Suppr超能文献

[经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗肝硬化患者食管胃静脉曲张出血合并肌少症的长期预后分析]

[Analysis of the long-term prognosis of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt treatment for esophagogastric variceal hemorrhage concomitant with sarcopenia in cirrhotic patients].

作者信息

Wang X X, Zhang M, Yin X C, Gao B, Gu L L, Li W, Xiao J Q, Zhang S, Zhang W, Zhang X, Zou X P, Wang L, Zhuge Y Z, Zhang F

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210000, China Second Clinical Medical School, Medical School, Southeast University, Nanjing 210000, China.

Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210000, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2024 Aug 20;32(8):744-752. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20240414-00203.

Abstract

To explore whether transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) can improve the prognosis of esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EGVB) combined with sarcopenia in cirrhotic patients. A retrospective cohort study was performed. A total of 464 cases with cirrhotic EGVB who received standard or TIPS treatment between January 2017 and December 2019 were selected. Regular follow-up was performed for the long-term after treatment. The primary outcome was transplantation-free survival. The secondary endpoints were rebleeding and overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE). The obtained data were statistically analyzed. The -test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used to compare continuous variables between groups. The test, or Fisher's exact probability test, was used to compare categorical variables between groups. The age of the included patients was 55.27±13.86 years, and 286 cases were male. There were 203 cases of combined sarcopenia and 261 cases of non-combined sarcopenia. The median follow-up period was 43 months. The two groups had no statistically significant difference in follow-up time. There was no statistically significant difference in transplant-free survival between the TIPS group and the standard treatment group in the overall cohort (=1.31, 95%: 0.97-1.78, =0.08). The TIPS patient group with cirrhosis combined with sarcopenia had longer transplant-free survival (median survival: 47.76 vs. 52.45, =4.09; =1.55, 95: 1.012.38, =0.04). There was no statistically significant difference in transplant-free survival between the two kinds of treatments for patients without sarcopenia (=1.22, 95%: 0.781.88, =0.39). Rebleeding time was prolonged in TIPS patients with or without sarcopenia combination (patients without combined sarcopenia: median rebleeding time: 39.48 vs. 53.61, =18.68; =2.47, 95: 1.673.65, <0.01; patients with sarcopenia: median rebleeding time: 39.91 vs. 50.68, =12.36; =2.20, 95: 1.423.40, <0.01). TIPS patients had an increased 1-year OHE incidence rate compared to the standard treatment group (sarcopenia patients: 6.93% vs. 16.67%, =3.87, =0.049; patients without sarcopenia combination: 2.19% vs. 9.68%, =8.85, =0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in the long-term OHE incidence rate between the two kinds of treatment groups (>0.05). TIPS can significantly prolong transplant-free survival compared to standard treatment as a secondary prevention of EGVB concomitant with sarcopenia in patients with cirrhosis. However, its advantage is not prominent for patients with cirrhosis in EGVB without sarcopenia.

摘要

探讨经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)能否改善肝硬化患者食管胃静脉曲张破裂出血(EGVB)合并肌少症的预后。进行了一项回顾性队列研究。选取2017年1月至2019年12月期间接受标准治疗或TIPS治疗的464例肝硬化EGVB患者。治疗后进行长期定期随访。主要结局是无移植生存。次要终点是再出血和显性肝性脑病(OHE)。对获得的数据进行统计学分析。采用t检验和Wilcoxon秩和检验比较组间连续变量。采用χ²检验或Fisher确切概率检验比较组间分类变量。纳入患者的年龄为55.27±13.86岁,男性286例。合并肌少症203例,未合并肌少症261例。中位随访期为43个月。两组随访时间差异无统计学意义。总体队列中,TIPS组与标准治疗组的无移植生存差异无统计学意义(P=1.31,95%CI:0.971.78,P=0.08)。肝硬化合并肌少症的TIPS患者组无移植生存时间更长(中位生存时间:47.76对52.45,P=4.09;P=1.55,95%CI:1.012.38,P=0.04)。对于无肌少症的患者,两种治疗方式的无移植生存差异无统计学意义(P=1.22,95%CI:0.781.88,P=0.39)。合并或未合并肌少症的TIPS患者再出血时间均延长(未合并肌少症患者:中位再出血时间:39.48对53.61,P=18.68;P=2.47,95%CI:1.673.65,P<0.01;合并肌少症患者:中位再出血时间:39.91对50.68,P=12.36;P=2.20,95%CI:1.42~3.40,P<0.01)。与标准治疗组相比,TIPS患者1年OHE发病率升高(合并肌少症患者:6.93%对16.67%,P=3.87,P=0.049;未合并肌少症患者:2.19%对9.68%,P=8.85,P=0.01)。两种治疗组的长期OHE发病率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。作为肝硬化患者EGVB合并肌少症的二级预防措施,与标准治疗相比,TIPS可显著延长无移植生存时间。然而,对于无肌少症的肝硬化EGVB患者,其优势并不突出。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验