Suppr超能文献

体外循环和 VA-ECMO 诱导的免疫功能障碍:共同特征和差异,叙述性综述。

Cardiopulmonary bypass and VA-ECMO induced immune dysfunction: common features and differences, a narrative review.

机构信息

Infectious Diseases and Intensive Care Unit, Pontchaillou University Hospital, 2 rue Henri Le Guilloux, 35033, Rennes, France.

SITI, Pole de Biologie, Pontchaillou University Hospital, Etablissement Français du Sang Bretagne, 2 rue Henri Le Guilloux, 35033, Rennes, France.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2024 Sep 10;28(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05058-z.

Abstract

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation are critical tools in contemporary cardiac surgery and intensive care, respectively. While these techniques share similar components, their application contexts differ, leading to distinct immune dysfunctions which could explain the higher incidence of nosocomial infections among ECMO patients compared to those undergoing CPB. This review explores the immune modifications induced by these techniques, comparing their similarities and differences, and discussing potential treatments to restore immune function and prevent infections. The immune response to CPB and ECMO involves both humoral and cellular components. The kinin system, complement system, and coagulation cascade are rapidly activated upon blood contact with the circuit surfaces, leading to the release of pro-inflammatory mediators. Ischemia-reperfusion injury and the release of damage-associated molecular patterns further exacerbate the inflammatory response. Cellular responses involve platelets, neutrophils, monocytes, dendritic cells, B and T lymphocytes, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells, all of which undergo phenotypic and functional alterations, contributing to immunoparesis. Strategies to mitigate immune dysfunctions include reducing the inflammatory response during CPB/ECMO and enhancing immune functions. Approaches such as off-pump surgery, corticosteroids, complement inhibitors, leukocyte-depleting filters, and mechanical ventilation during CPB have shown varying degrees of success in clinical trials. Immunonutrition, particularly arginine supplementation, has also been explored with mixed results. These strategies aim to balance the inflammatory response and support immune function, potentially reducing infection rates and improving outcomes. In conclusion, both CPB and ECMO trigger significant immune alterations that increase susceptibility to nosocomial infections. Addressing these immune dysfunctions through targeted interventions is essential to improving patient outcomes in cardiac surgery and critical care settings. Future research should focus on refining these strategies and developing new approaches to better manage the immune response in patients undergoing CPB and ECMO.

摘要

体外循环(CPB)和静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合(VA-ECMO)分别是当代心脏手术和重症监护中的关键工具。尽管这两种技术具有相似的组成部分,但它们的应用背景不同,导致免疫功能障碍也存在差异,这可以解释接受 ECMO 治疗的患者比接受 CPB 治疗的患者发生医院获得性感染的概率更高。本综述探讨了这些技术引起的免疫改变,比较了它们的异同,并讨论了恢复免疫功能和预防感染的潜在治疗方法。CPB 和 ECMO 引起的免疫反应涉及体液和细胞成分。血液与回路表面接触后,激肽系统、补体系统和凝血级联反应迅速被激活,导致促炎介质的释放。缺血再灌注损伤和损伤相关分子模式的释放进一步加剧了炎症反应。细胞反应涉及血小板、中性粒细胞、单核细胞、树突状细胞、B 和 T 淋巴细胞以及髓源性抑制细胞,所有这些细胞都发生表型和功能改变,导致免疫抑制。减轻免疫功能障碍的策略包括减少 CPB/ECMO 期间的炎症反应和增强免疫功能。如非体外循环手术、皮质类固醇、补体抑制剂、白细胞去除过滤器和 CPB 期间的机械通气等方法在临床试验中取得了不同程度的成功。免疫营养,特别是精氨酸补充,也取得了一些结果。这些策略旨在平衡炎症反应并支持免疫功能,从而降低感染率并改善预后。总之,CPB 和 ECMO 都会引起显著的免疫改变,增加医院获得性感染的易感性。通过有针对性的干预来解决这些免疫功能障碍对于改善心脏手术和重症监护环境中的患者结局至关重要。未来的研究应集中于完善这些策略并开发新方法,以更好地管理接受 CPB 和 ECMO 治疗的患者的免疫反应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a499/11389086/81494bae4022/13054_2024_5058_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验