Ponsiglione Andrea, Cereser Lorenzo, Spina Erica, Mannacio Luigi, Negroni Davide, Russo Luca, Muto Francesco, Di Costanzo Giuseppe, Stanzione Arnaldo, Cuocolo Renato, Imbriaco Massimo, Girometti Rossano
Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/@A_PonsiglioneMD.
Institute of Radiology, Department of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, University Hospital S. Maria della Misericordia, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale (ASUFC), Udine, Italy.
Eur J Radiol. 2024 Dec;181:111716. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111716. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
To assess the inter-reader and intra-reader agreement of the Prostate imaging quality version 2 (PI-QUAL v.2) for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) among radiologists with varying levels of expertise.
Fifty men underwent 3 T mpMRI scans in a tertiary referral center. Images were anonymized and assessed by six readers of different expertise (2 expert, 2 basic and 2 beginners) in two sessions: first using PI-QUAL v.2, and then using both PI-QUAL v.2 and v.1 after a 2-week interval. PI-QUAL v.2 scores were considered overall and, for comparison with PI-QUAL v.1, dichotomized according to the threshold of acceptable image quality. Gwet AC index was used to calculate the inter-reader and intra-reader agreement of the scores.
The inter-reader agreement for PI-QUAL v.2 scores was overall moderate (Gwet's AC = 0.55), being higher for expert readers compared to the beginner and basic ones (Gwet's AC = 0.66 versus 0.45-0-58). Intra-reader agreement varied from moderate to perfect (Gwet's AC = 0.43-1.00) and improved with increasing levels of expertise. The ratings were more reproducible for DWI and DCE sequences (Gwet's AC = 0.62-1.00) compared to T2w (Gwet's AC = 0.24-0.70). The intra-reader agreement between PI-QUAL v.2 and v.1 scores across readings ranged from almost perfect to perfect (Gwet's AC = 0.96-1.00).
In a tertiary referral center context, PI-QUAL v.2 is a moderately reliable tool for standardizing prostate mpMRI quality evaluations among readers with varying expertise.
评估不同专业水平的放射科医生对多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)使用前列腺成像质量版本2(PI-QUAL v.2)的阅片者间和阅片者内一致性。
50名男性在三级转诊中心接受3T mpMRI扫描。图像进行匿名处理,由6名不同专业水平的阅片者(2名专家、2名基础水平和2名初学者)分两个阶段进行评估:第一阶段使用PI-QUAL v.2,第二阶段在间隔2周后同时使用PI-QUAL v.2和v.1。PI-QUAL v.2评分作为整体评分,为了与PI-QUAL v.1进行比较,根据可接受图像质量阈值进行二分法分类。使用Gwet AC指数计算评分的阅片者间和阅片者内一致性。
PI-QUAL v.2评分的阅片者间一致性总体为中等(Gwet's AC = 0.55),与初学者和基础水平阅片者相比,专家阅片者的一致性更高(Gwet's AC = 0.66,而初学者和基础水平阅片者为0.45 - 0.58)。阅片者内一致性从中等到完美不等(Gwet's AC = 0.43 - 1.00),并随着专业水平的提高而改善。与T2w序列(Gwet's AC = 0.24 - 0.70)相比,DWI和DCE序列的评分再现性更高(Gwet's AC = 0.62 - 1.00)。各次阅片之间PI-QUAL v.2和v.1评分的阅片者内一致性从几乎完美到完美不等(Gwet's AC = 0.96 - 1.00)。
在三级转诊中心环境中,PI-QUAL v.2是一种中等可靠的工具,可用于在不同专业水平的阅片者之间标准化前列腺mpMRI质量评估。