miRNA 异构体、tRNA 衍生片段和 rRNA 衍生片段的亚细胞分布取决于核苷酸序列和细胞类型。
The subcellular distribution of miRNA isoforms, tRNA-derived fragments, and rRNA-derived fragments depends on nucleotide sequence and cell type.
机构信息
Computational Medicine Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, 19017, USA.
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
出版信息
BMC Biol. 2024 Sep 12;22(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12915-024-01970-6.
BACKGROUND
MicroRNA isoforms (isomiRs), tRNA-derived fragments (tRFs), and rRNA-derived fragments (rRFs) represent most of the small non-coding RNAs (sncRNAs) found in cells. Members of these three classes modulate messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein abundance and are dysregulated in diseases. Experimental studies to date have assumed that the subcellular distribution of these molecules is well-understood, independent of cell type, and the same for all isoforms of a sncRNA.
RESULTS
We tested these assumptions by investigating the subcellular distribution of isomiRs, tRFs, and rRFs in biological replicates from three cell lines from the same tissue and same-sex donors that model the same cancer subtype. In each cell line, we profiled the isomiRs, tRFs, and rRFs in the nucleus, cytoplasm, whole mitochondrion (MT), mitoplast (MP), and whole cell. Using a rigorous mathematical model we developed, we accounted for cross-fraction contamination and technical errors and adjusted the measured abundances accordingly. Analyses of the adjusted abundances show that isomiRs, tRFs, and rRFs exhibit complex patterns of subcellular distributions. These patterns depend on each sncRNA's exact sequence and the cell type. Even in the same cell line, isoforms of the same sncRNA whose sequences differ by a few nucleotides (nts) can have different subcellular distributions.
CONCLUSIONS
SncRNAs with similar sequences have different subcellular distributions within and across cell lines, suggesting that each isoform could have a different function. Future computational and experimental studies of isomiRs, tRFs, and rRFs will need to distinguish among each molecule's various isoforms and account for differences in each isoform's subcellular distribution in the cell line at hand. While the findings add to a growing body of evidence that isomiRs, tRFs, rRFs, tRNAs, and rRNAs follow complex intracellular trafficking rules, further investigation is needed to exclude alternative explanations for the observed subcellular distribution of sncRNAs.
背景
微小 RNA 异构体(isomiRs)、tRNA 衍生片段(tRFs)和 rRNA 衍生片段(rRFs)代表了细胞中存在的大多数小非编码 RNA(sncRNAs)。这三类分子调节信使 RNA(mRNA)和蛋白质的丰度,并在疾病中失调。迄今为止的实验研究假设这些分子的亚细胞分布是已知的,与细胞类型无关,并且对于 sncRNA 的所有异构体都是相同的。
结果
我们通过研究来自同一组织和相同性别的三个细胞系的生物重复样本中的亚细胞分布,来测试这些假设。在每个细胞系中,我们对核、细胞质、整个线粒体(MT)、线粒体(MP)和整个细胞中的 isomiRs、tRFs 和 rRFs 进行了分析。我们使用了我们开发的严格的数学模型,该模型考虑了跨部分污染和技术误差,并相应地调整了测量的丰度。对调整后的丰度的分析表明,isomiRs、tRFs 和 rRFs 表现出复杂的亚细胞分布模式。这些模式取决于每个 sncRNA 的精确序列和细胞类型。即使在同一细胞系中,具有几个核苷酸(nts)差异的同一 sncRNA 的异构体也可能具有不同的亚细胞分布。
结论
具有相似序列的 sncRNAs 在细胞系内和细胞系之间具有不同的亚细胞分布,这表明每个异构体可能具有不同的功能。未来对 isomiRs、tRFs 和 rRFs 的计算和实验研究将需要区分每个分子的各种异构体,并考虑手头细胞系中每个异构体的亚细胞分布的差异。虽然这些发现增加了越来越多的证据表明 isomiRs、tRFs、rRFs、tRNAs 和 rRNAs 遵循复杂的细胞内运输规则,但需要进一步研究以排除 sncRNAs 观察到的亚细胞分布的替代解释。