Suppr超能文献

从本体论到关系论:对医学辅助死亡审议中援引的尊严概念的范围综述。

From ontological to relational: A scoping review of conceptions of dignity invoked in deliberations on medically assisted death.

机构信息

Philosophy and Arts Department, University of Quebec at Trois-Rivieres, Trois-Rivieres, QC, Canada.

Department of Health Sciences, University of Quebec at Rimouski, Levis, QC, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Sep 12;25(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01095-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dignity is omnipresent in Western ethics, but it also provokes dissension and controversy. One of the most striking examples is the debate on medically assisted death, where dignity is invoked to support antagonistic positions. While some authors conclude that the concept is useless as an ethical reference, many others invite us to deepen our analysis from a multidimensional perspective, to enrich it and make it useful. This scoping study is intended to provide an overview of the different conceptions of dignity used in the assisted dying debate, to better grasp the multiple facets of the concept.

METHODS

The Joanna Briggs Institute's JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis guided the scoping review. Key words were based on the researchers' expertise and were used to identify relevant literature in French and English. Eleven databases covering the last six decades were consulted. Initially, 2,071 references were found in the databases. After excluding duplicates, screening titles, abstracts, and full texts, and after a specific literature search on the concept of relational dignity, 156 papers were found to match the identified inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

The literature highlights the stark confrontation between two dominant conceptions of dignity: ontological and autonomist. However, a lesser-known conceptualization of dignity integrates these two perspectives, underlining the relational and social dimensions of dignity. As a result, dignity emerges as a dynamic, experiential, and dialogical concept, that modulates itself according to circumstances. This raises the possibility of breaking through the binary debate and questioning the current frameworks that define dignity.

CONCLUSIONS

This multidimensional conceptualization of dignity could lead to a more complete and nuanced understanding of the concept, as well as open richer normative horizons regarding the issue of medically assisted death.

摘要

背景

尊严在西方伦理学中无处不在,但它也引发了分歧和争议。其中一个最引人注目的例子是关于协助死亡的辩论,尊严在其中被援引以支持对立的立场。虽然一些作者得出结论,认为该概念作为伦理参考是无用的,但许多其他作者邀请我们从多维的角度深入分析它,以丰富和使其有用。这项范围界定研究旨在提供一个概述,说明在协助死亡辩论中使用的不同尊严概念,以便更好地理解该概念的多个方面。

方法

乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的 JBI 证据综合手册指导了范围综述。关键词基于研究人员的专业知识,并用于在法语和英语中确定相关文献。共查阅了 11 个涵盖过去六十年的数据库。最初,在数据库中找到了 2071 个参考文献。在排除重复、筛选标题、摘要和全文以及对关系尊严概念进行专门文献搜索后,发现了 156 篇符合确定纳入标准的论文。

结果

文献强调了尊严的两种主导概念之间的鲜明对立:本体论和自主论。然而,一种不太为人知的尊严概念将这两种观点结合在一起,强调了尊严的关系和社会维度。因此,尊严成为一个动态的、经验的和对话的概念,根据情况进行自我调节。这就有可能打破二元辩论,并对定义尊严的现行框架提出质疑。

结论

这种尊严的多维概念化可能导致对该概念更全面和细致的理解,并为关于协助死亡的问题打开更丰富的规范前景。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6698/11391684/1bd1ad9bc053/12910_2024_1095_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验