Suppr超能文献

社区参与式研究以及利用开放获取的 ToxVal/ToxRef 体内数据库和新方法学(NAM)来应对环境污染物对人类健康的风险。

Community-Engaged Research and the Use of Open Access ToxVal/ToxRef In Vivo Databases and New Approach Methodologies (NAM) to Address Human Health Risks From Environmental Contaminants.

机构信息

Co-Chair Community Stakeholders' Advisory Committee, University of California (UC Davis), Environmental Health Sciences Center (EHSC), Davis, California, USA.

Co-Director Community Engagement Core, UC Davis EHSC, Davis, California, USA.

出版信息

Birth Defects Res. 2024 Sep;116(9):e2395. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.2395.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The paper analyzes opportunities for integrating Open access resources (Abstract Sifter, US EPA and NTP Toxicity Value and Toxicity Reference [ToxVal/ToxRefDB]) and New Approach Methodologies (NAM) integration into Community Engaged Research (CEnR).

METHODS

CompTox Chemicals Dashboard and Integrated Chemical Environment with in vivo ToxVal/ToxRef and NAMs (in vitro) databases are presented in three case studies to show how these resources could be used in Pilot Projects involving Community Engaged Research (CEnR) from the University of California, Davis, Environmental Health Sciences Center.

RESULTS

Case #1 developed a novel assay methodology for testing pesticide toxicity. Case #2 involved detection of water contaminants from wildfire ash and Case #3 involved contaminants on Tribal Lands. Abstract Sifter/ToxVal/ToxRefDB regulatory data and NAMs could be used to screen/prioritize risks from exposure to metals, PAHs and PFAS from wildfire ash leached into water and to investigate activities of environmental toxins (e.g., pesticides) on Tribal lands. Open access NAMs and computational tools can apply to detection of sensitive biological activities in potential or known adverse outcome pathways to predict points of departure (POD) for comparison with regulatory values for hazard identification. Open access Systematic Empirical Evaluation of Models or biomonitoring exposures are available for human subpopulations and can be used to determine bioactivity (POD) to exposure ratio to facilitate mitigation.

CONCLUSIONS

These resources help prioritize chemical toxicity and facilitate regulatory decisions and health protective policies that can aid stakeholders in deciding on needed research. Insights into exposure risks can aid environmental justice and health equity advocates.

摘要

背景

本文分析了将开放获取资源(摘要筛选器、美国环保署和 NTP 毒性值和毒性参考 [ToxVal/ToxRefDB])和新方法学(NAM)整合到社区参与式研究(CEnR)中的机会。

方法

CompTox Chemicals Dashboard 和集成化学环境,其中包含体内 ToxVal/ToxRef 和 NAMs(体外)数据库,通过三个案例研究展示了这些资源如何在涉及加利福尼亚大学戴维斯分校环境健康科学中心社区参与式研究(CEnR)的试点项目中使用。

结果

案例 1 开发了一种新的农药毒性测试方法。案例 2 涉及从野火灰中检测水污染物,案例 3 涉及部落土地上的污染物。摘要筛选器/ToxVal/ToxRefDB 监管数据和 NAMs 可用于筛选/优先考虑从野火灰浸出到水中的金属、多环芳烃和 PFAS 暴露的风险,并调查环境毒素(如农药)在部落土地上的活动。开放获取的 NAMs 和计算工具可应用于检测潜在或已知不良结局途径中的敏感生物活性,以预测与危险识别的监管值进行比较的起点 (POD)。开放获取的系统性经验模型评估或生物监测暴露情况适用于人类亚群,可以用来确定生物活性(POD)与暴露比,以促进缓解。

结论

这些资源有助于优先考虑化学毒性,并促进监管决策和健康保护政策,从而帮助利益相关者决定所需的研究。对暴露风险的深入了解可以帮助环境正义和健康公平倡导者。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Systematic Approaches for the Encoding of Chemical Groups: A Case Study.化学基团编码的系统方法:一个案例研究
Chem Res Toxicol. 2024 Apr 15;37(4):600-619. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.3c00411. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
5
Adverse effects in traditional and alternative toxicity tests.传统和替代毒性测试中的不良反应。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2024 Mar;148:105579. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105579. Epub 2024 Feb 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验