• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单世界干预图(SWIGs):实用指南。

Single World Intervention Graphs (SWIGs): A Practical Guide.

作者信息

Bezuidenhout Dana, Forthal Sarah, Rudolph Kara, Lamb Matthew R

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, United States.

ICAP at Columbia University, New York, New York, United States.

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Sep 11. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae353.

DOI:10.1093/aje/kwae353
PMID:39267210
Abstract

This article offers a comprehensive and user-friendly guide to visualizing causal theories using Single World Intervention Graphs (SWIGs). We begin with a discussion of the potential outcomes approach to causality and limitations of using Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) under this framework. We then introduce SWIGs as a simple but powerful tool for integrating potential outcomes explicitly into causal diagrams. The article provides a step-by-step guide on transforming DAGs into SWIGs that includes practical insights into constructing SWIGs under various scenarios such as confounding, mediation, and sequential randomization. Highlighting the utility of SWIGs in practice, we illustrate their application in identifying the g-formula, showcasing their capacity to make causal estimands visually explicit. This article serves as a resource for epidemiologists and researchers interested in expanding their causal inference toolkit.

摘要

本文提供了一份全面且用户友好的指南,介绍如何使用单世界干预图(SWIGs)来可视化因果理论。我们首先讨论因果关系的潜在结果方法以及在此框架下使用有向无环图(DAGs)的局限性。然后,我们将SWIGs作为一种简单而强大的工具引入,用于将潜在结果明确整合到因果图中。本文提供了将DAGs转换为SWIGs的分步指南,其中包括在各种场景(如混杂、中介和序贯随机化)下构建SWIGs的实用见解。通过强调SWIGs在实践中的实用性,我们展示了它们在识别g公式中的应用,突显了它们使因果估计在视觉上清晰明确的能力。本文为有兴趣扩展其因果推断工具集的流行病学家和研究人员提供了资源。

相似文献

1
Single World Intervention Graphs (SWIGs): A Practical Guide.单世界干预图(SWIGs):实用指南。
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Sep 11. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae353.
2
Clarifying Causal Effects of Interest and Underlying Assumptions in Randomized and Nonrandomized Clinical Trials in Oncology Using Directed Acyclic Graphs and Single-World Intervention Graphs.使用有向无环图和单世界干预图阐明肿瘤学中随机和非随机临床试验的兴趣因果效应和潜在假设。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2024 Jun;8(1):e2300262. doi: 10.1200/CCI.23.00262.
3
Athletic Injury Research: Frameworks, Models and the Need for Causal Knowledge.运动损伤研究:框架、模型和因果知识的需求。
Sports Med. 2024 May;54(5):1121-1137. doi: 10.1007/s40279-024-02008-1. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
4
Directed acyclic graphs to minimise bias and optimise causal inference in SNAP-3: an observational cohort study of frailty, multimorbidity, and delirium in older surgical patients.有向无环图用于最小化SNAP-3中的偏倚并优化因果推断:一项关于老年外科患者衰弱、多病共存和谵妄的观察性队列研究
Br J Anaesth. 2025 Jul;135(1):177-187. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2025.04.027. Epub 2025 May 27.
5
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome全身炎症反应综合征
6
Causal inference from observational data in neurosurgical studies: a mini-review and tutorial.神经外科研究中观察性数据的因果推断:一篇小型综述与教程
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2025 Feb 12;167(1):40. doi: 10.1007/s00701-025-06450-6.
7
Decoloniality and healthcare higher education: Critical conversations.去殖民化与高等医疗教育:批判性对话。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 May-Jun;59(3):1243-1252. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12982. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
8
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
9
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
10
Developing evidence-based guidelines for describing potential benefits and harms within patient information leaflets/sheets (PILs) that inform and do not cause harm (PrinciPILs).制定基于证据的指南,用于在患者信息单页/说明书(PrinciPILs)中描述潜在益处和危害,这些信息单页既能提供信息又不会造成伤害。
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Aug;29(43):1-20. doi: 10.3310/GJJH2402.

本文引用的文献

1
Single-world intervention graphs for defining, identifying, and communicating estimands in clinical trials.单世界干预图在临床试验中定义、识别和沟通目标值的应用。
Stat Med. 2023 Sep 20;42(21):3892-3902. doi: 10.1002/sim.9833. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
2
The Future of Causal Inference.因果推断的未来。
Am J Epidemiol. 2022 Sep 28;191(10):1671-1676. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac108.
3
Using Negative Control Outcomes and Difference-in-Differences Analysis to Estimate Treatment Effects in an Entirely Treated Cohort: The Effect of Ivacaftor in Cystic Fibrosis.
利用阴性对照结局和双重差分分析在全治疗队列中估计治疗效果:依伐卡托特在囊性纤维化中的作用。
Am J Epidemiol. 2022 Feb 19;191(3):505-515. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab263.
4
Tutorial on directed acyclic graphs.有向无环图教程。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Feb;142:264-267. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.08.001. Epub 2021 Aug 8.
5
Assessing knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards causal directed acyclic graphs: a qualitative research project.评估因果有向无环图的知识、态度和实践:一项定性研究项目。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;36(7):659-667. doi: 10.1007/s10654-021-00771-3. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
6
Study Designs for Extending Causal Inferences From a Randomized Trial to a Target Population.从随机试验到目标人群推广因果推论的研究设计。
Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Aug 1;190(8):1632-1642. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwaa270.
7
Benchmarking Observational Methods by Comparing Randomized Trials and Their Emulations.通过比较随机试验及其模拟来对标观察性方法。
Epidemiology. 2020 Sep;31(5):614-619. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001231.
8
A Graphical Description of Partial Exchangeability.部分可交换性的图形描述。
Epidemiology. 2020 May;31(3):365-368. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001165.
9
Win-Win: Reconciling Social Epidemiology and Causal Inference.双赢:调和社会流行病学与因果推断。
Am J Epidemiol. 2020 Mar 2;189(3):167-170. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz158.
10
CAUSAL INFERENCE WITH A GRAPHICAL HIERARCHY OF INTERVENTIONS.基于干预图形层次结构的因果推断
Ann Stat. 2016 Dec;44(6):2433-2466. doi: 10.1214/15-AOS1411. Epub 2016 Nov 23.