Suppr超能文献

[小儿癫痫药物治疗的撤药与重新用药。我们的经验]

[Withdrawal and reintroduction of pharmacological treatment of epilepsy in paediatric patients. Our experience].

作者信息

Morte-Coscolín P, Gómez-Sánchez C, López-Pisón J, Fariña-Jara M V, Martínez-Calvo F F, Fernando-Martínez R

机构信息

Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, España.

Centro de Atención Primaria Gorg, Badalona, España.

出版信息

Rev Neurol. 2024 Sep 16;79(6):147-154. doi: 10.33588/rn.7906.2024268.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There are many variables to be considered in the withdrawal of treatment for epileptic seizures, which requires a risk-benefit assessment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of patients in a neuropaediatric practice who required the reintroduction of treatment for epilepsy after its initial withdrawal, and who continue to receive anti-seizure drugs.

RESULTS

Twenty-three of 57 children whose treatment was withdrawn are currently being administered the treatment as a monotherapy. Attempts at withdrawal were made with 17 patients, with a mean seizure-free period of 26 months; range: 8-47 months (excluding one patient who never stopped presenting seizures). Mean age at the time of the last known data: 16 years; range: 7-28 years. Average time until the first seizure after withdrawal: 12 months; range: 1-82 months. Seizures persist despite the current treatment administered in eight cases. Two or three attempts to withdraw treatment were made in six patients, with a mean seizure-free period of 28.6 months; range: 22-48 months. Mean age at the time of the last known data: 18.68 years; range: 13-37 years. Average time until the first seizure after withdrawal: 8.2 months; range: 1-30 months. They presented seizures after treatment four was reintroduced. 52% of the patients presented seizures while receiving the drug, which was discontinued. The treatment was withdrawn in cases meeting criteria for persistent seizures: three refractory epilepsies, five symptomatic focal epilepsies, four cases with intellectual disability, five adolescent-onset epilepsies, and failures in previous withdrawal in 23 cases and 30 attempts.

CONCLUSION

The decision to withdraw treatment must be personalised, and consider the risk of relapse, taking into account efficacy and tolerability, and behaviour and neurodevelopment in particular.

摘要

引言

癫痫发作治疗的撤药需要考虑诸多变量,这需要进行风险效益评估。

患者与方法

对神经儿科诊所中那些在最初撤药后需要重新开始癫痫治疗且仍在接受抗癫痫药物治疗的患者进行回顾性研究。

结果

57名撤药儿童中有23名目前正在接受单一疗法治疗。对17名患者进行了撤药尝试,平均无癫痫发作期为26个月;范围:8 - 47个月(不包括一名从未停止发作的患者)。最后已知数据时的平均年龄:16岁;范围:7 - 28岁。撤药后至首次发作的平均时间:12个月;范围:1 - 82个月。8例患者尽管目前正在接受治疗,但癫痫发作仍持续。6名患者进行了两到三次撤药尝试,平均无癫痫发作期为28.6个月;范围:22 - 48个月。最后已知数据时的平均年龄:18.68岁;范围:13 - 37岁。撤药后至首次发作的平均时间:8.2个月;范围:1 - 30个月。重新引入治疗4后他们出现了癫痫发作。52%的患者在服用药物时出现癫痫发作,该药物被停用。在符合持续性癫痫发作标准的情况下撤药:3例难治性癫痫、5例症状性局灶性癫痫、4例智力残疾患者、5例青少年期癫痫,以及23例和30次尝试中之前撤药失败的情况。

结论

撤药决定必须个体化,并考虑复发风险,尤其要考虑疗效和耐受性,以及行为和神经发育情况。

相似文献

8
Prognosis of adults and children following a first unprovoked seizure.首次无诱因发作后成人和儿童的预后。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 23;1(1):CD013847. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013847.pub2.
10
Rufinamide add-on therapy for refractory epilepsy.鲁非酰胺辅助治疗难治性癫痫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 25;4(4):CD011772. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011772.pub2.

本文引用的文献

2
[Considerations about treatment of childhood epilepsy with lamotrigine].[关于使用拉莫三嗪治疗儿童癫痫的考量]
J Healthc Qual Res. 2023 May-Jun;38(3):186-190. doi: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2022.08.009. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
7
A Practical Guide to Treatment of Childhood Absence Epilepsy.儿童失神癫痫治疗实用指南。
Paediatr Drugs. 2019 Feb;21(1):15-24. doi: 10.1007/s40272-019-00325-x.
8
The management of epilepsy in children and adults.儿童和成人癫痫的管理。
Med J Aust. 2018 Mar 19;208(5):226-233. doi: 10.5694/mja17.00951.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验