Nowak Ewa, Białecki Marcin, Białecka Agnieszka, Kazimierczak Natalia, Kloska Anna
Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University Hospital no. 1 in Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Pol J Radiol. 2024 Aug 28;89:e420-e427. doi: 10.5114/pjr/192115. eCollection 2024.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an artificial intelligence (AI) tool in detecting endoleaks in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using dual-energy computed tomography angiography (CTA).
The study involved 95 patients who underwent EVAR and subsequent CTA follow-up. Dualenergy scans were performed, and images were reconstructed as linearly blended (LB) and 40 keV virtual monoenergetic (VMI) images. The AI tool PRAEVAorta2 was used to assess arterial phase images for endoleaks. Two experienced readers independently evaluated the same images, and their consensus served as the reference standard. Key metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), were calculated.
The final analysis included 94 patients. The AI tool demonstrated an accuracy of 78.7%, precision of 67.6%, recall of 10 71.9%, F1 score of 69.7%, and an AUC of 0.77 using LB images. However, the tool failed to process 40 keV VMI images correctly, limiting further analysis of these datasets.
The AI tool showed moderate diagnostic accuracy in detecting endoleaks using LB images but failed to achieve the reliability needed for clinical use due to the significant number of misdiagnoses.
本研究旨在评估一种人工智能(AI)工具在使用双能量计算机断层血管造影(CTA)检测接受血管内动脉瘤修复术(EVAR)患者的内漏方面的诊断准确性。
该研究纳入了95例行EVAR及随后CTA随访的患者。进行了双能量扫描,并将图像重建为线性混合(LB)和40 keV虚拟单能(VMI)图像。使用AI工具PRAEVAorta2评估动脉期图像中的内漏情况。两名经验丰富的阅片者独立评估相同的图像,他们的共识作为参考标准。计算了包括准确性、精确性、召回率、F1分数以及受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)等关键指标。
最终分析纳入了94例患者。使用LB图像时,AI工具的准确性为78.7%,精确性为67.6%,召回率为71.9%,F1分数为69.7%,AUC为0.77。然而,该工具未能正确处理40 keV VMI图像,限制了对这些数据集的进一步分析。
该AI工具在使用LB图像检测内漏方面显示出中等诊断准确性,但由于大量误诊,未能达到临床使用所需的可靠性。