Reilly Cavan, Mylonakis Eleftherios, Dewar Robin, Young Barnaby, Nordwall Jacqueline, Bhagani Sanjay, Chia Po-Ying, Davis Ruby, Files Clark, Ginde Adit A, Hatlen Timothy, Helleberg Marie, Hayanga Awori, Jensen Tomas O, Jain Mamta K, Kalomenidis Ioannis, Kim Kami, Lallemand Perrine, Lindegaard Birgitte, Menon Anupama, Ognenovska Katherine, Poulakou Garyfallia, Thorup Røge Birgit, Rogers Angela J, Shaw-Saliba Katy, Sandkovsky Uriel, Trautner Barbara W, Vasudeva Shikha S, Vekstein Andrew, Viens Kimberley, Wyncoll James, DuChateau Brian, Zhang Zhenxing, Wu Shujiang, Babiker Abdel G, Davey Victoria, Gelijns Annetine, Higgs Elizabeth, Kan Virginia, Lundgren Jens, Matthews Gail V, Lane H Cliff
Division of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Texas.
J Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 17;231(3):677-683. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiae452.
Biomarker-guided therapy could improve management of inpatients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Although some results indicate that antibody tests are prognostic, little is known about patient management using point-of-care (POC) antibody tests.
COVID-19 inpatients were recruited to evaluate 2 POC tests: LumiraDx and RightSign. Ease of use data were collected. Blood was also collected for centralized testing using an established antibody assay (GenScript cPass). A nested case-control study assessed if POC tests conducted on stored specimens were predictive of time to sustained recovery, mortality, and a composite safety outcome.
While both POC tests exhibited moderate agreement with the GenScript assay (both agreeing with 89% of antibody determinations), they were significantly different from the GenScript assay. Treating the GenScript assay as the gold standard, the LumiraDx assay had 99.5% sensitivity and 58.1% specificity whereas the RightSign assay had 89.5% sensitivity and 84.0% specificity. The LumiraDx assay frequently gave indeterminant results. Both tests were significantly associated with clinical outcomes.
Although both POC tests deviated moderately from the GenScript assay, they predicted outcomes of interest. The RightSign test was easier to use and was more likely to detect those lacking antibody compared to the LumiraDx test treating GenScript as the gold standard.
NCT05227404.
生物标志物引导的治疗可改善2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)住院患者的管理。尽管一些结果表明抗体检测具有预后价值,但对于使用即时检验(POC)抗体检测进行患者管理知之甚少。
招募COVID-19住院患者以评估两种POC检测:LumiraDx和RightSign。收集易用性数据。还采集血液,使用既定的抗体检测方法(金斯瑞cPass)进行集中检测。一项巢式病例对照研究评估了对储存样本进行的POC检测是否可预测持续恢复时间、死亡率和综合安全结局。
虽然两种POC检测与金斯瑞检测的一致性都为中等(两者均与89%的抗体测定结果一致),但它们与金斯瑞检测存在显著差异。将金斯瑞检测视为金标准,LumiraDx检测的灵敏度为99.5%,特异性为58.1%,而RightSign检测的灵敏度为89.5%,特异性为84.0%。LumiraDx检测经常给出不确定结果。两种检测均与临床结局显著相关。
虽然两种POC检测与金斯瑞检测相比都有适度偏差,但它们可预测相关结局。将金斯瑞检测视为金标准时,与LumiraDx检测相比,RightSign检测使用更简便,且更有可能检测出缺乏抗体的患者。
NCT05227404。