Suppr超能文献

一种含氟化物-洗必泰的研磨型牙膏和一种含氧化酶的含氟牙膏对牙菌斑生长的抑制作用。

Plaque growth-inhibiting effects of an abrasive fluoride-chlorhexidine toothpaste and a fluoride toothpaste containing oxidative enzymes.

作者信息

Etemadzadeh H, Ainamo J, Murtomaa H

出版信息

J Clin Periodontol. 1985 Aug;12(7):607-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1985.tb01393.x.

Abstract

The aim of this 4 times cross-over double-blind clinical trial was to test the plaque-inhibiting effect of 2 fluoride-containing toothpastes. One toothpaste contained 0.8% chlorhexidine together with amine fluoride (0.1% F degrees) and a suitable abrasive agent. The other contained 1.7 U/g glucose oxidase and 8.0 U/g amyloglucosidase, added to an amine fluoride (0.1% F degrees) toothpaste. 1% Hibitane dental gel was used as a positive and a conventional fluoride toothpaste (Vademecum MFP Fluor) as a negative control. 9 dental students, in a randomized sequence, applied the 4 dentifrices twice daily from Monday afternoon to Friday morning with cap splints, designed to cover the teeth and about 2 mm of gingiva. No other oral hygiene measures were allowed during the 4 test periods. On Fridays, the teeth were cleaned professionally and good oral hygiene was maintained during the week-ends. At the beginning and at the end of each test period, per student plaque thickness was recorded using the plaque index, the visible plaque index, and plaque fresh weight as parameters, and the area of plaque as related to the area of the tooth surface was recorded planimetrically and according to the PLQ index. The best plaque growth-inhibiting effect was recorded for the positive control (CHX) with the test chlorhexidine toothpaste (TX) as next best. The enzyme-containing toothpaste (TE) did not differ significantly from the negative control (C). All the significant differences in anti-plaque effect between the 4 toothpastes were obtained by recordings of plaque thickness and none on the basis of area of plaque.

摘要

这项4次交叉双盲临床试验的目的是测试两种含氟牙膏的防斑效果。一种牙膏含有0.8%的洗必泰以及胺氟化物(0.1%F°)和一种合适的研磨剂。另一种牙膏在胺氟化物(0.1%F°)牙膏中添加了1.7U/g葡萄糖氧化酶和8.0U/g淀粉葡萄糖苷酶。1%的氯己定牙科凝胶用作阳性对照,一种传统的含氟牙膏(Vademecum MFP Fluor)用作阴性对照。9名牙科学生按照随机顺序,从周一下午到周五上午,每天两次使用帽式夹板涂抹这4种牙膏,帽式夹板旨在覆盖牙齿和大约2毫米的牙龈。在4个测试期内不允许采取其他口腔卫生措施。在周五,对牙齿进行专业清洁,并在周末保持良好的口腔卫生。在每个测试期开始和结束时,以菌斑指数、可见菌斑指数和菌斑鲜重为参数记录每位学生的菌斑厚度,并根据PLQ指数用平面测量法记录与牙齿表面面积相关的菌斑面积。阳性对照(CHX)的防斑效果最佳,测试的洗必泰牙膏(TX)次之。含酶牙膏(TE)与阴性对照(C)没有显著差异。4种牙膏之间防斑效果的所有显著差异都是通过记录菌斑厚度得出的,而不是基于菌斑面积。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验