cost-containment strategies in third party programmes in the US. Part II.美国第三方项目中成本控制策略的经济影响。第二部分。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1993 Sep;4(3):187-202. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199304030-00004.
9
Delisting of drugs in Ontario. How attitudes and prescribing strategies of family physicians in the Kingston area changed.安大略省的药品退市。金斯顿地区家庭医生的态度和处方策略如何变化。
Can Fam Physician. 1996 Jul;42:1309-16.