Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Health Economics, AstraZeneca Nordic AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
Med Decis Making. 2024 Oct;44(7):843-853. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241275969. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
In economic evaluations of novel therapies, assessing lifetime effects based on trial data often necessitates survival extrapolation, with the choice of model affecting outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess accuracy and variability between alternative approaches to survival extrapolation.
Data on HER2-positive breast cancer patients from the Swedish National Breast Cancer Register were used to fit standard parametric distribution (SPD) models and excess hazard (EH) models adjusting the survival projections based on general population mortality (GPM). Models were fitted using 6-y data for stage I and II, 4-y data for stage III, and 2-y data for stage IV cancer reflecting an early data cutoff while maintaining sufficient events for comparison of model estimates with actual long-term outcomes. We compared model projections of 15-y survival and restricted mean survival time (RMST) to 15-y registry data and explored the variability between models in extrapolations of long-term survival.
Among 11,224 patients compared with the observed registry 15-y RMST estimates across the disease stages, EH cure models provided the most accurate estimates in patients with stage I to III cancer, whereas EH models without cure most closely matched survival in patients with stage IV cancer, in which cure assumption was less plausible. The Akaike information criterion-averaged model projections varied as follows: -8.2% to +5.3% for SPD models, -4.9% to +5.2% for the EH model without a cure assumption, and -19.3% to -0.2% for the EH model with a cure assumption. EH models significantly reduced between-model variance in the predicted RMSTs over a 50-y time horizon compared with SPD models.
EH models may be considered as alternatives to SPD models to produce more accurate and plausible survival extrapolation that accounts for general population mortality.
Excess hazard (EH) methods have been suggested as an approach to incorporate background mortality rates in economic evaluation using survival extrapolation.We highlight that EH models with or without a cure assumption can produce more accurate survival projections and significantly reduce between-model variability in comparison with standard parametric distribution models across cancer stages.EH models may be a preferred modeling method to reduce model uncertainty in health economic modeling since models that would otherwise have produced implausible extrapolations are constrained by the EH framework.Reduced uncertainty in economic evaluations will enhance the application of evidence-based health care decision making.
在新型疗法的经济评估中,基于试验数据评估终生效应通常需要进行生存外推,而模型的选择会影响结果。本研究旨在评估生存外推的替代方法之间的准确性和可变性。
使用来自瑞典国家乳腺癌登记处的 HER2 阳性乳腺癌患者数据,拟合标准参数分布(SPD)模型和超额风险(EH)模型,根据一般人群死亡率(GPM)调整生存预测。使用 6 年的数据拟合 I 期和 II 期,4 年的数据拟合 III 期,2 年的数据拟合 IV 期癌症,以反映早期数据截止,同时保持足够的事件来比较模型估计值与实际的长期结果。我们将模型对 15 年生存率和限制平均生存时间(RMST)的预测与 15 年登记数据进行比较,并探讨了长期生存外推中模型之间的可变性。
与疾病各阶段的观察登记处 15 年 RMST 估计值相比,在 11224 名患者中,EH 治愈模型在 I 期至 III 期癌症患者中提供了最准确的估计值,而无治愈假设的 EH 模型最接近 IV 期癌症患者的生存情况,在这些患者中,治愈假设不太合理。Akaike 信息准则平均模型预测值的变化范围如下:SPD 模型为-8.2%至+5.3%,无治愈假设的 EH 模型为-4.9%至+5.2%,有治愈假设的 EH 模型为-19.3%至-0.2%。EH 模型在 50 年时间内显著降低了预测 RMST 之间的模型间方差,与 SPD 模型相比。
EH 模型可以作为 SPD 模型的替代方法,以产生更准确和合理的生存外推,考虑到一般人群的死亡率。
已经提出了超额风险(EH)方法,作为使用生存外推进行经济评估中纳入背景死亡率的一种方法。我们强调,EH 模型(无论是否有治愈假设)都可以在癌症各阶段产生更准确的生存预测,并与标准参数分布模型相比,显著降低模型间的变异性。EH 模型可能是减少健康经济建模中模型不确定性的首选建模方法,因为否则会产生不合理外推的模型受到 EH 框架的限制。经济评估中不确定性的降低将增强基于证据的医疗保健决策的应用。